Modifiable Lifestyle Factors and Cognitive Function in Older People: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study

Background: The development of evidence-based interventions for delaying or preventing cognitive impairment is an important challenge. Most previous studies using self-report questionnaires face problems with reliability and consistency due to recall bias or misclassification among older people. The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Noriyuki Kimura, Yasuhiro Aso, Kenichi Yabuuchi, Masato Ishibashi, Daiji Hori, Yuuki Sasaki, Atsuhito Nakamichi, Souhei Uesugi, Hideyasu Fujioka, Shintaro Iwao, Mika Jikumaru, Tetsuji Katayama, Kaori Sumi, Atsuko Eguchi, Satoshi Nonaka, Masakazu Kakumu, Etsuro Matsubara
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2019.00401/full
_version_ 1818191759310585856
author Noriyuki Kimura
Yasuhiro Aso
Kenichi Yabuuchi
Masato Ishibashi
Daiji Hori
Yuuki Sasaki
Atsuhito Nakamichi
Souhei Uesugi
Hideyasu Fujioka
Shintaro Iwao
Mika Jikumaru
Tetsuji Katayama
Kaori Sumi
Atsuko Eguchi
Satoshi Nonaka
Masakazu Kakumu
Etsuro Matsubara
author_facet Noriyuki Kimura
Yasuhiro Aso
Kenichi Yabuuchi
Masato Ishibashi
Daiji Hori
Yuuki Sasaki
Atsuhito Nakamichi
Souhei Uesugi
Hideyasu Fujioka
Shintaro Iwao
Mika Jikumaru
Tetsuji Katayama
Kaori Sumi
Atsuko Eguchi
Satoshi Nonaka
Masakazu Kakumu
Etsuro Matsubara
author_sort Noriyuki Kimura
collection DOAJ
description Background: The development of evidence-based interventions for delaying or preventing cognitive impairment is an important challenge. Most previous studies using self-report questionnaires face problems with reliability and consistency due to recall bias or misclassification among older people. Therefore, objective measurement of lifestyle components is needed to confirm the relationships between lifestyle factors and cognitive function.Aims: The current study examined the relationship between lifestyle factors collected with wearable sensors and cognitive function among community-dwelling older people using machine learning.Methods: In total, 855 participants (mean age: 73.8 years) wore a wristband sensor for 7.8 days on average every 3 months. Various lifestyle parameters were measured, including walking steps, conversation time, total sleep time (TST), sleep efficiency, time awake after sleep onset, awakening count, napping time, and heart rate. Random forest (RF) regression analysis was used to examine the relationships between total daily sensing data and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. Confounding factor analysis was conducted with models that were adjusted and unadjusted for demographic and vascular risk factors, and selected variables were assessed as risk and protective factors using partial dependence plots (PDPs).Results: Lifestyle data were collected for 31.3 ± 7.1 days per year using wristband sensors. RF regression analysis adjusted for age, gender, and education levels selected four variables, including number of walking steps, conversation time, TST, and heart rate. Moreover, walking steps, conversation time, and heart rate remained after RF regression analysis adjusted for demographic and vascular risk factors. Number of walking steps, conversation time, and heart rate were categorized as protective factors, whereas TST was categorized as a risk factor for cognitive function. Although PDPs of number of walking steps and heart rate revealed continuously increased MMSE scores, those of conversation time and TST and revealed that the tendency in the graph was reversed at the boundary of a particular threshold (321.1 min for conversation time, 434.1 min for TST).Conclusions: Lifestyle factors, such as physical activity, sleep, and social activity appear to be associated with cognitive function among older people. Physical activity and appropriate durations of sleep and conversation are important for cognitive function.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T00:19:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c218a0d35df646b2b93fa3997820171b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-2295
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T00:19:43Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neurology
spelling doaj.art-c218a0d35df646b2b93fa3997820171b2022-12-22T00:44:45ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952019-04-011010.3389/fneur.2019.00401435893Modifiable Lifestyle Factors and Cognitive Function in Older People: A Cross-Sectional Observational StudyNoriyuki Kimura0Yasuhiro Aso1Kenichi Yabuuchi2Masato Ishibashi3Daiji Hori4Yuuki Sasaki5Atsuhito Nakamichi6Souhei Uesugi7Hideyasu Fujioka8Shintaro Iwao9Mika Jikumaru10Tetsuji Katayama11Kaori Sumi12Atsuko Eguchi13Satoshi Nonaka14Masakazu Kakumu15Etsuro Matsubara16Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, JapanDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, JapanDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, JapanDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, JapanDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, JapanDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, JapanDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, JapanDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, JapanDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, JapanDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, JapanDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, JapanDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, JapanDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, JapanDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, JapanTDK Corporation, Tokyo, JapanTDK Corporation, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, JapanBackground: The development of evidence-based interventions for delaying or preventing cognitive impairment is an important challenge. Most previous studies using self-report questionnaires face problems with reliability and consistency due to recall bias or misclassification among older people. Therefore, objective measurement of lifestyle components is needed to confirm the relationships between lifestyle factors and cognitive function.Aims: The current study examined the relationship between lifestyle factors collected with wearable sensors and cognitive function among community-dwelling older people using machine learning.Methods: In total, 855 participants (mean age: 73.8 years) wore a wristband sensor for 7.8 days on average every 3 months. Various lifestyle parameters were measured, including walking steps, conversation time, total sleep time (TST), sleep efficiency, time awake after sleep onset, awakening count, napping time, and heart rate. Random forest (RF) regression analysis was used to examine the relationships between total daily sensing data and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. Confounding factor analysis was conducted with models that were adjusted and unadjusted for demographic and vascular risk factors, and selected variables were assessed as risk and protective factors using partial dependence plots (PDPs).Results: Lifestyle data were collected for 31.3 ± 7.1 days per year using wristband sensors. RF regression analysis adjusted for age, gender, and education levels selected four variables, including number of walking steps, conversation time, TST, and heart rate. Moreover, walking steps, conversation time, and heart rate remained after RF regression analysis adjusted for demographic and vascular risk factors. Number of walking steps, conversation time, and heart rate were categorized as protective factors, whereas TST was categorized as a risk factor for cognitive function. Although PDPs of number of walking steps and heart rate revealed continuously increased MMSE scores, those of conversation time and TST and revealed that the tendency in the graph was reversed at the boundary of a particular threshold (321.1 min for conversation time, 434.1 min for TST).Conclusions: Lifestyle factors, such as physical activity, sleep, and social activity appear to be associated with cognitive function among older people. Physical activity and appropriate durations of sleep and conversation are important for cognitive function.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2019.00401/fullcross-sectional studylifestyle factorscognitive functionwearable sensormini-mental state examinationrandom forest regression analysis
spellingShingle Noriyuki Kimura
Yasuhiro Aso
Kenichi Yabuuchi
Masato Ishibashi
Daiji Hori
Yuuki Sasaki
Atsuhito Nakamichi
Souhei Uesugi
Hideyasu Fujioka
Shintaro Iwao
Mika Jikumaru
Tetsuji Katayama
Kaori Sumi
Atsuko Eguchi
Satoshi Nonaka
Masakazu Kakumu
Etsuro Matsubara
Modifiable Lifestyle Factors and Cognitive Function in Older People: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study
Frontiers in Neurology
cross-sectional study
lifestyle factors
cognitive function
wearable sensor
mini-mental state examination
random forest regression analysis
title Modifiable Lifestyle Factors and Cognitive Function in Older People: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study
title_full Modifiable Lifestyle Factors and Cognitive Function in Older People: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study
title_fullStr Modifiable Lifestyle Factors and Cognitive Function in Older People: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Modifiable Lifestyle Factors and Cognitive Function in Older People: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study
title_short Modifiable Lifestyle Factors and Cognitive Function in Older People: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study
title_sort modifiable lifestyle factors and cognitive function in older people a cross sectional observational study
topic cross-sectional study
lifestyle factors
cognitive function
wearable sensor
mini-mental state examination
random forest regression analysis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2019.00401/full
work_keys_str_mv AT noriyukikimura modifiablelifestylefactorsandcognitivefunctioninolderpeopleacrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT yasuhiroaso modifiablelifestylefactorsandcognitivefunctioninolderpeopleacrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT kenichiyabuuchi modifiablelifestylefactorsandcognitivefunctioninolderpeopleacrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT masatoishibashi modifiablelifestylefactorsandcognitivefunctioninolderpeopleacrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT daijihori modifiablelifestylefactorsandcognitivefunctioninolderpeopleacrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT yuukisasaki modifiablelifestylefactorsandcognitivefunctioninolderpeopleacrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT atsuhitonakamichi modifiablelifestylefactorsandcognitivefunctioninolderpeopleacrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT souheiuesugi modifiablelifestylefactorsandcognitivefunctioninolderpeopleacrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT hideyasufujioka modifiablelifestylefactorsandcognitivefunctioninolderpeopleacrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT shintaroiwao modifiablelifestylefactorsandcognitivefunctioninolderpeopleacrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT mikajikumaru modifiablelifestylefactorsandcognitivefunctioninolderpeopleacrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT tetsujikatayama modifiablelifestylefactorsandcognitivefunctioninolderpeopleacrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT kaorisumi modifiablelifestylefactorsandcognitivefunctioninolderpeopleacrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT atsukoeguchi modifiablelifestylefactorsandcognitivefunctioninolderpeopleacrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT satoshinonaka modifiablelifestylefactorsandcognitivefunctioninolderpeopleacrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT masakazukakumu modifiablelifestylefactorsandcognitivefunctioninolderpeopleacrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT etsuromatsubara modifiablelifestylefactorsandcognitivefunctioninolderpeopleacrosssectionalobservationalstudy