Abstract Number ‐ 82: Central Retinal Artery Metallic Embolus After Ophthalmic Segment Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm Flow‐diverter Embolization

Introduction Flow‐diverting stents are effective devices in treating what would have previously been difficult to treat aneurysms such as wide‐necked, fusiform, blood blister, or giant aneurysms. Although generally safe, complications have been reported such as ischemia, in‐stent stenosis, and side...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thymur A Chaudhry, David Niemann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-03-01
Series:Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/SVIN.03.suppl_1.082
_version_ 1797803553675280384
author Thymur A Chaudhry
David Niemann
author_facet Thymur A Chaudhry
David Niemann
author_sort Thymur A Chaudhry
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Flow‐diverting stents are effective devices in treating what would have previously been difficult to treat aneurysms such as wide‐necked, fusiform, blood blister, or giant aneurysms. Although generally safe, complications have been reported such as ischemia, in‐stent stenosis, and side branch occlusion, as well as device related complications such as stent migration and incomplete expansion. We present a case report of a patient who was incidentally found to have a reflective metallic embolus within the central retinal artery after two flow‐diverter stent embolization of the ipsilateral ophthalmic segment aneurysm. Methods Case report. Results A 44 year‐old female presented with incidental discovery of a 4mm paraopthalmic aneurysm. She underwent two flow‐diverter (Pipeline ©) embolizations with decreased although persistent filling of the aneurysm sac. After the second embolization procedure, the patient was referred to Opthalmology after incidental note of a small submillimeter reflective metallic embolus adjacent to the fovea seen on a screening Optometry exam upon workup for reader glasses. The patient was asymptomatic without visual complaints, blurriness, floaters, or change in vision. Conclusions We present a case of a tiny submillimeter reflective metallic embolus after flow‐diverter stent placement within the ipsilateral ophthalmic artery. This is the first report we are aware of describing such a complication after the use of flow‐diverter stent deployment. It is possible that the increased friction from two apposing stents could cause microfractures and subclinical emboli.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T05:22:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c22dfb1c5e424812ba90f6c378e59550
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2694-5746
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T05:22:34Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
spelling doaj.art-c22dfb1c5e424812ba90f6c378e595502023-06-15T10:40:49ZengWileyStroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology2694-57462023-03-013S110.1161/SVIN.03.suppl_1.082Abstract Number ‐ 82: Central Retinal Artery Metallic Embolus After Ophthalmic Segment Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm Flow‐diverter EmbolizationThymur A Chaudhry0David Niemann1University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin United States of AmericaUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin United States of AmericaIntroduction Flow‐diverting stents are effective devices in treating what would have previously been difficult to treat aneurysms such as wide‐necked, fusiform, blood blister, or giant aneurysms. Although generally safe, complications have been reported such as ischemia, in‐stent stenosis, and side branch occlusion, as well as device related complications such as stent migration and incomplete expansion. We present a case report of a patient who was incidentally found to have a reflective metallic embolus within the central retinal artery after two flow‐diverter stent embolization of the ipsilateral ophthalmic segment aneurysm. Methods Case report. Results A 44 year‐old female presented with incidental discovery of a 4mm paraopthalmic aneurysm. She underwent two flow‐diverter (Pipeline ©) embolizations with decreased although persistent filling of the aneurysm sac. After the second embolization procedure, the patient was referred to Opthalmology after incidental note of a small submillimeter reflective metallic embolus adjacent to the fovea seen on a screening Optometry exam upon workup for reader glasses. The patient was asymptomatic without visual complaints, blurriness, floaters, or change in vision. Conclusions We present a case of a tiny submillimeter reflective metallic embolus after flow‐diverter stent placement within the ipsilateral ophthalmic artery. This is the first report we are aware of describing such a complication after the use of flow‐diverter stent deployment. It is possible that the increased friction from two apposing stents could cause microfractures and subclinical emboli.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/SVIN.03.suppl_1.082
spellingShingle Thymur A Chaudhry
David Niemann
Abstract Number ‐ 82: Central Retinal Artery Metallic Embolus After Ophthalmic Segment Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm Flow‐diverter Embolization
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
title Abstract Number ‐ 82: Central Retinal Artery Metallic Embolus After Ophthalmic Segment Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm Flow‐diverter Embolization
title_full Abstract Number ‐ 82: Central Retinal Artery Metallic Embolus After Ophthalmic Segment Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm Flow‐diverter Embolization
title_fullStr Abstract Number ‐ 82: Central Retinal Artery Metallic Embolus After Ophthalmic Segment Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm Flow‐diverter Embolization
title_full_unstemmed Abstract Number ‐ 82: Central Retinal Artery Metallic Embolus After Ophthalmic Segment Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm Flow‐diverter Embolization
title_short Abstract Number ‐ 82: Central Retinal Artery Metallic Embolus After Ophthalmic Segment Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm Flow‐diverter Embolization
title_sort abstract number 82 central retinal artery metallic embolus after ophthalmic segment internal carotid artery aneurysm flow diverter embolization
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/SVIN.03.suppl_1.082
work_keys_str_mv AT thymurachaudhry abstractnumber82centralretinalarterymetallicembolusafterophthalmicsegmentinternalcarotidarteryaneurysmflowdiverterembolization
AT davidniemann abstractnumber82centralretinalarterymetallicembolusafterophthalmicsegmentinternalcarotidarteryaneurysmflowdiverterembolization