Efficacy of spinal ropivacaine versus ropivacaine with fentanyl in transurethral resection operations

Background: The low-dose ropivacaine provides differential spinal block to reduce adverse hemodynamic effects in elderly patients. Addition of intrathecal fentanyl with ropivacaine may enhance analgesia and early postoperative mobility. The present study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of int...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A Chaudhary, J Bogra, P K Singh, S Saxena, G Chandra, R Verma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2014-01-01
Series:Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.saudija.org/article.asp?issn=1658-354X;year=2014;volume=8;issue=1;spage=88;epage=91;aulast=Chaudhary
_version_ 1819266692098818048
author A Chaudhary
J Bogra
P K Singh
S Saxena
G Chandra
R Verma
author_facet A Chaudhary
J Bogra
P K Singh
S Saxena
G Chandra
R Verma
author_sort A Chaudhary
collection DOAJ
description Background: The low-dose ropivacaine provides differential spinal block to reduce adverse hemodynamic effects in elderly patients. Addition of intrathecal fentanyl with ropivacaine may enhance analgesia and early postoperative mobility. The present study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of intrathecal ropivacaine alone and in combination with fentanyl in transurethral resection operation. Methods: Sixty male patients aged >50 years of ASA I-III scheduled for elective transurethral resection were included in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study and they were divided in two groups of 30 each. Group A (n = 30) received intrathecal injection of ropivacaine 2 ml (0.75%) and Group B (n = 30) ropivacaine 1.8 ml (0.75%) with fentanyl 10 μg. The characteristics of onset and regression of sensory and motor blockade, hemodynamic stability, and side effects were observed. Student′s t test (for parametric data) and Mann-Whitney U test (for non-parametric data) were used for statistical analyses. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups for patient demographic data, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, side effects, and satisfaction to patients and surgeon. The highest level of sensory block was at T10 in group A and T9 in group B (P = 0.001). Duration of motor block was longer in group B being 210.51 ± 61.25 min than in group A being 286.25 ± 55.65 min (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The addition of fentanyl to ropivacaine may offer the advantage of shorter duration of complete motor block, hemodynamic stability, and without any increase in the frequency of major side effects.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T21:05:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c262b776b1f34e09ad56775403035123
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1658-354X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T21:05:18Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
spelling doaj.art-c262b776b1f34e09ad567754030351232022-12-21T17:31:15ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsSaudi Journal of Anaesthesia1658-354X2014-01-0181889110.4103/1658-354X.125951Efficacy of spinal ropivacaine versus ropivacaine with fentanyl in transurethral resection operationsA ChaudharyJ BograP K SinghS SaxenaG ChandraR VermaBackground: The low-dose ropivacaine provides differential spinal block to reduce adverse hemodynamic effects in elderly patients. Addition of intrathecal fentanyl with ropivacaine may enhance analgesia and early postoperative mobility. The present study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of intrathecal ropivacaine alone and in combination with fentanyl in transurethral resection operation. Methods: Sixty male patients aged >50 years of ASA I-III scheduled for elective transurethral resection were included in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study and they were divided in two groups of 30 each. Group A (n = 30) received intrathecal injection of ropivacaine 2 ml (0.75%) and Group B (n = 30) ropivacaine 1.8 ml (0.75%) with fentanyl 10 μg. The characteristics of onset and regression of sensory and motor blockade, hemodynamic stability, and side effects were observed. Student′s t test (for parametric data) and Mann-Whitney U test (for non-parametric data) were used for statistical analyses. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups for patient demographic data, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, side effects, and satisfaction to patients and surgeon. The highest level of sensory block was at T10 in group A and T9 in group B (P = 0.001). Duration of motor block was longer in group B being 210.51 ± 61.25 min than in group A being 286.25 ± 55.65 min (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The addition of fentanyl to ropivacaine may offer the advantage of shorter duration of complete motor block, hemodynamic stability, and without any increase in the frequency of major side effects.http://www.saudija.org/article.asp?issn=1658-354X;year=2014;volume=8;issue=1;spage=88;epage=91;aulast=ChaudharyAnalgesicsfentanyropivacainespinal anesthesia
spellingShingle A Chaudhary
J Bogra
P K Singh
S Saxena
G Chandra
R Verma
Efficacy of spinal ropivacaine versus ropivacaine with fentanyl in transurethral resection operations
Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
Analgesics
fentany
ropivacaine
spinal anesthesia
title Efficacy of spinal ropivacaine versus ropivacaine with fentanyl in transurethral resection operations
title_full Efficacy of spinal ropivacaine versus ropivacaine with fentanyl in transurethral resection operations
title_fullStr Efficacy of spinal ropivacaine versus ropivacaine with fentanyl in transurethral resection operations
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of spinal ropivacaine versus ropivacaine with fentanyl in transurethral resection operations
title_short Efficacy of spinal ropivacaine versus ropivacaine with fentanyl in transurethral resection operations
title_sort efficacy of spinal ropivacaine versus ropivacaine with fentanyl in transurethral resection operations
topic Analgesics
fentany
ropivacaine
spinal anesthesia
url http://www.saudija.org/article.asp?issn=1658-354X;year=2014;volume=8;issue=1;spage=88;epage=91;aulast=Chaudhary
work_keys_str_mv AT achaudhary efficacyofspinalropivacaineversusropivacainewithfentanylintransurethralresectionoperations
AT jbogra efficacyofspinalropivacaineversusropivacainewithfentanylintransurethralresectionoperations
AT pksingh efficacyofspinalropivacaineversusropivacainewithfentanylintransurethralresectionoperations
AT ssaxena efficacyofspinalropivacaineversusropivacainewithfentanylintransurethralresectionoperations
AT gchandra efficacyofspinalropivacaineversusropivacainewithfentanylintransurethralresectionoperations
AT rverma efficacyofspinalropivacaineversusropivacainewithfentanylintransurethralresectionoperations