Efficacy of Two Streptokinase Formulations in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the different trade forms of streptokinase available in our country, namely Heberkinasa (Heberbiotec, Havana, Cuba) and Streptase (Aventis Behring GmbH, Marburg, Germany). Methods: We conducted a double-blind randomized clinical trial to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mojtaba Salarifar, Saeed Sadeghian, Ali Abbasi, Gholamreza Davoodi, Alireza Amirzadegan, Seyed Kianoosh Hosseini, Navid Paydari, Aida Biria, Parisa Moemeni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2009-01-01
Series:Journal of Tehran University Heart Center
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jthc.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jthc/article/view/116
_version_ 1828427981558644736
author Mojtaba Salarifar
Saeed Sadeghian
Ali Abbasi
Gholamreza Davoodi
Alireza Amirzadegan
Seyed Kianoosh Hosseini
Navid Paydari
Aida Biria
Parisa Moemeni
author_facet Mojtaba Salarifar
Saeed Sadeghian
Ali Abbasi
Gholamreza Davoodi
Alireza Amirzadegan
Seyed Kianoosh Hosseini
Navid Paydari
Aida Biria
Parisa Moemeni
author_sort Mojtaba Salarifar
collection DOAJ
description Background: We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the different trade forms of streptokinase available in our country, namely Heberkinasa (Heberbiotec, Havana, Cuba) and Streptase (Aventis Behring GmbH, Marburg, Germany). Methods: We conducted a double-blind randomized clinical trial to compare the two streptokinase formulations, i.e. Heberkinasa (HBK) or Streptase (STP), in patients with acute myocardial infarction who needed thrombolysis. Thrombolysis success was evaluated angiographically and/or clinically. Clinical follow-up was done 30 days after thrombolysis. Results: We randomly allocated 221 patients with a mean age of 56.9±10.8 years (males: 88.2%) to HBK (n=119) and STP (n=102) groups. Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups, and the two groups were not significantly different in terms of door-to-needle and pain-to-needle intervals. The rate of complications was not significantly different between the groups (44.1% [HBK] vs. 42% [STP]). Angiography was done for 158 (71.5 %) patients in the first 24 hours (9%) and in the first 72 hours (38.8%) after thrombolysis. Lesion morphology and lesion/patient ratio were not significantly different between the two groups (1.87[HBK] vs. 1.67[STP]). The two groups were similar with respect to angiographic patency rate (67.5% [HBK] vs. 67.6% [STP]). The study groups were also similar as regards clinical outcome and complications of both streptokinase formulations.  Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that Heberkinasa is as effective and as safe as a standard streptokinase, namely Streptase, in a clinical setting.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T17:11:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c234fc9098b54741ad4fa4f5b9ca6d06
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1735-8620
2008-2371
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T17:11:04Z
publishDate 2009-01-01
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Journal of Tehran University Heart Center
spelling doaj.art-c234fc9098b54741ad4fa4f5b9ca6d062022-12-22T01:40:19ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesJournal of Tehran University Heart Center1735-86202008-23712009-01-0141114Efficacy of Two Streptokinase Formulations in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical TrialMojtaba Salarifar0Saeed Sadeghian1Ali Abbasi2Gholamreza Davoodi3Alireza Amirzadegan4Seyed Kianoosh Hosseini5Navid Paydari6Aida Biria7Parisa Moemeni8Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Background: We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the different trade forms of streptokinase available in our country, namely Heberkinasa (Heberbiotec, Havana, Cuba) and Streptase (Aventis Behring GmbH, Marburg, Germany). Methods: We conducted a double-blind randomized clinical trial to compare the two streptokinase formulations, i.e. Heberkinasa (HBK) or Streptase (STP), in patients with acute myocardial infarction who needed thrombolysis. Thrombolysis success was evaluated angiographically and/or clinically. Clinical follow-up was done 30 days after thrombolysis. Results: We randomly allocated 221 patients with a mean age of 56.9±10.8 years (males: 88.2%) to HBK (n=119) and STP (n=102) groups. Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups, and the two groups were not significantly different in terms of door-to-needle and pain-to-needle intervals. The rate of complications was not significantly different between the groups (44.1% [HBK] vs. 42% [STP]). Angiography was done for 158 (71.5 %) patients in the first 24 hours (9%) and in the first 72 hours (38.8%) after thrombolysis. Lesion morphology and lesion/patient ratio were not significantly different between the two groups (1.87[HBK] vs. 1.67[STP]). The two groups were similar with respect to angiographic patency rate (67.5% [HBK] vs. 67.6% [STP]). The study groups were also similar as regards clinical outcome and complications of both streptokinase formulations.  Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that Heberkinasa is as effective and as safe as a standard streptokinase, namely Streptase, in a clinical setting.https://jthc.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jthc/article/view/116StreptokinaseThrombolytic therapyMyocardial infarction
spellingShingle Mojtaba Salarifar
Saeed Sadeghian
Ali Abbasi
Gholamreza Davoodi
Alireza Amirzadegan
Seyed Kianoosh Hosseini
Navid Paydari
Aida Biria
Parisa Moemeni
Efficacy of Two Streptokinase Formulations in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
Journal of Tehran University Heart Center
Streptokinase
Thrombolytic therapy
Myocardial infarction
title Efficacy of Two Streptokinase Formulations in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Efficacy of Two Streptokinase Formulations in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of Two Streptokinase Formulations in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Two Streptokinase Formulations in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Efficacy of Two Streptokinase Formulations in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort efficacy of two streptokinase formulations in acute myocardial infarction a double blind randomized clinical trial
topic Streptokinase
Thrombolytic therapy
Myocardial infarction
url https://jthc.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jthc/article/view/116
work_keys_str_mv AT mojtabasalarifar efficacyoftwostreptokinaseformulationsinacutemyocardialinfarctionadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT saeedsadeghian efficacyoftwostreptokinaseformulationsinacutemyocardialinfarctionadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT aliabbasi efficacyoftwostreptokinaseformulationsinacutemyocardialinfarctionadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT gholamrezadavoodi efficacyoftwostreptokinaseformulationsinacutemyocardialinfarctionadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT alirezaamirzadegan efficacyoftwostreptokinaseformulationsinacutemyocardialinfarctionadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT seyedkianooshhosseini efficacyoftwostreptokinaseformulationsinacutemyocardialinfarctionadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT navidpaydari efficacyoftwostreptokinaseformulationsinacutemyocardialinfarctionadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT aidabiria efficacyoftwostreptokinaseformulationsinacutemyocardialinfarctionadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT parisamoemeni efficacyoftwostreptokinaseformulationsinacutemyocardialinfarctionadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial