Comparison of the accuracy of Glasgow Coma Scale and Full Outline of Unresponsiveness Score in predicting the prognosis of patients with cerebrovascular accidents admitted to intensive care unit

BACKGROUND: Vascular-cerebral dysfunction is a sudden decline in brain function as a result of impaired blood supply to the brain. Critical care professionals in intensive care units (ICUs) need highly reliable prognostic scales to determine the degree of neurological dysfunction. The purpose of thi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shilan Ghaderi, Aram Karimian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vesnu Publications 2021-02-01
Series:Chronic Diseases Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://cdjournal.muk.ac.ir/index.php/cdj/article/view/597
_version_ 1797894824488075264
author Shilan Ghaderi
Aram Karimian
author_facet Shilan Ghaderi
Aram Karimian
author_sort Shilan Ghaderi
collection DOAJ
description BACKGROUND: Vascular-cerebral dysfunction is a sudden decline in brain function as a result of impaired blood supply to the brain. Critical care professionals in intensive care units (ICUs) need highly reliable prognostic scales to determine the degree of neurological dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to compare the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) Score and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) in predicting the prognosis of patients with cerebrovascular events. METHODS: This study was performed on forty patients with cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Researchers used the FOUR Score and GCS for mortality prediction for each patient. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. Mann-Whitney test was used for comparison of means. Data were analyzed using Stata software. RESULTS: In this study, according to FOUR Score, 62.5% of all patients survived and 37.5% died. Mean mortality and survival rates for GCS criterion were 5.37 ± 2.37 and 9.12 ± 2.12, respectively, and for FOUR Score criterion were 5.60 ± 0.81 and 10.64 ± 2.23, respectively. CONCLUSION: The FOUR Score has higher sensitivity, specificity, and predictive power than GCS in patients with CVA. Therefore, it is recommended to use this scale in ICUs.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T07:16:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c299291cab9d49d696ba4c9d937a5325
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2588-7297
2345-2226
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T07:16:36Z
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher Vesnu Publications
record_format Article
series Chronic Diseases Journal
spelling doaj.art-c299291cab9d49d696ba4c9d937a53252023-02-25T09:43:54ZengVesnu PublicationsChronic Diseases Journal2588-72972345-22262021-02-01913641https://doi.org/10.22122/cdj.v9i1.597Comparison of the accuracy of Glasgow Coma Scale and Full Outline of Unresponsiveness Score in predicting the prognosis of patients with cerebrovascular accidents admitted to intensive care unitShilan Ghaderi0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4339-6095Aram Karimian1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8705-325XDepartment of Emergency Medical Sciences, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, IranAram KarimianBACKGROUND: Vascular-cerebral dysfunction is a sudden decline in brain function as a result of impaired blood supply to the brain. Critical care professionals in intensive care units (ICUs) need highly reliable prognostic scales to determine the degree of neurological dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to compare the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) Score and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) in predicting the prognosis of patients with cerebrovascular events. METHODS: This study was performed on forty patients with cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Researchers used the FOUR Score and GCS for mortality prediction for each patient. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. Mann-Whitney test was used for comparison of means. Data were analyzed using Stata software. RESULTS: In this study, according to FOUR Score, 62.5% of all patients survived and 37.5% died. Mean mortality and survival rates for GCS criterion were 5.37 ± 2.37 and 9.12 ± 2.12, respectively, and for FOUR Score criterion were 5.60 ± 0.81 and 10.64 ± 2.23, respectively. CONCLUSION: The FOUR Score has higher sensitivity, specificity, and predictive power than GCS in patients with CVA. Therefore, it is recommended to use this scale in ICUs.http://cdjournal.muk.ac.ir/index.php/cdj/article/view/597glasgow coma scaleintensive care unitscerebrovascular accident
spellingShingle Shilan Ghaderi
Aram Karimian
Comparison of the accuracy of Glasgow Coma Scale and Full Outline of Unresponsiveness Score in predicting the prognosis of patients with cerebrovascular accidents admitted to intensive care unit
Chronic Diseases Journal
glasgow coma scale
intensive care units
cerebrovascular accident
title Comparison of the accuracy of Glasgow Coma Scale and Full Outline of Unresponsiveness Score in predicting the prognosis of patients with cerebrovascular accidents admitted to intensive care unit
title_full Comparison of the accuracy of Glasgow Coma Scale and Full Outline of Unresponsiveness Score in predicting the prognosis of patients with cerebrovascular accidents admitted to intensive care unit
title_fullStr Comparison of the accuracy of Glasgow Coma Scale and Full Outline of Unresponsiveness Score in predicting the prognosis of patients with cerebrovascular accidents admitted to intensive care unit
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the accuracy of Glasgow Coma Scale and Full Outline of Unresponsiveness Score in predicting the prognosis of patients with cerebrovascular accidents admitted to intensive care unit
title_short Comparison of the accuracy of Glasgow Coma Scale and Full Outline of Unresponsiveness Score in predicting the prognosis of patients with cerebrovascular accidents admitted to intensive care unit
title_sort comparison of the accuracy of glasgow coma scale and full outline of unresponsiveness score in predicting the prognosis of patients with cerebrovascular accidents admitted to intensive care unit
topic glasgow coma scale
intensive care units
cerebrovascular accident
url http://cdjournal.muk.ac.ir/index.php/cdj/article/view/597
work_keys_str_mv AT shilanghaderi comparisonoftheaccuracyofglasgowcomascaleandfulloutlineofunresponsivenessscoreinpredictingtheprognosisofpatientswithcerebrovascularaccidentsadmittedtointensivecareunit
AT aramkarimian comparisonoftheaccuracyofglasgowcomascaleandfulloutlineofunresponsivenessscoreinpredictingtheprognosisofpatientswithcerebrovascularaccidentsadmittedtointensivecareunit