The factors affecting implementing shared decision-making in clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey of clinical research coordinators’ perceptions in Japan

Abstract Background The shared decision-making model has been proposed as the ideal treatment decision-making process in medical encounters. However, the decision to participate in clinical trials rarely involves shared decision-making. In this study, we investigated the perceptions of Japanese clin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Miho Fujita, Yuki Yonekura, Kazuhiro Nakayama
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-02-01
Series:BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02138-y
_version_ 1797864519680131072
author Miho Fujita
Yuki Yonekura
Kazuhiro Nakayama
author_facet Miho Fujita
Yuki Yonekura
Kazuhiro Nakayama
author_sort Miho Fujita
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The shared decision-making model has been proposed as the ideal treatment decision-making process in medical encounters. However, the decision to participate in clinical trials rarely involves shared decision-making. In this study, we investigated the perceptions of Japanese clinical research coordinators who routinely support the informed consent process. Methods This study aimed to (1) identify clinical research coordinators’ perceptions of the current status of shared decision-making implementation and its influencing factors, and (2) obtain suggestions to enhance the shared decision-making process in clinical trials. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a web questionnaire based on the Theory of Planned behaviour. Invitations were sent to 1087 Japanese medical institutions, and responses from the participants were captured via the web. The shared decision-making process in clinical trials was defined according to the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire for Doctors. The effect of the attitudes toward shared decision-making, clinical research coordinators’ subjective norms towards its implementation, perceived barriers to autonomous decision-making, and the number of difficult steps in the shared decision-making process on the shared decision-making current status as the shared decision-making intention was assessed by multiple regression analysis. Results In total, 373 clinical research coordinators responded to the questionnaire. Many believed that they were already implementing shared decision-making. Attitudes toward shared decision-making (t = 3.400, p < .001), clinical research coordinators’ subjective norms towards its implementation (t = 2.239, p = .026), perceived barriers to autonomous decision-making (t = 3.957, p < .001), and the number of difficult steps in the shared decision-making process (t = 3.317, p = .001) were found to significantly influence current status (Adjusted R 2 = .123). However, results on perceived barriers to autonomous decision-making and the number of difficult steps in the shared decision-making process indicate a lack of knowledge of shared decision-making and decision-support skills among clinical research coordinators. Conclusions Clinical research coordinators might positively perceive shared decision-making based on normative beliefs without sufficient knowledge of it. Therefore, providing appropriate training on shared decision-making to clinical research coordinators and increasing awareness among stakeholders could enable its improvement. Trial registration Not applicable.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T22:53:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c2977a10cdfe4e10a1e05b168ffc973f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6947
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T22:53:13Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
spelling doaj.art-c2977a10cdfe4e10a1e05b168ffc973f2023-03-22T11:31:38ZengBMCBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making1472-69472023-02-0123111110.1186/s12911-023-02138-yThe factors affecting implementing shared decision-making in clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey of clinical research coordinators’ perceptions in JapanMiho Fujita0Yuki Yonekura1Kazuhiro Nakayama2Clinical Research Support Office, Showa University Northern Yokohama HospitalGraduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke’s International UniversityGraduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke’s International UniversityAbstract Background The shared decision-making model has been proposed as the ideal treatment decision-making process in medical encounters. However, the decision to participate in clinical trials rarely involves shared decision-making. In this study, we investigated the perceptions of Japanese clinical research coordinators who routinely support the informed consent process. Methods This study aimed to (1) identify clinical research coordinators’ perceptions of the current status of shared decision-making implementation and its influencing factors, and (2) obtain suggestions to enhance the shared decision-making process in clinical trials. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a web questionnaire based on the Theory of Planned behaviour. Invitations were sent to 1087 Japanese medical institutions, and responses from the participants were captured via the web. The shared decision-making process in clinical trials was defined according to the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire for Doctors. The effect of the attitudes toward shared decision-making, clinical research coordinators’ subjective norms towards its implementation, perceived barriers to autonomous decision-making, and the number of difficult steps in the shared decision-making process on the shared decision-making current status as the shared decision-making intention was assessed by multiple regression analysis. Results In total, 373 clinical research coordinators responded to the questionnaire. Many believed that they were already implementing shared decision-making. Attitudes toward shared decision-making (t = 3.400, p < .001), clinical research coordinators’ subjective norms towards its implementation (t = 2.239, p = .026), perceived barriers to autonomous decision-making (t = 3.957, p < .001), and the number of difficult steps in the shared decision-making process (t = 3.317, p = .001) were found to significantly influence current status (Adjusted R 2 = .123). However, results on perceived barriers to autonomous decision-making and the number of difficult steps in the shared decision-making process indicate a lack of knowledge of shared decision-making and decision-support skills among clinical research coordinators. Conclusions Clinical research coordinators might positively perceive shared decision-making based on normative beliefs without sufficient knowledge of it. Therefore, providing appropriate training on shared decision-making to clinical research coordinators and increasing awareness among stakeholders could enable its improvement. Trial registration Not applicable.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02138-yShared decision-makingImplementationClinical trialClinical research coordinators’ perceptionThe Theory of Planned behaviourSDM-Q-Doc
spellingShingle Miho Fujita
Yuki Yonekura
Kazuhiro Nakayama
The factors affecting implementing shared decision-making in clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey of clinical research coordinators’ perceptions in Japan
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Shared decision-making
Implementation
Clinical trial
Clinical research coordinators’ perception
The Theory of Planned behaviour
SDM-Q-Doc
title The factors affecting implementing shared decision-making in clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey of clinical research coordinators’ perceptions in Japan
title_full The factors affecting implementing shared decision-making in clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey of clinical research coordinators’ perceptions in Japan
title_fullStr The factors affecting implementing shared decision-making in clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey of clinical research coordinators’ perceptions in Japan
title_full_unstemmed The factors affecting implementing shared decision-making in clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey of clinical research coordinators’ perceptions in Japan
title_short The factors affecting implementing shared decision-making in clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey of clinical research coordinators’ perceptions in Japan
title_sort factors affecting implementing shared decision making in clinical trials a cross sectional survey of clinical research coordinators perceptions in japan
topic Shared decision-making
Implementation
Clinical trial
Clinical research coordinators’ perception
The Theory of Planned behaviour
SDM-Q-Doc
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02138-y
work_keys_str_mv AT mihofujita thefactorsaffectingimplementingshareddecisionmakinginclinicaltrialsacrosssectionalsurveyofclinicalresearchcoordinatorsperceptionsinjapan
AT yukiyonekura thefactorsaffectingimplementingshareddecisionmakinginclinicaltrialsacrosssectionalsurveyofclinicalresearchcoordinatorsperceptionsinjapan
AT kazuhironakayama thefactorsaffectingimplementingshareddecisionmakinginclinicaltrialsacrosssectionalsurveyofclinicalresearchcoordinatorsperceptionsinjapan
AT mihofujita factorsaffectingimplementingshareddecisionmakinginclinicaltrialsacrosssectionalsurveyofclinicalresearchcoordinatorsperceptionsinjapan
AT yukiyonekura factorsaffectingimplementingshareddecisionmakinginclinicaltrialsacrosssectionalsurveyofclinicalresearchcoordinatorsperceptionsinjapan
AT kazuhironakayama factorsaffectingimplementingshareddecisionmakinginclinicaltrialsacrosssectionalsurveyofclinicalresearchcoordinatorsperceptionsinjapan