Predicting coping with expectation violations: combining the ViolEx Model and the Covariation Principle

An experimental vignette study examined whether three specific situational cues predict ways of coping with violated expectations. The situational cues (consistency, distinctiveness, consensus) were derived from the Covariation Principle. The assessed coping strategies were based on the ViolEx Model...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martin Christian Pietzsch, Martin Pinquart
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1152261/full
_version_ 1827942661075501056
author Martin Christian Pietzsch
Martin Pinquart
author_facet Martin Christian Pietzsch
Martin Pinquart
author_sort Martin Christian Pietzsch
collection DOAJ
description An experimental vignette study examined whether three specific situational cues predict ways of coping with violated expectations. The situational cues (consistency, distinctiveness, consensus) were derived from the Covariation Principle. The assessed coping strategies were based on the ViolEx Model—assimilation (activities to fulfill one’s expectation), accommodation (expectation change) and immunization (ignoring the discrepant information). A sample of 124 adults (mean age = 23.60 years; 49.19 percent psychology students) were randomly assigned to an experimental and control condition. Participants of the experimental condition read several vignettes about expectation violations with systematically manipulated situational cues, while participants of the control condition received the same vignettes without such cues. Participants had to rate the usefulness of each coping strategy per vignette. The situational cues mostly led to response shifts in coping tendencies: Situations with low consistency cues mostly led to immunization, whereas high consistency led to assimilation in the case of high distinctiveness and to accommodation in the case of low distinctiveness. Consensus cues only played a minor part in the coping process. The results show that situational characteristics influence people’s coping behavior, regardless of their dispositional preferences for certain coping strategies.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T10:01:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c20c458313cc42a08b6479ca0c720c7c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T10:01:36Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-c20c458313cc42a08b6479ca0c720c7c2023-05-23T05:13:58ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782023-05-011410.3389/fpsyg.2023.11522611152261Predicting coping with expectation violations: combining the ViolEx Model and the Covariation PrincipleMartin Christian PietzschMartin PinquartAn experimental vignette study examined whether three specific situational cues predict ways of coping with violated expectations. The situational cues (consistency, distinctiveness, consensus) were derived from the Covariation Principle. The assessed coping strategies were based on the ViolEx Model—assimilation (activities to fulfill one’s expectation), accommodation (expectation change) and immunization (ignoring the discrepant information). A sample of 124 adults (mean age = 23.60 years; 49.19 percent psychology students) were randomly assigned to an experimental and control condition. Participants of the experimental condition read several vignettes about expectation violations with systematically manipulated situational cues, while participants of the control condition received the same vignettes without such cues. Participants had to rate the usefulness of each coping strategy per vignette. The situational cues mostly led to response shifts in coping tendencies: Situations with low consistency cues mostly led to immunization, whereas high consistency led to assimilation in the case of high distinctiveness and to accommodation in the case of low distinctiveness. Consensus cues only played a minor part in the coping process. The results show that situational characteristics influence people’s coping behavior, regardless of their dispositional preferences for certain coping strategies.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1152261/fullViolEx Modelexpectation violationCovariation Principlevignette studyexperimentassimilation
spellingShingle Martin Christian Pietzsch
Martin Pinquart
Predicting coping with expectation violations: combining the ViolEx Model and the Covariation Principle
Frontiers in Psychology
ViolEx Model
expectation violation
Covariation Principle
vignette study
experiment
assimilation
title Predicting coping with expectation violations: combining the ViolEx Model and the Covariation Principle
title_full Predicting coping with expectation violations: combining the ViolEx Model and the Covariation Principle
title_fullStr Predicting coping with expectation violations: combining the ViolEx Model and the Covariation Principle
title_full_unstemmed Predicting coping with expectation violations: combining the ViolEx Model and the Covariation Principle
title_short Predicting coping with expectation violations: combining the ViolEx Model and the Covariation Principle
title_sort predicting coping with expectation violations combining the violex model and the covariation principle
topic ViolEx Model
expectation violation
Covariation Principle
vignette study
experiment
assimilation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1152261/full
work_keys_str_mv AT martinchristianpietzsch predictingcopingwithexpectationviolationscombiningtheviolexmodelandthecovariationprinciple
AT martinpinquart predictingcopingwithexpectationviolationscombiningtheviolexmodelandthecovariationprinciple