A Comparison of class I malocclusion treatment outcomes with and without extractions using an ABO grading system for dental casts and radiographs

Background: Class I malocclusion can be treated with or without resort to extraction. However, despite the indications, a controversy is still ongoing as to whether one option is preferable to another. One of the most frequent controversies centers on whether treatment involving extractions will pro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bunga Ayub Rukiah, Amalia Oeripto, Nurhayati Harahap
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Airlangga 2017-09-01
Series:Dental Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/MKG/article/view/5309
_version_ 1818907491868606464
author Bunga Ayub Rukiah
Amalia Oeripto
Nurhayati Harahap
author_facet Bunga Ayub Rukiah
Amalia Oeripto
Nurhayati Harahap
author_sort Bunga Ayub Rukiah
collection DOAJ
description Background: Class I malocclusion can be treated with or without resort to extraction. However, despite the indications, a controversy is still ongoing as to whether one option is preferable to another. One of the most frequent controversies centers on whether treatment involving extractions will produce superior results than treatment not culminating in extraction. Purpose: This study aimed to compare the results of treating class I malocclusion with extractions and those without extraction using an ABO grading system. Methods: Comparing ABO scores in patients’ dental casts and radiographs with class I malocclusion with and without extraction. Observational research incorporating case control methods was conducted involving 40 patients with class I malocclusion. Samples were divided into two groups, one treated with extraction (group E) and the other without extraction as the control group (K). The results of the treatment were measured and assessed using eight variables of the ABO Grading System. Results: The total score for the group treated with extractions was 23.65±7.82, while that for group K was 26.50±7.02. There was no significant difference in the total score between the two groups. Nevertheless, class I malocclusion treated with extraction had a lower score than without extraction. Conclusions: There was no difference in the total score of the ABO grading system for class I malocclusion patients treated with and without extractions.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T21:55:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c1e9a82249bf413d8cb6613a436ec67c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1978-3728
2442-9740
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T21:55:58Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher Universitas Airlangga
record_format Article
series Dental Journal
spelling doaj.art-c1e9a82249bf413d8cb6613a436ec67c2022-12-21T20:04:17ZengUniversitas AirlanggaDental Journal1978-37282442-97402017-09-0150314414810.20473/j.djmkg.v50.i3.p144-1483968A Comparison of class I malocclusion treatment outcomes with and without extractions using an ABO grading system for dental casts and radiographsBunga Ayub Rukiah0Amalia Oeripto1Nurhayati Harahap2Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Sumatera Utara, MedanFaculty of Dentistry, Universitas Sumatera Utara, MedanFaculty of Dentistry, Universitas Sumatera Utara, MedanBackground: Class I malocclusion can be treated with or without resort to extraction. However, despite the indications, a controversy is still ongoing as to whether one option is preferable to another. One of the most frequent controversies centers on whether treatment involving extractions will produce superior results than treatment not culminating in extraction. Purpose: This study aimed to compare the results of treating class I malocclusion with extractions and those without extraction using an ABO grading system. Methods: Comparing ABO scores in patients’ dental casts and radiographs with class I malocclusion with and without extraction. Observational research incorporating case control methods was conducted involving 40 patients with class I malocclusion. Samples were divided into two groups, one treated with extraction (group E) and the other without extraction as the control group (K). The results of the treatment were measured and assessed using eight variables of the ABO Grading System. Results: The total score for the group treated with extractions was 23.65±7.82, while that for group K was 26.50±7.02. There was no significant difference in the total score between the two groups. Nevertheless, class I malocclusion treated with extraction had a lower score than without extraction. Conclusions: There was no difference in the total score of the ABO grading system for class I malocclusion patients treated with and without extractions.https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/MKG/article/view/5309class I malocclusionextractionnon extractiongrading system ABO
spellingShingle Bunga Ayub Rukiah
Amalia Oeripto
Nurhayati Harahap
A Comparison of class I malocclusion treatment outcomes with and without extractions using an ABO grading system for dental casts and radiographs
Dental Journal
class I malocclusion
extraction
non extraction
grading system ABO
title A Comparison of class I malocclusion treatment outcomes with and without extractions using an ABO grading system for dental casts and radiographs
title_full A Comparison of class I malocclusion treatment outcomes with and without extractions using an ABO grading system for dental casts and radiographs
title_fullStr A Comparison of class I malocclusion treatment outcomes with and without extractions using an ABO grading system for dental casts and radiographs
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of class I malocclusion treatment outcomes with and without extractions using an ABO grading system for dental casts and radiographs
title_short A Comparison of class I malocclusion treatment outcomes with and without extractions using an ABO grading system for dental casts and radiographs
title_sort comparison of class i malocclusion treatment outcomes with and without extractions using an abo grading system for dental casts and radiographs
topic class I malocclusion
extraction
non extraction
grading system ABO
url https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/MKG/article/view/5309
work_keys_str_mv AT bungaayubrukiah acomparisonofclassimalocclusiontreatmentoutcomeswithandwithoutextractionsusinganabogradingsystemfordentalcastsandradiographs
AT amaliaoeripto acomparisonofclassimalocclusiontreatmentoutcomeswithandwithoutextractionsusinganabogradingsystemfordentalcastsandradiographs
AT nurhayatiharahap acomparisonofclassimalocclusiontreatmentoutcomeswithandwithoutextractionsusinganabogradingsystemfordentalcastsandradiographs
AT bungaayubrukiah comparisonofclassimalocclusiontreatmentoutcomeswithandwithoutextractionsusinganabogradingsystemfordentalcastsandradiographs
AT amaliaoeripto comparisonofclassimalocclusiontreatmentoutcomeswithandwithoutextractionsusinganabogradingsystemfordentalcastsandradiographs
AT nurhayatiharahap comparisonofclassimalocclusiontreatmentoutcomeswithandwithoutextractionsusinganabogradingsystemfordentalcastsandradiographs