| Summary: | Currently, laparoscopic pyeloplasty is gaining popularity in pediatric urology due to less invasive compared to the open standard pyeloplasty. Nevertheless, there are basic “critical” remarks about this pyeloplasty technique in children, which involve some difficulties in comparing tissues and intracorporeal suturing due to the limited available space. In addition, a significant negative point of laparoscopic pyeloplasty is the duration of the operation, especially in the younger age group of children. Despite all the advantages associated with minimal invasiveness, there are alternative methods of surgical treatment, which show quite impressive results. In our practical work, we performed minimally invasive open pyeloplasty: with a miniature incision, in a child with ureteropelvic junction obstruction with a good result. In addition, this access provides a wide exposure of the ureteropelvic junction and easy tissue manipulation.
|
|---|