Effect of quitting immediately vs progressively on smoking cessation for smokers at emergency department in Hong Kong: A posteriori analysis of a randomized controlled trial
<h4>Background</h4> A progressive approach to quitting smoking has been a popular strategy for motivating smokers who are reluctant to quit. However, whether this strategy can effectively achieve complete cessation or is as successful as quitting immediately remains unresolved. This stud...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879435/?tool=EBI |
| _version_ | 1811176103901921280 |
|---|---|
| author | William Ho Cheung Li Wei Xia Man Ping Wang Derek Yee Tak Cheung Kai Yeung Cheung Carlos King Ho Wong Tai Hing Lam |
| author_facet | William Ho Cheung Li Wei Xia Man Ping Wang Derek Yee Tak Cheung Kai Yeung Cheung Carlos King Ho Wong Tai Hing Lam |
| author_sort | William Ho Cheung Li |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <h4>Background</h4> A progressive approach to quitting smoking has been a popular strategy for motivating smokers who are reluctant to quit. However, whether this strategy can effectively achieve complete cessation or is as successful as quitting immediately remains unresolved. This study aimed to determine whether quitting immediately or progressively was more effective in achieving complete cessation among smokers in Hong Kong who presented at emergency departments. <h4>Methods and findings</h4> A posteriori analysis of a single-blinded, multicenter, randomized controlled trial was performed. The original trials was conducted at emergency departments of four major acute hospitals in different districts of Hong Kong. In total, 1571 smokers 18 years or older who presented at 4 major emergency departments between July 4, 2015 and March 17, 2017 were randomized into an intervention group (n = 787) and a control group (n = 784). The intervention group received brief advice (about 1 minute) and could choose their own quit schedules (immediate or progressive, labeled QI and QP, respectively). The control group received a smoking cessation leaflet. Follow-ups were conducted at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. The primary outcomes, by intention-to-treat, were biochemically validated abstinence between the QI subgroup and control group; between the QP subgroup and control group, and between the QI subgroup and QP subgroup at 6 months. After the propensity sore matching, the biochemically validated abstinence was statistically significantly higher in the QI subgroup than the control group at 6 months (12.1% vs 3.4%, P = 0.003; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.34, 95% CI 1.63–11.52) and higher in the QP subgroup than the control group at 6 months (9.8% vs 3.4%, P = 0.02; aORs 2.95, 95% CI: 1.04–8.39). No statistically significant differences of biochemically validated abstinence at both 6 month (12.1% vs 9.8%, P = 0.49; aORs 1.50, 95% CI: 0.71–3.19) were found in the comparison between QI and QP subgroups. <h4>Conclusions</h4> This study demonstrates that the strategy of quitting progressively is effective, especially for smokers who lack motivation or find it difficult to quit. If adopted routinely, such an approach can help achieve a greater level of smoking abstinence in the community. <h4>Trial registration</h4> ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02660957. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T19:46:40Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c1d3f94d14724f6582f5d8d07aec1905 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T19:46:40Z |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-c1d3f94d14724f6582f5d8d07aec19052023-01-29T05:31:02ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-01181Effect of quitting immediately vs progressively on smoking cessation for smokers at emergency department in Hong Kong: A posteriori analysis of a randomized controlled trialWilliam Ho Cheung LiWei XiaMan Ping WangDerek Yee Tak CheungKai Yeung CheungCarlos King Ho WongTai Hing Lam<h4>Background</h4> A progressive approach to quitting smoking has been a popular strategy for motivating smokers who are reluctant to quit. However, whether this strategy can effectively achieve complete cessation or is as successful as quitting immediately remains unresolved. This study aimed to determine whether quitting immediately or progressively was more effective in achieving complete cessation among smokers in Hong Kong who presented at emergency departments. <h4>Methods and findings</h4> A posteriori analysis of a single-blinded, multicenter, randomized controlled trial was performed. The original trials was conducted at emergency departments of four major acute hospitals in different districts of Hong Kong. In total, 1571 smokers 18 years or older who presented at 4 major emergency departments between July 4, 2015 and March 17, 2017 were randomized into an intervention group (n = 787) and a control group (n = 784). The intervention group received brief advice (about 1 minute) and could choose their own quit schedules (immediate or progressive, labeled QI and QP, respectively). The control group received a smoking cessation leaflet. Follow-ups were conducted at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. The primary outcomes, by intention-to-treat, were biochemically validated abstinence between the QI subgroup and control group; between the QP subgroup and control group, and between the QI subgroup and QP subgroup at 6 months. After the propensity sore matching, the biochemically validated abstinence was statistically significantly higher in the QI subgroup than the control group at 6 months (12.1% vs 3.4%, P = 0.003; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.34, 95% CI 1.63–11.52) and higher in the QP subgroup than the control group at 6 months (9.8% vs 3.4%, P = 0.02; aORs 2.95, 95% CI: 1.04–8.39). No statistically significant differences of biochemically validated abstinence at both 6 month (12.1% vs 9.8%, P = 0.49; aORs 1.50, 95% CI: 0.71–3.19) were found in the comparison between QI and QP subgroups. <h4>Conclusions</h4> This study demonstrates that the strategy of quitting progressively is effective, especially for smokers who lack motivation or find it difficult to quit. If adopted routinely, such an approach can help achieve a greater level of smoking abstinence in the community. <h4>Trial registration</h4> ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02660957.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879435/?tool=EBI |
| spellingShingle | William Ho Cheung Li Wei Xia Man Ping Wang Derek Yee Tak Cheung Kai Yeung Cheung Carlos King Ho Wong Tai Hing Lam Effect of quitting immediately vs progressively on smoking cessation for smokers at emergency department in Hong Kong: A posteriori analysis of a randomized controlled trial PLoS ONE |
| title | Effect of quitting immediately vs progressively on smoking cessation for smokers at emergency department in Hong Kong: A posteriori analysis of a randomized controlled trial |
| title_full | Effect of quitting immediately vs progressively on smoking cessation for smokers at emergency department in Hong Kong: A posteriori analysis of a randomized controlled trial |
| title_fullStr | Effect of quitting immediately vs progressively on smoking cessation for smokers at emergency department in Hong Kong: A posteriori analysis of a randomized controlled trial |
| title_full_unstemmed | Effect of quitting immediately vs progressively on smoking cessation for smokers at emergency department in Hong Kong: A posteriori analysis of a randomized controlled trial |
| title_short | Effect of quitting immediately vs progressively on smoking cessation for smokers at emergency department in Hong Kong: A posteriori analysis of a randomized controlled trial |
| title_sort | effect of quitting immediately vs progressively on smoking cessation for smokers at emergency department in hong kong a posteriori analysis of a randomized controlled trial |
| url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879435/?tool=EBI |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT williamhocheungli effectofquittingimmediatelyvsprogressivelyonsmokingcessationforsmokersatemergencydepartmentinhongkongaposteriorianalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT weixia effectofquittingimmediatelyvsprogressivelyonsmokingcessationforsmokersatemergencydepartmentinhongkongaposteriorianalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT manpingwang effectofquittingimmediatelyvsprogressivelyonsmokingcessationforsmokersatemergencydepartmentinhongkongaposteriorianalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT derekyeetakcheung effectofquittingimmediatelyvsprogressivelyonsmokingcessationforsmokersatemergencydepartmentinhongkongaposteriorianalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kaiyeungcheung effectofquittingimmediatelyvsprogressivelyonsmokingcessationforsmokersatemergencydepartmentinhongkongaposteriorianalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT carloskinghowong effectofquittingimmediatelyvsprogressivelyonsmokingcessationforsmokersatemergencydepartmentinhongkongaposteriorianalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT taihinglam effectofquittingimmediatelyvsprogressivelyonsmokingcessationforsmokersatemergencydepartmentinhongkongaposteriorianalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial |