Biogeography of photoautotrophs in the high polar biome

The global latitudinal gradient in biodiversity weakens in the high polar biome and so an alternative explanation for distribution of Arctic and Antarctic photoautotrophs is required. Here we identify how temporal, microclimate and evolutionary drivers of biogeography are important, rather than th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephen Brian Pointing, Burkhard eBuedel, Peter eConvey, Len eGillman, Christian eKoerner, Sebastian eLeuzinger, Warwick F. Vincent
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Plant Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpls.2015.00692/full
_version_ 1828187704751292416
author Stephen Brian Pointing
Burkhard eBuedel
Peter eConvey
Len eGillman
Christian eKoerner
Sebastian eLeuzinger
Warwick F. Vincent
author_facet Stephen Brian Pointing
Burkhard eBuedel
Peter eConvey
Len eGillman
Christian eKoerner
Sebastian eLeuzinger
Warwick F. Vincent
author_sort Stephen Brian Pointing
collection DOAJ
description The global latitudinal gradient in biodiversity weakens in the high polar biome and so an alternative explanation for distribution of Arctic and Antarctic photoautotrophs is required. Here we identify how temporal, microclimate and evolutionary drivers of biogeography are important, rather than the macroclimate features that drive plant diversity patterns elsewhere. High polar ecosystems are biologically unique, with a more central role for bryophytes, lichens and microbial photoautotrophs over that of vascular plants. Constraints on vascular plants arise mainly due to stature and ontogenetic barriers. Conversely non-vascular plant and microbial photoautotroph distribution is correlated with favourable microclimates and the capacity for poikilohydric dormancy. Contemporary distribution also depends on evolutionary history, with adaptive and dispersal traits as well as legacy influencing biogeography. We highlight the relevance of these findings to predicting future impacts on polar plant diversity and to the current status of plants in Arctic and Antarctic conservation policy frameworks.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T07:39:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c27c44930f95434daa8a8ecc6352786e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-462X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T07:39:17Z
publishDate 2015-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Plant Science
spelling doaj.art-c27c44930f95434daa8a8ecc6352786e2022-12-22T03:41:52ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Plant Science1664-462X2015-09-01610.3389/fpls.2015.00692153097Biogeography of photoautotrophs in the high polar biomeStephen Brian Pointing0Burkhard eBuedel1Peter eConvey2Len eGillman3Christian eKoerner4Sebastian eLeuzinger5Warwick F. Vincent6Auckland University of TechnologyUniversity of KaiserslautenBritish Antarctic SurveyAuckland University of TechnologyUniversity of BaselAuckland University of TechnologyUniversite LavalThe global latitudinal gradient in biodiversity weakens in the high polar biome and so an alternative explanation for distribution of Arctic and Antarctic photoautotrophs is required. Here we identify how temporal, microclimate and evolutionary drivers of biogeography are important, rather than the macroclimate features that drive plant diversity patterns elsewhere. High polar ecosystems are biologically unique, with a more central role for bryophytes, lichens and microbial photoautotrophs over that of vascular plants. Constraints on vascular plants arise mainly due to stature and ontogenetic barriers. Conversely non-vascular plant and microbial photoautotroph distribution is correlated with favourable microclimates and the capacity for poikilohydric dormancy. Contemporary distribution also depends on evolutionary history, with adaptive and dispersal traits as well as legacy influencing biogeography. We highlight the relevance of these findings to predicting future impacts on polar plant diversity and to the current status of plants in Arctic and Antarctic conservation policy frameworks.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpls.2015.00692/fullCyanobacteriaArcticAntarcticaBryophytescryptogamsplant biogeography
spellingShingle Stephen Brian Pointing
Burkhard eBuedel
Peter eConvey
Len eGillman
Christian eKoerner
Sebastian eLeuzinger
Warwick F. Vincent
Biogeography of photoautotrophs in the high polar biome
Frontiers in Plant Science
Cyanobacteria
Arctic
Antarctica
Bryophytes
cryptogams
plant biogeography
title Biogeography of photoautotrophs in the high polar biome
title_full Biogeography of photoautotrophs in the high polar biome
title_fullStr Biogeography of photoautotrophs in the high polar biome
title_full_unstemmed Biogeography of photoautotrophs in the high polar biome
title_short Biogeography of photoautotrophs in the high polar biome
title_sort biogeography of photoautotrophs in the high polar biome
topic Cyanobacteria
Arctic
Antarctica
Bryophytes
cryptogams
plant biogeography
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpls.2015.00692/full
work_keys_str_mv AT stephenbrianpointing biogeographyofphotoautotrophsinthehighpolarbiome
AT burkhardebuedel biogeographyofphotoautotrophsinthehighpolarbiome
AT petereconvey biogeographyofphotoautotrophsinthehighpolarbiome
AT lenegillman biogeographyofphotoautotrophsinthehighpolarbiome
AT christianekoerner biogeographyofphotoautotrophsinthehighpolarbiome
AT sebastianeleuzinger biogeographyofphotoautotrophsinthehighpolarbiome
AT warwickfvincent biogeographyofphotoautotrophsinthehighpolarbiome