Testing the activitystat hypothesis: a randomised controlled trial

Abstract Background It has been hypothesised that an ‘activitystat’ may biologically regulate energy expenditure or physical activity levels, thereby limiting the effectiveness of physical activity interventions. Using a randomised controlled trial design, the aim of this study was to investigate th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. R. Gomersall, C. Maher, C. English, A. V. Rowlands, J. Dollman, K. Norton, T. Olds
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2016-08-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-016-3568-x
_version_ 1818215196576972800
author S. R. Gomersall
C. Maher
C. English
A. V. Rowlands
J. Dollman
K. Norton
T. Olds
author_facet S. R. Gomersall
C. Maher
C. English
A. V. Rowlands
J. Dollman
K. Norton
T. Olds
author_sort S. R. Gomersall
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background It has been hypothesised that an ‘activitystat’ may biologically regulate energy expenditure or physical activity levels, thereby limiting the effectiveness of physical activity interventions. Using a randomised controlled trial design, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a six-week exercise stimulus on energy expenditure and physical activity, in order to empirically test this hypothesis. Methods Previously inactive adults (n = 129) [age (mean ± SD) 41 ± 11 year; body mass index 26.1 ± 5.2 kg/m2] were randomly allocated to a Control group (n = 43) or a 6-week Moderate (150 min/week) (n = 43) or Extensive (300 min/week) (n = 43) exercise intervention group. Energy expenditure and physical activity were measured using a combination of accelerometry (total counts, minutes spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity) and detailed time use recalls using the Multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adults (total daily energy expenditure, minutes spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity) at baseline, mid- and end-intervention and 3- and 6-month follow up. Resting metabolic rate was measured at baseline and end-intervention using indirect calorimetry. Analysis was conducted using random effects mixed modeling. Results At end-intervention, there were statistically significant increases in all energy expenditure and physical activity variables according to both accelerometry and time use recalls (p < 0.001) in the Moderate and Extensive groups, relative to Controls. There was no significant change in resting metabolic rate (p = 0.78). Conclusion Taken together, these results show no evidence of an “activitystat” effect. In the current study, imposed exercise stimuli of 150–300 min/week resulted in commensurate increases in overall energy expenditure and physical activity, with no sign of compensation in either of these constructs. Trial registration number ACTRN12610000248066  (registered prospectively 24 March 2010)
first_indexed 2024-12-12T06:32:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c256306ccb9145148634ee61c785d7dc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2458
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T06:32:14Z
publishDate 2016-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj.art-c256306ccb9145148634ee61c785d7dc2022-12-22T00:34:34ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582016-08-0116111410.1186/s12889-016-3568-xTesting the activitystat hypothesis: a randomised controlled trialS. R. Gomersall0C. Maher1C. English2A. V. Rowlands3J. Dollman4K. Norton5T. Olds6School of Health Sciences, Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South AustraliaSchool of Health Sciences, Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South AustraliaSchool of Health Sciences, Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South AustraliaSchool of Health Sciences, Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South AustraliaSchool of Health Sciences, Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South AustraliaSchool of Health Sciences, Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South AustraliaSchool of Health Sciences, Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South AustraliaAbstract Background It has been hypothesised that an ‘activitystat’ may biologically regulate energy expenditure or physical activity levels, thereby limiting the effectiveness of physical activity interventions. Using a randomised controlled trial design, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a six-week exercise stimulus on energy expenditure and physical activity, in order to empirically test this hypothesis. Methods Previously inactive adults (n = 129) [age (mean ± SD) 41 ± 11 year; body mass index 26.1 ± 5.2 kg/m2] were randomly allocated to a Control group (n = 43) or a 6-week Moderate (150 min/week) (n = 43) or Extensive (300 min/week) (n = 43) exercise intervention group. Energy expenditure and physical activity were measured using a combination of accelerometry (total counts, minutes spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity) and detailed time use recalls using the Multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adults (total daily energy expenditure, minutes spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity) at baseline, mid- and end-intervention and 3- and 6-month follow up. Resting metabolic rate was measured at baseline and end-intervention using indirect calorimetry. Analysis was conducted using random effects mixed modeling. Results At end-intervention, there were statistically significant increases in all energy expenditure and physical activity variables according to both accelerometry and time use recalls (p < 0.001) in the Moderate and Extensive groups, relative to Controls. There was no significant change in resting metabolic rate (p = 0.78). Conclusion Taken together, these results show no evidence of an “activitystat” effect. In the current study, imposed exercise stimuli of 150–300 min/week resulted in commensurate increases in overall energy expenditure and physical activity, with no sign of compensation in either of these constructs. Trial registration number ACTRN12610000248066  (registered prospectively 24 March 2010)http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-016-3568-xPhysical activityEnergy expenditureAccelerometryCompensation
spellingShingle S. R. Gomersall
C. Maher
C. English
A. V. Rowlands
J. Dollman
K. Norton
T. Olds
Testing the activitystat hypothesis: a randomised controlled trial
BMC Public Health
Physical activity
Energy expenditure
Accelerometry
Compensation
title Testing the activitystat hypothesis: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Testing the activitystat hypothesis: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Testing the activitystat hypothesis: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Testing the activitystat hypothesis: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Testing the activitystat hypothesis: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort testing the activitystat hypothesis a randomised controlled trial
topic Physical activity
Energy expenditure
Accelerometry
Compensation
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-016-3568-x
work_keys_str_mv AT srgomersall testingtheactivitystathypothesisarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cmaher testingtheactivitystathypothesisarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cenglish testingtheactivitystathypothesisarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT avrowlands testingtheactivitystathypothesisarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jdollman testingtheactivitystathypothesisarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT knorton testingtheactivitystathypothesisarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tolds testingtheactivitystathypothesisarandomisedcontrolledtrial