Phenotypic Variation during Biofilm Formation: Implications for Anti-Biofilm Therapeutic Design

Various bacterial species cycle between growth phases and biofilm formation, of which the latter facilitates persistence in inhospitable environments. These phases can be generally characterized by one or more cellular phenotype(s), each with distinct virulence factor functionality. In addition, a v...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marie Beitelshees, Andrew Hill, Charles H. Jones, Blaine A. Pfeifer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-06-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/11/7/1086
_version_ 1811323599321038848
author Marie Beitelshees
Andrew Hill
Charles H. Jones
Blaine A. Pfeifer
author_facet Marie Beitelshees
Andrew Hill
Charles H. Jones
Blaine A. Pfeifer
author_sort Marie Beitelshees
collection DOAJ
description Various bacterial species cycle between growth phases and biofilm formation, of which the latter facilitates persistence in inhospitable environments. These phases can be generally characterized by one or more cellular phenotype(s), each with distinct virulence factor functionality. In addition, a variety of phenotypes can often be observed within the phases themselves, which can be dependent on host conditions or the presence of nutrient and oxygen gradients within the biofilm itself (i.e., microenvironments). Currently, most anti-biofilm strategies have targeted a single phenotype; this approach has driven effective, yet incomplete, protection due to the lack of consideration of gene expression dynamics throughout the bacteria’s pathogenesis. As such, this article provides an overview of the distinct phenotypes found within each biofilm development phase and demonstrates the unique anti-biofilm solutions each phase offers. However, we conclude that a combinatorial approach must be taken to provide complete protection against biofilm forming bacterial and their resulting diseases.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T13:58:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c1c8aa2434754eaebf8d94885c7e5e7c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1944
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T13:58:58Z
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Materials
spelling doaj.art-c1c8aa2434754eaebf8d94885c7e5e7c2022-12-22T02:44:07ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442018-06-01117108610.3390/ma11071086ma11071086Phenotypic Variation during Biofilm Formation: Implications for Anti-Biofilm Therapeutic DesignMarie Beitelshees0Andrew Hill1Charles H. Jones2Blaine A. Pfeifer3Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260, USADepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260, USAAbcombi Biosciences Inc., 1576 Sweet Home Road, Amherst, NY 14228, USADepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260, USAVarious bacterial species cycle between growth phases and biofilm formation, of which the latter facilitates persistence in inhospitable environments. These phases can be generally characterized by one or more cellular phenotype(s), each with distinct virulence factor functionality. In addition, a variety of phenotypes can often be observed within the phases themselves, which can be dependent on host conditions or the presence of nutrient and oxygen gradients within the biofilm itself (i.e., microenvironments). Currently, most anti-biofilm strategies have targeted a single phenotype; this approach has driven effective, yet incomplete, protection due to the lack of consideration of gene expression dynamics throughout the bacteria’s pathogenesis. As such, this article provides an overview of the distinct phenotypes found within each biofilm development phase and demonstrates the unique anti-biofilm solutions each phase offers. However, we conclude that a combinatorial approach must be taken to provide complete protection against biofilm forming bacterial and their resulting diseases.http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/11/7/1086bacterial biofilmscommensal bacteriabacterial phenotypesanti-biofilm strategiesanti-adhesiondispersion
spellingShingle Marie Beitelshees
Andrew Hill
Charles H. Jones
Blaine A. Pfeifer
Phenotypic Variation during Biofilm Formation: Implications for Anti-Biofilm Therapeutic Design
Materials
bacterial biofilms
commensal bacteria
bacterial phenotypes
anti-biofilm strategies
anti-adhesion
dispersion
title Phenotypic Variation during Biofilm Formation: Implications for Anti-Biofilm Therapeutic Design
title_full Phenotypic Variation during Biofilm Formation: Implications for Anti-Biofilm Therapeutic Design
title_fullStr Phenotypic Variation during Biofilm Formation: Implications for Anti-Biofilm Therapeutic Design
title_full_unstemmed Phenotypic Variation during Biofilm Formation: Implications for Anti-Biofilm Therapeutic Design
title_short Phenotypic Variation during Biofilm Formation: Implications for Anti-Biofilm Therapeutic Design
title_sort phenotypic variation during biofilm formation implications for anti biofilm therapeutic design
topic bacterial biofilms
commensal bacteria
bacterial phenotypes
anti-biofilm strategies
anti-adhesion
dispersion
url http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/11/7/1086
work_keys_str_mv AT mariebeitelshees phenotypicvariationduringbiofilmformationimplicationsforantibiofilmtherapeuticdesign
AT andrewhill phenotypicvariationduringbiofilmformationimplicationsforantibiofilmtherapeuticdesign
AT charleshjones phenotypicvariationduringbiofilmformationimplicationsforantibiofilmtherapeuticdesign
AT blaineapfeifer phenotypicvariationduringbiofilmformationimplicationsforantibiofilmtherapeuticdesign