Lesson learned: Retrospective analysis of ‘missed out’ dengue NS1 positives among IgM negative population

Objective: To determine the proportion of dengue non-structural protein 1 (NS1) positives among laboratory confirmed dengue IgM negative patients. Methods: Data for 1 732 samples received from January to October 2017 at the Virus Research and Diagnostic Laboratory (VRDL) for dengue diagnosis were do...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mahadevan Ganesan, Robert Sudha, Murugesan Amudhan, Ganesan Sucila Thangam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.apjtm.org/article.asp?issn=1995-7645;year=2020;volume=13;issue=5;spage=221;epage=226;aulast=Ganesan
_version_ 1818514959786573824
author Mahadevan Ganesan
Robert Sudha
Murugesan Amudhan
Ganesan Sucila Thangam
author_facet Mahadevan Ganesan
Robert Sudha
Murugesan Amudhan
Ganesan Sucila Thangam
author_sort Mahadevan Ganesan
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To determine the proportion of dengue non-structural protein 1 (NS1) positives among laboratory confirmed dengue IgM negative patients. Methods: Data for 1 732 samples received from January to October 2017 at the Virus Research and Diagnostic Laboratory (VRDL) for dengue diagnosis were downloaded from the National Institute of Epidemiology server. Samples that were previously reported as IgM negative for dengue diagnosis were identified and their NS1 status was determined using ELISA. Thus, ’missed out’ NS1 positives were correlated with the duration of illness. Furthermore, an epidemic curve for the study period was constructed. The increase in positivity rate within and between the months was compared by McNemar’s and Pearson’s chi-square test, respectively. Results: The reported IgM-negatives were 813, of which, 22.5% (183) were retrospectively positive for NS1 antigen. The addition of NS1 positives revealed by this study has raised the reported positivity across the months that ranged from 8.1% to 29.6%. By analyzing the dengue positives per month and the epidemic curve, the period between January and September, 2017 was identified as non-epidemic while the epidemic started from the month of October, 2017. Conclusions: Acute dengue infection is widely confirmed by detecting NS1 antigen in serum. Missing out of NS1 positives happen due to shortened window period and such cases act as reservoir for further viral transmission. Hence, this study highly emphasizes performing all three tests for dengue diagnosis that warrants the accurate dengue proportion in India.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T00:22:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c2957a030b4c447ebb6e674d73c9d411
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-4146
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T00:22:47Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-c2957a030b4c447ebb6e674d73c9d4112022-12-22T01:27:40ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAsian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine2352-41462020-01-0113522122610.4103/1995-7645.283518Lesson learned: Retrospective analysis of ‘missed out’ dengue NS1 positives among IgM negative populationMahadevan GanesanRobert SudhaMurugesan AmudhanGanesan Sucila ThangamObjective: To determine the proportion of dengue non-structural protein 1 (NS1) positives among laboratory confirmed dengue IgM negative patients. Methods: Data for 1 732 samples received from January to October 2017 at the Virus Research and Diagnostic Laboratory (VRDL) for dengue diagnosis were downloaded from the National Institute of Epidemiology server. Samples that were previously reported as IgM negative for dengue diagnosis were identified and their NS1 status was determined using ELISA. Thus, ’missed out’ NS1 positives were correlated with the duration of illness. Furthermore, an epidemic curve for the study period was constructed. The increase in positivity rate within and between the months was compared by McNemar’s and Pearson’s chi-square test, respectively. Results: The reported IgM-negatives were 813, of which, 22.5% (183) were retrospectively positive for NS1 antigen. The addition of NS1 positives revealed by this study has raised the reported positivity across the months that ranged from 8.1% to 29.6%. By analyzing the dengue positives per month and the epidemic curve, the period between January and September, 2017 was identified as non-epidemic while the epidemic started from the month of October, 2017. Conclusions: Acute dengue infection is widely confirmed by detecting NS1 antigen in serum. Missing out of NS1 positives happen due to shortened window period and such cases act as reservoir for further viral transmission. Hence, this study highly emphasizes performing all three tests for dengue diagnosis that warrants the accurate dengue proportion in India.http://www.apjtm.org/article.asp?issn=1995-7645;year=2020;volume=13;issue=5;spage=221;epage=226;aulast=Ganesandengue diagnosisns1 elisaigm negative
spellingShingle Mahadevan Ganesan
Robert Sudha
Murugesan Amudhan
Ganesan Sucila Thangam
Lesson learned: Retrospective analysis of ‘missed out’ dengue NS1 positives among IgM negative population
Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine
dengue diagnosis
ns1 elisa
igm negative
title Lesson learned: Retrospective analysis of ‘missed out’ dengue NS1 positives among IgM negative population
title_full Lesson learned: Retrospective analysis of ‘missed out’ dengue NS1 positives among IgM negative population
title_fullStr Lesson learned: Retrospective analysis of ‘missed out’ dengue NS1 positives among IgM negative population
title_full_unstemmed Lesson learned: Retrospective analysis of ‘missed out’ dengue NS1 positives among IgM negative population
title_short Lesson learned: Retrospective analysis of ‘missed out’ dengue NS1 positives among IgM negative population
title_sort lesson learned retrospective analysis of missed out dengue ns1 positives among igm negative population
topic dengue diagnosis
ns1 elisa
igm negative
url http://www.apjtm.org/article.asp?issn=1995-7645;year=2020;volume=13;issue=5;spage=221;epage=226;aulast=Ganesan
work_keys_str_mv AT mahadevanganesan lessonlearnedretrospectiveanalysisofmissedoutdenguens1positivesamongigmnegativepopulation
AT robertsudha lessonlearnedretrospectiveanalysisofmissedoutdenguens1positivesamongigmnegativepopulation
AT murugesanamudhan lessonlearnedretrospectiveanalysisofmissedoutdenguens1positivesamongigmnegativepopulation
AT ganesansucilathangam lessonlearnedretrospectiveanalysisofmissedoutdenguens1positivesamongigmnegativepopulation