Trigger mechanism and dynamic causes of the Taiwan earthquake sequence on September 17, 2022

On September 17th and 18th, 2022, two earthquakes struck Taiwan Province of China in Taitung County and Hualien County, respectively, measuring MS6.5 and MS6.9 in magnitude, followed by multiple aftershocks. Both seismic events were situated along the Longitudinal Valley Fault and exhibited a revers...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: HUANG Shaohua, WAN Yongge, FENG Gan, LI Xiao, GUAN Zhaoxuan
Format: Article
Language:zho
Published: Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences 2023-10-01
Series:Dizhi lixue xuebao
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.geomech.ac.cn//article/doi/10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2023056
_version_ 1797352448694681600
author HUANG Shaohua
WAN Yongge
FENG Gan
LI Xiao
GUAN Zhaoxuan
author_facet HUANG Shaohua
WAN Yongge
FENG Gan
LI Xiao
GUAN Zhaoxuan
author_sort HUANG Shaohua
collection DOAJ
description On September 17th and 18th, 2022, two earthquakes struck Taiwan Province of China in Taitung County and Hualien County, respectively, measuring MS6.5 and MS6.9 in magnitude, followed by multiple aftershocks. Both seismic events were situated along the Longitudinal Valley Fault and exhibited a reverse strike-slip mechanism. The geological setting in this area is intricate, as the Longitudinal Valley Fault zone represents a subduction zone where the late Mesozoic Paleo-Pacific plate converges with the East Asian continental margin, resulting in a predominant thrust-type tectonic stress background. However, historical earthquake data in this region have indicated a prevalence of reverse-faulting earthquakes. To address the causes of these reverse strike-slip fault earthquakes and their relationship with the tectonic stress field in the area, we first reconstructed the tectonic stress field by analyzing the focal mechanisms of past earthquakes within the study area. The resulting stress field was characterized by compressive stress oriented with an azimuth of NWW. Subsequently, this stress field was projected onto fault planes with various strike and dip angles. This analysis revealed that certain fault joints experienced more significant relative shear stress and lower relative normal stress, suggesting that these joints were more prone to dislocation, leading to earthquakes of the reverse fault type, reverse strike-slip type, and strike-slip type. Furthermore, the proximity and timing of the two earthquakes within a two-day span prompted an examination of their potential triggering relationship. Researchers calculated the Coulomb rupture stress changes caused by the MS6.5 earthquake on the rupture plane of the MS6.9 earthquake and its sliding direction. Their analysis indicated an increase of approximately 0.02 MPa in Coulomb rupture stress, suggesting that the Taitung MS6.5 earthquake may have triggered the Hualien MS6.9 earthquake. This study holds significant importance for understanding the seismogenic mechanism of the Longitudinal Valley Fault and gaining insights into the geodynamics of the study region.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T13:16:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c251f95dc8ba47f99f50a2cc1e4daab5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1006-6616
language zho
last_indexed 2024-03-08T13:16:41Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences
record_format Article
series Dizhi lixue xuebao
spelling doaj.art-c251f95dc8ba47f99f50a2cc1e4daab52024-01-18T06:51:52ZzhoInstitute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological SciencesDizhi lixue xuebao1006-66162023-10-0129567468410.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2023056Trigger mechanism and dynamic causes of the Taiwan earthquake sequence on September 17, 2022HUANG Shaohua0WAN YonggeFENG Gan1LI Xiao2GUAN Zhaoxuan3School of Geosciences, Institute of Disaster Prevention, Sanhe 065201, Hebei, ChinaSchool of Geosciences, Institute of Disaster Prevention, Sanhe 065201, Hebei, ChinaSchool of Geosciences, Institute of Disaster Prevention, Sanhe 065201, Hebei, ChinaSchool of Geosciences, Institute of Disaster Prevention, Sanhe 065201, Hebei, ChinaOn September 17th and 18th, 2022, two earthquakes struck Taiwan Province of China in Taitung County and Hualien County, respectively, measuring MS6.5 and MS6.9 in magnitude, followed by multiple aftershocks. Both seismic events were situated along the Longitudinal Valley Fault and exhibited a reverse strike-slip mechanism. The geological setting in this area is intricate, as the Longitudinal Valley Fault zone represents a subduction zone where the late Mesozoic Paleo-Pacific plate converges with the East Asian continental margin, resulting in a predominant thrust-type tectonic stress background. However, historical earthquake data in this region have indicated a prevalence of reverse-faulting earthquakes. To address the causes of these reverse strike-slip fault earthquakes and their relationship with the tectonic stress field in the area, we first reconstructed the tectonic stress field by analyzing the focal mechanisms of past earthquakes within the study area. The resulting stress field was characterized by compressive stress oriented with an azimuth of NWW. Subsequently, this stress field was projected onto fault planes with various strike and dip angles. This analysis revealed that certain fault joints experienced more significant relative shear stress and lower relative normal stress, suggesting that these joints were more prone to dislocation, leading to earthquakes of the reverse fault type, reverse strike-slip type, and strike-slip type. Furthermore, the proximity and timing of the two earthquakes within a two-day span prompted an examination of their potential triggering relationship. Researchers calculated the Coulomb rupture stress changes caused by the MS6.5 earthquake on the rupture plane of the MS6.9 earthquake and its sliding direction. Their analysis indicated an increase of approximately 0.02 MPa in Coulomb rupture stress, suggesting that the Taitung MS6.5 earthquake may have triggered the Hualien MS6.9 earthquake. This study holds significant importance for understanding the seismogenic mechanism of the Longitudinal Valley Fault and gaining insights into the geodynamics of the study region.https://journal.geomech.ac.cn//article/doi/10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2023056longitudinal valley faultstress fieldstress systemcoulomb failure stress
spellingShingle HUANG Shaohua
WAN Yongge
FENG Gan
LI Xiao
GUAN Zhaoxuan
Trigger mechanism and dynamic causes of the Taiwan earthquake sequence on September 17, 2022
Dizhi lixue xuebao
longitudinal valley fault
stress field
stress system
coulomb failure stress
title Trigger mechanism and dynamic causes of the Taiwan earthquake sequence on September 17, 2022
title_full Trigger mechanism and dynamic causes of the Taiwan earthquake sequence on September 17, 2022
title_fullStr Trigger mechanism and dynamic causes of the Taiwan earthquake sequence on September 17, 2022
title_full_unstemmed Trigger mechanism and dynamic causes of the Taiwan earthquake sequence on September 17, 2022
title_short Trigger mechanism and dynamic causes of the Taiwan earthquake sequence on September 17, 2022
title_sort trigger mechanism and dynamic causes of the taiwan earthquake sequence on september 17 2022
topic longitudinal valley fault
stress field
stress system
coulomb failure stress
url https://journal.geomech.ac.cn//article/doi/10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2023056
work_keys_str_mv AT huangshaohua triggermechanismanddynamiccausesofthetaiwanearthquakesequenceonseptember172022
AT wanyongge triggermechanismanddynamiccausesofthetaiwanearthquakesequenceonseptember172022
AT fenggan triggermechanismanddynamiccausesofthetaiwanearthquakesequenceonseptember172022
AT lixiao triggermechanismanddynamiccausesofthetaiwanearthquakesequenceonseptember172022
AT guanzhaoxuan triggermechanismanddynamiccausesofthetaiwanearthquakesequenceonseptember172022