Utility evaluation of two molecular methods for Leptospira spp. typing in human serum samples
Most of the available genotyping methods were applied and evaluated in Leptospira isolates and only few of them in a relevant sample size of blood specimens but not of sera. The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of one partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing assay (16S rRNA) and an optimi...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2023-02-01
|
| Series: | Heliyon |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240584402203852X |
| _version_ | 1811161864856403968 |
|---|---|
| author | Noelia Yolanda Landolt Yosena Teresita Chiani Nazarena Pujato Paulina Jacob María Fernanda Schmeling Guillermo García Effron Norma Bibiana Vanasco |
| author_facet | Noelia Yolanda Landolt Yosena Teresita Chiani Nazarena Pujato Paulina Jacob María Fernanda Schmeling Guillermo García Effron Norma Bibiana Vanasco |
| author_sort | Noelia Yolanda Landolt |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Most of the available genotyping methods were applied and evaluated in Leptospira isolates and only few of them in a relevant sample size of blood specimens but not of sera. The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of one partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing assay (16S rRNA) and an optimized. Multilocus sequence typing scheme (MLST) for Leptospira typing directly in serum samples. Confirmed leptospirosis patients (n = 228) from Argentina (2005–2016) were randomly included. Septicemic-phase serum samples (n = 228) were studied by two genotyping methods. Available immune-phase serum samples of the included patients (n = 159) were studied by MAT to compare serological and molecular results. In culture-proven cases (n = 8), genotyping results between clinical samples and isolates were compared. Typing success rate (TSR) was 21.9% for 16S rRNA and 11.4% for MLST (full allelic profile) and a positive trend in both TSR during the study period was observed. Two species (L. interrogans and L. borgpertesenii) were identified by both methods and MLST assigned 8 different STs. The probable serogroups identified by MLST were coincident with the presumptive infecting serogroups identified by MAT, but with different frequencies. The three serogroups (Canicola, Sejroe and Icterohaemorrhagiae) most frequently identified by MAT were also genotyped by MLST. Typing results via 16S rRNA and MLST in clinical samples and isolates of culture-proven cases, were consistent except for one case. Performance of partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing assay and the optimized MLST scheme directly in sera may increase and improve the knowledge about species and serogroups causing human leptospirosis, especially in countries with low rates of culture sample collection or Leptospira isolation. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T06:21:59Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c1f5d29595f54dc1b1f93de1f1bca630 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2405-8440 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T06:21:59Z |
| publishDate | 2023-02-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Heliyon |
| spelling | doaj.art-c1f5d29595f54dc1b1f93de1f1bca6302023-03-02T04:59:44ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402023-02-0192e12564Utility evaluation of two molecular methods for Leptospira spp. typing in human serum samplesNoelia Yolanda Landolt0Yosena Teresita Chiani1Nazarena Pujato2Paulina Jacob3María Fernanda Schmeling4Guillermo García Effron5Norma Bibiana Vanasco6Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias (INER “Dr. E. Coni”), Administración Nacional de Laboratorios e Institutos de Salud (ANLIS “Dr. C.G. Malbran”), Av. Blas Parera 8260, 3000 Santa Fe, ArgentinaInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias (INER “Dr. E. Coni”), Administración Nacional de Laboratorios e Institutos de Salud (ANLIS “Dr. C.G. Malbran”), Av. Blas Parera 8260, 3000 Santa Fe, ArgentinaInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias (INER “Dr. E. Coni”), Administración Nacional de Laboratorios e Institutos de Salud (ANLIS “Dr. C.G. Malbran”), Av. Blas Parera 8260, 3000 Santa Fe, Argentina; Laboratorio de Leptospirosis, Facultad de Bioquímica y Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Ciudad Universitaria, Paraje El Pozo, 3000 Santa Fe, ArgentinaInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias (INER “Dr. E. Coni”), Administración Nacional de Laboratorios e Institutos de Salud (ANLIS “Dr. C.G. Malbran”), Av. Blas Parera 8260, 3000 Santa Fe, Argentina; Laboratorio de Leptospirosis, Facultad de Bioquímica y Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Ciudad Universitaria, Paraje El Pozo, 3000 Santa Fe, ArgentinaInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias (INER “Dr. E. Coni”), Administración Nacional de Laboratorios e Institutos de Salud (ANLIS “Dr. C.G. Malbran”), Av. Blas Parera 8260, 3000 Santa Fe, ArgentinaLaboratorio de Micología y Diagnóstico Molecular, Cátedra de Parasitología y Micología, Facultad de Bioquímica y Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Ciudad Universitaria, Paraje El Pozo, 3000 Santa Fe, Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), CCT, Santa Fe, ArgentinaInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias (INER “Dr. E. Coni”), Administración Nacional de Laboratorios e Institutos de Salud (ANLIS “Dr. C.G. Malbran”), Av. Blas Parera 8260, 3000 Santa Fe, Argentina; Laboratorio de Leptospirosis, Facultad de Bioquímica y Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Ciudad Universitaria, Paraje El Pozo, 3000 Santa Fe, Argentina; Corresponding author.Most of the available genotyping methods were applied and evaluated in Leptospira isolates and only few of them in a relevant sample size of blood specimens but not of sera. The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of one partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing assay (16S rRNA) and an optimized. Multilocus sequence typing scheme (MLST) for Leptospira typing directly in serum samples. Confirmed leptospirosis patients (n = 228) from Argentina (2005–2016) were randomly included. Septicemic-phase serum samples (n = 228) were studied by two genotyping methods. Available immune-phase serum samples of the included patients (n = 159) were studied by MAT to compare serological and molecular results. In culture-proven cases (n = 8), genotyping results between clinical samples and isolates were compared. Typing success rate (TSR) was 21.9% for 16S rRNA and 11.4% for MLST (full allelic profile) and a positive trend in both TSR during the study period was observed. Two species (L. interrogans and L. borgpertesenii) were identified by both methods and MLST assigned 8 different STs. The probable serogroups identified by MLST were coincident with the presumptive infecting serogroups identified by MAT, but with different frequencies. The three serogroups (Canicola, Sejroe and Icterohaemorrhagiae) most frequently identified by MAT were also genotyped by MLST. Typing results via 16S rRNA and MLST in clinical samples and isolates of culture-proven cases, were consistent except for one case. Performance of partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing assay and the optimized MLST scheme directly in sera may increase and improve the knowledge about species and serogroups causing human leptospirosis, especially in countries with low rates of culture sample collection or Leptospira isolation.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240584402203852XLeptospiraTyping16S rRNAMLSTSerum |
| spellingShingle | Noelia Yolanda Landolt Yosena Teresita Chiani Nazarena Pujato Paulina Jacob María Fernanda Schmeling Guillermo García Effron Norma Bibiana Vanasco Utility evaluation of two molecular methods for Leptospira spp. typing in human serum samples Heliyon Leptospira Typing 16S rRNA MLST Serum |
| title | Utility evaluation of two molecular methods for Leptospira spp. typing in human serum samples |
| title_full | Utility evaluation of two molecular methods for Leptospira spp. typing in human serum samples |
| title_fullStr | Utility evaluation of two molecular methods for Leptospira spp. typing in human serum samples |
| title_full_unstemmed | Utility evaluation of two molecular methods for Leptospira spp. typing in human serum samples |
| title_short | Utility evaluation of two molecular methods for Leptospira spp. typing in human serum samples |
| title_sort | utility evaluation of two molecular methods for leptospira spp typing in human serum samples |
| topic | Leptospira Typing 16S rRNA MLST Serum |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240584402203852X |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT noeliayolandalandolt utilityevaluationoftwomolecularmethodsforleptospiraspptypinginhumanserumsamples AT yosenateresitachiani utilityevaluationoftwomolecularmethodsforleptospiraspptypinginhumanserumsamples AT nazarenapujato utilityevaluationoftwomolecularmethodsforleptospiraspptypinginhumanserumsamples AT paulinajacob utilityevaluationoftwomolecularmethodsforleptospiraspptypinginhumanserumsamples AT mariafernandaschmeling utilityevaluationoftwomolecularmethodsforleptospiraspptypinginhumanserumsamples AT guillermogarciaeffron utilityevaluationoftwomolecularmethodsforleptospiraspptypinginhumanserumsamples AT normabibianavanasco utilityevaluationoftwomolecularmethodsforleptospiraspptypinginhumanserumsamples |