“You Don’t Manage What You Don’t Measure” … But Do You Really Manage What You Measure?

The imperious need to measure safety performances through indicators is now a well-established tradition in the process safety community. You don’t improve what you don’t measure has consequently been the mantra that drove important efforts of the community towards not only building reliable lagging...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chabane Mazri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. 2021-06-01
Series:Chemical Engineering Transactions
Online Access:https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/11487
_version_ 1819062693555863552
author Chabane Mazri
author_facet Chabane Mazri
author_sort Chabane Mazri
collection DOAJ
description The imperious need to measure safety performances through indicators is now a well-established tradition in the process safety community. You don’t improve what you don’t measure has consequently been the mantra that drove important efforts of the community towards not only building reliable lagging representations of safety evolutions but also designing leading indicators providing decision makers with anticipation abilities. Taking a step back in order to gaining perspective allows us to understand the origin and foundations of this situation. P.Drucker’s “If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it” seems to be the original starting point that indeed has spread throughout the management community in times where quality management was promising zero default products and conformity to standards believed as the key to successful management. However, management science has moved away towards far more modest precepts thanks to large efforts dedicated to observing real life decision making and organizations appropriation of management tools. Consequently, it is required for the safety community to deconstruct this precept and explore its validity given process safety specificities. This paper is a contribution to this effort. We will discuss accordingly this precept through two complementary angles. The first (measuring but not managing) questions the extent to which measuring paves the road for good management. This first angle provides the reader with the key traps separating measurement from management. The second angle (managing without measuring) shed lights on successful management practices not necessarily relying on anterior measurement. One should not throw the baby with the bathwater. This work is not be understood as a proposal to put aside or discredit safety measurement efforts which remain necessary. It however invites safety managers to put these approaches in perspective and question their validity scope so to make the best out of them without being imprisoned by their limits or sometimes, misleading character.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T15:02:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c1c53930ad964f8fb18e485eb9c63305
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2283-9216
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T15:02:50Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.
record_format Article
series Chemical Engineering Transactions
spelling doaj.art-c1c53930ad964f8fb18e485eb9c633052022-12-21T18:59:32ZengAIDIC Servizi S.r.l.Chemical Engineering Transactions2283-92162021-06-018610.3303/CET2186061“You Don’t Manage What You Don’t Measure” … But Do You Really Manage What You Measure?Chabane MazriThe imperious need to measure safety performances through indicators is now a well-established tradition in the process safety community. You don’t improve what you don’t measure has consequently been the mantra that drove important efforts of the community towards not only building reliable lagging representations of safety evolutions but also designing leading indicators providing decision makers with anticipation abilities. Taking a step back in order to gaining perspective allows us to understand the origin and foundations of this situation. P.Drucker’s “If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it” seems to be the original starting point that indeed has spread throughout the management community in times where quality management was promising zero default products and conformity to standards believed as the key to successful management. However, management science has moved away towards far more modest precepts thanks to large efforts dedicated to observing real life decision making and organizations appropriation of management tools. Consequently, it is required for the safety community to deconstruct this precept and explore its validity given process safety specificities. This paper is a contribution to this effort. We will discuss accordingly this precept through two complementary angles. The first (measuring but not managing) questions the extent to which measuring paves the road for good management. This first angle provides the reader with the key traps separating measurement from management. The second angle (managing without measuring) shed lights on successful management practices not necessarily relying on anterior measurement. One should not throw the baby with the bathwater. This work is not be understood as a proposal to put aside or discredit safety measurement efforts which remain necessary. It however invites safety managers to put these approaches in perspective and question their validity scope so to make the best out of them without being imprisoned by their limits or sometimes, misleading character.https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/11487
spellingShingle Chabane Mazri
“You Don’t Manage What You Don’t Measure” … But Do You Really Manage What You Measure?
Chemical Engineering Transactions
title “You Don’t Manage What You Don’t Measure” … But Do You Really Manage What You Measure?
title_full “You Don’t Manage What You Don’t Measure” … But Do You Really Manage What You Measure?
title_fullStr “You Don’t Manage What You Don’t Measure” … But Do You Really Manage What You Measure?
title_full_unstemmed “You Don’t Manage What You Don’t Measure” … But Do You Really Manage What You Measure?
title_short “You Don’t Manage What You Don’t Measure” … But Do You Really Manage What You Measure?
title_sort you don t manage what you don t measure but do you really manage what you measure
url https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/11487
work_keys_str_mv AT chabanemazri youdontmanagewhatyoudontmeasurebutdoyoureallymanagewhatyoumeasure