The value of adjacent vessel sign in malignant breast tumors

PURPOSEThe aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic quality of adjacent vessel sign (AVS) in malignant breast tumors by comparing it with classical prognostic pathological biomarkers and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings.METHODSA total of 124 patients with 133 malignant lesions were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ezra Çetinkaya, Şeyma Yıldız, Hafize Otçu, Rasul Sharifov, Fatma Çelik Yabul, Alpay Alkan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Publishing House 2022-09-01
Series:Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
Online Access: http://www.dirjournal.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/the-value-of-adjacent-vessel-sign-in-malignant-bre/53621
_version_ 1797691381289844736
author Ezra Çetinkaya
Şeyma Yıldız
Hafize Otçu
Rasul Sharifov
Fatma Çelik Yabul
Alpay Alkan
author_facet Ezra Çetinkaya
Şeyma Yıldız
Hafize Otçu
Rasul Sharifov
Fatma Çelik Yabul
Alpay Alkan
author_sort Ezra Çetinkaya
collection DOAJ
description PURPOSEThe aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic quality of adjacent vessel sign (AVS) in malignant breast tumors by comparing it with classical prognostic pathological biomarkers and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings.METHODSA total of 124 patients with 133 malignant lesions were included. All the imaging was performed on a 1.5T Avanto scanner and the images were interpreted according to BI-RADS-MR® (fifth ed.) atlas. Maximum intensity projection (MIP) images were constructed from subtracted post-contrast images and were used to investigate AVS. Histopathological results and MRI findings were compared with AVS.RESULTSInterobserver agreement about AVS status was substantial (κ=0.64). AVS positive lesions were significantly bigger in size (P < .001, AVS negative: median 12 mm, AVS positive: median 31 mm). AVS was significantly associated with increased Ki-67 index and axillary lymph node metastasis (P=.009 and P=.019, respectively). Between AVS and lymphovascular invasion (LVI), there was a trend toward positive relationship (P=.076). MRI findings of T2 hypointensity, peritumoral edema, irregular shape, non-homogeneous contrast enhancement, rapid early contrast enhancement, and skin infiltration showed significant positive relation with AVS (P < .001, P < .001, P < .001, P=.02, P=.021, and P=.021, respectively). AVS is found to be associated with increased Ki-67 index, axillary lymph node metastasis, and some MRI findings that point to malignancy or poor prognosis.CONCLUSIONAVS indicates poor prognosis since it is related to axillary lymph node metastasis, increased Ki-67 index, LVI, peritumoral edema, rapid early contrast enhancement, increased background enhancement, skin extension, T2 hypointensity, non-homogeneous contrast enhancement, irregular lesion shape, and larger tumor size. AVS is an easy to use sign that shows substantial interobserver agreement.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T02:13:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c25b52986c814d9bb5affeffee6fb95b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1305-3825
1305-3612
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T02:13:28Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Galenos Publishing House
record_format Article
series Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
spelling doaj.art-c25b52986c814d9bb5affeffee6fb95b2023-09-06T12:05:45ZengGalenos Publishing HouseDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology1305-38251305-36122022-09-0128546346910.5152/dir.2022.21122813049054The value of adjacent vessel sign in malignant breast tumorsEzra Çetinkaya0Şeyma Yıldız1Hafize Otçu2Rasul Sharifov3Fatma Çelik Yabul4Alpay Alkan5 Department of Radiology, 25 Aralık State Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey PURPOSEThe aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic quality of adjacent vessel sign (AVS) in malignant breast tumors by comparing it with classical prognostic pathological biomarkers and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings.METHODSA total of 124 patients with 133 malignant lesions were included. All the imaging was performed on a 1.5T Avanto scanner and the images were interpreted according to BI-RADS-MR® (fifth ed.) atlas. Maximum intensity projection (MIP) images were constructed from subtracted post-contrast images and were used to investigate AVS. Histopathological results and MRI findings were compared with AVS.RESULTSInterobserver agreement about AVS status was substantial (κ=0.64). AVS positive lesions were significantly bigger in size (P < .001, AVS negative: median 12 mm, AVS positive: median 31 mm). AVS was significantly associated with increased Ki-67 index and axillary lymph node metastasis (P=.009 and P=.019, respectively). Between AVS and lymphovascular invasion (LVI), there was a trend toward positive relationship (P=.076). MRI findings of T2 hypointensity, peritumoral edema, irregular shape, non-homogeneous contrast enhancement, rapid early contrast enhancement, and skin infiltration showed significant positive relation with AVS (P < .001, P < .001, P < .001, P=.02, P=.021, and P=.021, respectively). AVS is found to be associated with increased Ki-67 index, axillary lymph node metastasis, and some MRI findings that point to malignancy or poor prognosis.CONCLUSIONAVS indicates poor prognosis since it is related to axillary lymph node metastasis, increased Ki-67 index, LVI, peritumoral edema, rapid early contrast enhancement, increased background enhancement, skin extension, T2 hypointensity, non-homogeneous contrast enhancement, irregular lesion shape, and larger tumor size. AVS is an easy to use sign that shows substantial interobserver agreement. http://www.dirjournal.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/the-value-of-adjacent-vessel-sign-in-malignant-bre/53621
spellingShingle Ezra Çetinkaya
Şeyma Yıldız
Hafize Otçu
Rasul Sharifov
Fatma Çelik Yabul
Alpay Alkan
The value of adjacent vessel sign in malignant breast tumors
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
title The value of adjacent vessel sign in malignant breast tumors
title_full The value of adjacent vessel sign in malignant breast tumors
title_fullStr The value of adjacent vessel sign in malignant breast tumors
title_full_unstemmed The value of adjacent vessel sign in malignant breast tumors
title_short The value of adjacent vessel sign in malignant breast tumors
title_sort value of adjacent vessel sign in malignant breast tumors
url http://www.dirjournal.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/the-value-of-adjacent-vessel-sign-in-malignant-bre/53621
work_keys_str_mv AT ezracetinkaya thevalueofadjacentvesselsigninmalignantbreasttumors
AT seymayıldız thevalueofadjacentvesselsigninmalignantbreasttumors
AT hafizeotcu thevalueofadjacentvesselsigninmalignantbreasttumors
AT rasulsharifov thevalueofadjacentvesselsigninmalignantbreasttumors
AT fatmacelikyabul thevalueofadjacentvesselsigninmalignantbreasttumors
AT alpayalkan thevalueofadjacentvesselsigninmalignantbreasttumors
AT ezracetinkaya valueofadjacentvesselsigninmalignantbreasttumors
AT seymayıldız valueofadjacentvesselsigninmalignantbreasttumors
AT hafizeotcu valueofadjacentvesselsigninmalignantbreasttumors
AT rasulsharifov valueofadjacentvesselsigninmalignantbreasttumors
AT fatmacelikyabul valueofadjacentvesselsigninmalignantbreasttumors
AT alpayalkan valueofadjacentvesselsigninmalignantbreasttumors