ASSERTION AND ASSESSMENT SENSITIVITY

ABSTRACT Gareth Evans (1985) and Sven Rosenkranz (2008) have respectively formulated two objections to truth relativism that would show that this view does not cohere with our practice of asserting. I argue that the relativist should answer such objections by appealing to the notion of assessment s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Matías Gariazzo
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais 2019-08-01
Series:Kriterion
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-512X2019000200355&tlng=en
_version_ 1818974950970621952
author Matías Gariazzo
author_facet Matías Gariazzo
author_sort Matías Gariazzo
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Gareth Evans (1985) and Sven Rosenkranz (2008) have respectively formulated two objections to truth relativism that would show that this view does not cohere with our practice of asserting. I argue that the relativist should answer such objections by appealing to the notion of assessment sensitivity. Since the relativist accounts for this notion by means of a technical truth predicate relating propositions to contexts of assessment, the task left to her turns out to be to make sense of assessment sensitivity by making sense of this predicate (i.e. by showing that it expresses a truth notion).
first_indexed 2024-12-20T15:48:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c253cd08b12e444b90e17d75b8d25191
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0100-512X
language deu
last_indexed 2024-12-20T15:48:12Z
publishDate 2019-08-01
publisher Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
record_format Article
series Kriterion
spelling doaj.art-c253cd08b12e444b90e17d75b8d251912022-12-21T19:34:49ZdeuUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisKriterion0100-512X2019-08-016014335537610.1590/0100-512x2019n14307mgASSERTION AND ASSESSMENT SENSITIVITYMatías Gariazzohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6346-8386ABSTRACT Gareth Evans (1985) and Sven Rosenkranz (2008) have respectively formulated two objections to truth relativism that would show that this view does not cohere with our practice of asserting. I argue that the relativist should answer such objections by appealing to the notion of assessment sensitivity. Since the relativist accounts for this notion by means of a technical truth predicate relating propositions to contexts of assessment, the task left to her turns out to be to make sense of assessment sensitivity by making sense of this predicate (i.e. by showing that it expresses a truth notion).http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-512X2019000200355&tlng=enAssertiontruth relativismassessment sensitivitymonadic truthnon-monadic truth
spellingShingle Matías Gariazzo
ASSERTION AND ASSESSMENT SENSITIVITY
Kriterion
Assertion
truth relativism
assessment sensitivity
monadic truth
non-monadic truth
title ASSERTION AND ASSESSMENT SENSITIVITY
title_full ASSERTION AND ASSESSMENT SENSITIVITY
title_fullStr ASSERTION AND ASSESSMENT SENSITIVITY
title_full_unstemmed ASSERTION AND ASSESSMENT SENSITIVITY
title_short ASSERTION AND ASSESSMENT SENSITIVITY
title_sort assertion and assessment sensitivity
topic Assertion
truth relativism
assessment sensitivity
monadic truth
non-monadic truth
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-512X2019000200355&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT matiasgariazzo assertionandassessmentsensitivity