Domination of Women? Gender Representation in the Corpus of Late Neolithic Anthropomorphic Figurines

Since the inception of the discipline of archaeology, figurines have been considered as the basis for research into the praehistoric social order and religious ideas. In spite of the numerous critiques, the idea that they are the reflection of adoration of Mother Goddess and fertility cults, has per...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jasna Vuković
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Belgrade 2021-11-01
Series:Etnoantropološki Problemi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.eap-iea.org/index.php/eap/article/view/200
_version_ 1811190739527270400
author Jasna Vuković
author_facet Jasna Vuković
author_sort Jasna Vuković
collection DOAJ
description Since the inception of the discipline of archaeology, figurines have been considered as the basis for research into the praehistoric social order and religious ideas. In spite of the numerous critiques, the idea that they are the reflection of adoration of Mother Goddess and fertility cults, has persevered even to the present day, mainly thanks to the work of Maria Gimbutas. Her simplified approach to praehistory, apart from giving rise to pseudo-archaeological narratives, has induced severe criticism and polemics inside archaeology. The concept of the Goddess has migrated during the recent period from the academic writing to the realm of pseudo-science, daily politics and activism. In our country, the ideas of the Golden Past, considered to be the origin of the European civilization, are particularly present in the „grey zone“: the public sphere, facilitated through media. All these narratives are based upon the preconception that in the Neolithic collections the representations of women dominate. The results of the preliminary analyses of gender representation in Neolithic assemblages have proven that the claims of women’s dominance are ill-founded, and emphasized once more the significant presence, or even dominance of asexual figurines. On the other hand, the criteria for identification have shown to be unreliable, raising the question of usefulness of such attempts, as well as a number of new questions. Primarily, the role and meaning of the presence/absence of secondary sex attributes, their correlation to age, as well as possible regional differences in meaning and function of figurines are discussed.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T14:55:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c208fb8013e446489953033b626ac9c2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0353-1589
2334-8801
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T14:55:17Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher University of Belgrade
record_format Article
series Etnoantropološki Problemi
spelling doaj.art-c208fb8013e446489953033b626ac9c22022-12-22T04:17:17ZengUniversity of BelgradeEtnoantropološki Problemi0353-15892334-88012021-11-0116310.21301/eap.v16i3.6Domination of Women? Gender Representation in the Corpus of Late Neolithic Anthropomorphic FigurinesJasna Vuković0Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of BelgradeSince the inception of the discipline of archaeology, figurines have been considered as the basis for research into the praehistoric social order and religious ideas. In spite of the numerous critiques, the idea that they are the reflection of adoration of Mother Goddess and fertility cults, has persevered even to the present day, mainly thanks to the work of Maria Gimbutas. Her simplified approach to praehistory, apart from giving rise to pseudo-archaeological narratives, has induced severe criticism and polemics inside archaeology. The concept of the Goddess has migrated during the recent period from the academic writing to the realm of pseudo-science, daily politics and activism. In our country, the ideas of the Golden Past, considered to be the origin of the European civilization, are particularly present in the „grey zone“: the public sphere, facilitated through media. All these narratives are based upon the preconception that in the Neolithic collections the representations of women dominate. The results of the preliminary analyses of gender representation in Neolithic assemblages have proven that the claims of women’s dominance are ill-founded, and emphasized once more the significant presence, or even dominance of asexual figurines. On the other hand, the criteria for identification have shown to be unreliable, raising the question of usefulness of such attempts, as well as a number of new questions. Primarily, the role and meaning of the presence/absence of secondary sex attributes, their correlation to age, as well as possible regional differences in meaning and function of figurines are discussed.https://www.eap-iea.org/index.php/eap/article/view/200anthropomorphic figurinesLate Neolithicrepresentation of gender/sexMother Goddessfertility cult
spellingShingle Jasna Vuković
Domination of Women? Gender Representation in the Corpus of Late Neolithic Anthropomorphic Figurines
Etnoantropološki Problemi
anthropomorphic figurines
Late Neolithic
representation of gender/sex
Mother Goddess
fertility cult
title Domination of Women? Gender Representation in the Corpus of Late Neolithic Anthropomorphic Figurines
title_full Domination of Women? Gender Representation in the Corpus of Late Neolithic Anthropomorphic Figurines
title_fullStr Domination of Women? Gender Representation in the Corpus of Late Neolithic Anthropomorphic Figurines
title_full_unstemmed Domination of Women? Gender Representation in the Corpus of Late Neolithic Anthropomorphic Figurines
title_short Domination of Women? Gender Representation in the Corpus of Late Neolithic Anthropomorphic Figurines
title_sort domination of women gender representation in the corpus of late neolithic anthropomorphic figurines
topic anthropomorphic figurines
Late Neolithic
representation of gender/sex
Mother Goddess
fertility cult
url https://www.eap-iea.org/index.php/eap/article/view/200
work_keys_str_mv AT jasnavukovic dominationofwomengenderrepresentationinthecorpusoflateneolithicanthropomorphicfigurines