ASSERTION AND ASSESSMENT SENSITIVITY
ABSTRACT Gareth Evans (1985) and Sven Rosenkranz (2008) have respectively formulated two objections to truth relativism that would show that this view does not cohere with our practice of asserting. I argue that the relativist should answer such objections by appealing to the notion of assessment s...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
2019-08-01
|
Series: | Kriterion |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-512X2019000200355&tlng=en |
_version_ | 1818974950970621952 |
---|---|
author | Matías Gariazzo |
author_facet | Matías Gariazzo |
author_sort | Matías Gariazzo |
collection | DOAJ |
description | ABSTRACT Gareth Evans (1985) and Sven Rosenkranz (2008) have respectively formulated two objections to truth relativism that would show that this view does not cohere with our practice of asserting. I argue that the relativist should answer such objections by appealing to the notion of assessment sensitivity. Since the relativist accounts for this notion by means of a technical truth predicate relating propositions to contexts of assessment, the task left to her turns out to be to make sense of assessment sensitivity by making sense of this predicate (i.e. by showing that it expresses a truth notion). |
first_indexed | 2024-12-20T15:48:12Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-c253cd08b12e444b90e17d75b8d25191 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0100-512X |
language | deu |
last_indexed | 2024-12-20T15:48:12Z |
publishDate | 2019-08-01 |
publisher | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
record_format | Article |
series | Kriterion |
spelling | doaj.art-c253cd08b12e444b90e17d75b8d251912022-12-21T19:34:49ZdeuUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisKriterion0100-512X2019-08-016014335537610.1590/0100-512x2019n14307mgASSERTION AND ASSESSMENT SENSITIVITYMatías Gariazzohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6346-8386ABSTRACT Gareth Evans (1985) and Sven Rosenkranz (2008) have respectively formulated two objections to truth relativism that would show that this view does not cohere with our practice of asserting. I argue that the relativist should answer such objections by appealing to the notion of assessment sensitivity. Since the relativist accounts for this notion by means of a technical truth predicate relating propositions to contexts of assessment, the task left to her turns out to be to make sense of assessment sensitivity by making sense of this predicate (i.e. by showing that it expresses a truth notion).http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-512X2019000200355&tlng=enAssertiontruth relativismassessment sensitivitymonadic truthnon-monadic truth |
spellingShingle | Matías Gariazzo ASSERTION AND ASSESSMENT SENSITIVITY Kriterion Assertion truth relativism assessment sensitivity monadic truth non-monadic truth |
title | ASSERTION AND ASSESSMENT SENSITIVITY |
title_full | ASSERTION AND ASSESSMENT SENSITIVITY |
title_fullStr | ASSERTION AND ASSESSMENT SENSITIVITY |
title_full_unstemmed | ASSERTION AND ASSESSMENT SENSITIVITY |
title_short | ASSERTION AND ASSESSMENT SENSITIVITY |
title_sort | assertion and assessment sensitivity |
topic | Assertion truth relativism assessment sensitivity monadic truth non-monadic truth |
url | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-512X2019000200355&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matiasgariazzo assertionandassessmentsensitivity |