Nitti e gli interventi speciali per il Mezzogiorno del 1904. Per una comparazione tra il caso napoletano e quello lucano
The article proposes a comparative reading of the two extraordinary interventions on and for the Mezzogiorno promoted by Zanardelli and Giolitti, namely one for Basilicata (l. 140/1904) and the other for Naples (l. 351/1904). The ‘special workshops’ that would follow identified in Francesco Saverio...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Edizioni Università di Cassino
2021-12-01
|
| Series: | Democrazia e Diritti Sociali |
| Online Access: | https://www.democraziaedirittisociali.it/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Verrastro.pdf |
| _version_ | 1797773637795708928 |
|---|---|
| author | Donato Verrastro |
| author_facet | Donato Verrastro |
| author_sort | Donato Verrastro |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The article proposes a comparative reading of the two extraordinary interventions on and for the Mezzogiorno promoted by Zanardelli and Giolitti, namely one for Basilicata (l. 140/1904) and the other for Naples (l. 351/1904). The ‘special workshops’ that would follow identified in Francesco Saverio Nitti one of the main protagonists: de facto extender of the industrialist project for Naples, he was very critical of the traditional scheme launched for Basilicata, which he felt lacked the ambitiously industrialist breath that could have prevented the Province from being nailed once again to its primitive agrarian structures. In particular, starting from a reading of the historical context, the essay highlights common aspects and differences between the regulatory arrangements, touching on the issues that would be at the center of the political debate of the liberal era, such as the importance of technical studies and preliminary investigations, institutional aspects, the contrast between the industrial model linked to the «conquest of hydroelectric power» and the one connected to a more traditional matrix, based on agriculture and infrastructure. Overall, however, the essay tries to describe how, at the beginning of the twentieth century, a pioneering response to the so-called ‘Southern Question’ implied, beyond the unpredictable outcomes, also the attempt to break ancient immobilities, as well as an extraordinary commitment that best interpreted the spirit and meaning of the times. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T22:09:22Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c1e7ceeedf8c4d99bd9287bc98924cd5 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2610-9166 |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T22:09:22Z |
| publishDate | 2021-12-01 |
| publisher | Edizioni Università di Cassino |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Democrazia e Diritti Sociali |
| spelling | doaj.art-c1e7ceeedf8c4d99bd9287bc98924cd52023-07-23T16:22:20ZdeuEdizioni Università di CassinoDemocrazia e Diritti Sociali2610-91662021-12-01202124359Nitti e gli interventi speciali per il Mezzogiorno del 1904. Per una comparazione tra il caso napoletano e quello lucanoDonato VerrastroThe article proposes a comparative reading of the two extraordinary interventions on and for the Mezzogiorno promoted by Zanardelli and Giolitti, namely one for Basilicata (l. 140/1904) and the other for Naples (l. 351/1904). The ‘special workshops’ that would follow identified in Francesco Saverio Nitti one of the main protagonists: de facto extender of the industrialist project for Naples, he was very critical of the traditional scheme launched for Basilicata, which he felt lacked the ambitiously industrialist breath that could have prevented the Province from being nailed once again to its primitive agrarian structures. In particular, starting from a reading of the historical context, the essay highlights common aspects and differences between the regulatory arrangements, touching on the issues that would be at the center of the political debate of the liberal era, such as the importance of technical studies and preliminary investigations, institutional aspects, the contrast between the industrial model linked to the «conquest of hydroelectric power» and the one connected to a more traditional matrix, based on agriculture and infrastructure. Overall, however, the essay tries to describe how, at the beginning of the twentieth century, a pioneering response to the so-called ‘Southern Question’ implied, beyond the unpredictable outcomes, also the attempt to break ancient immobilities, as well as an extraordinary commitment that best interpreted the spirit and meaning of the times.https://www.democraziaedirittisociali.it/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Verrastro.pdf |
| spellingShingle | Donato Verrastro Nitti e gli interventi speciali per il Mezzogiorno del 1904. Per una comparazione tra il caso napoletano e quello lucano Democrazia e Diritti Sociali |
| title | Nitti e gli interventi speciali per il Mezzogiorno del 1904. Per una comparazione tra il caso napoletano e quello lucano |
| title_full | Nitti e gli interventi speciali per il Mezzogiorno del 1904. Per una comparazione tra il caso napoletano e quello lucano |
| title_fullStr | Nitti e gli interventi speciali per il Mezzogiorno del 1904. Per una comparazione tra il caso napoletano e quello lucano |
| title_full_unstemmed | Nitti e gli interventi speciali per il Mezzogiorno del 1904. Per una comparazione tra il caso napoletano e quello lucano |
| title_short | Nitti e gli interventi speciali per il Mezzogiorno del 1904. Per una comparazione tra il caso napoletano e quello lucano |
| title_sort | nitti e gli interventi speciali per il mezzogiorno del 1904 per una comparazione tra il caso napoletano e quello lucano |
| url | https://www.democraziaedirittisociali.it/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Verrastro.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT donatoverrastro nittiegliinterventispecialiperilmezzogiornodel1904perunacomparazionetrailcasonapoletanoequellolucano |