Added-value from a multi-criteria selection of donor catchments in the prediction of continuous streamflow series at ungauged pollution control-sites

We explore the potential of a multi-criteria selection of donor catchments in the prediction of continuous streamflow series by the spatial proximity method. Three criteria have been used: (1) spatial proximity; (2) physical similarity; (3) stream gauging network topology. An extensive assessmen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G. Drogue, W. B. Khediri, C. Conan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2016-05-01
Series:Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences
Online Access:https://www.proc-iahs.net/373/69/2016/piahs-373-69-2016.pdf
_version_ 1811200194648211456
author G. Drogue
W. B. Khediri
C. Conan
author_facet G. Drogue
W. B. Khediri
C. Conan
author_sort G. Drogue
collection DOAJ
description We explore the potential of a multi-criteria selection of donor catchments in the prediction of continuous streamflow series by the spatial proximity method. Three criteria have been used: (1) spatial proximity; (2) physical similarity; (3) stream gauging network topology. An extensive assessment of our spatial proximity method variant is made on a 149 catchment-data set located in the Rhine-Meuse catchment. The competitiveness of the method is evaluated against spatial interpolation of catchment model parameters with ordinary kriging. We found that the spatial proximity approach is more efficient than ordinary kriging. When distance to upstream/downstream stream gauge stations is considered as a second order criterion in the selection of donor catchments, an unprecedented level of efficiency is reached for nested catchments. Nevertheless, the spatial proximity method does not take advantage from physical similarity between donor catchments and receiver catchments because catchments that are the most hydrologically similar to each catchment poorly match with the catchments that are the most physically similar to each catchment.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T02:00:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c2bed5b8e5644d8989609b58e795696c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2199-8981
2199-899X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T02:00:40Z
publishDate 2016-05-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences
spelling doaj.art-c2bed5b8e5644d8989609b58e795696c2022-12-22T03:52:41ZengCopernicus PublicationsProceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences2199-89812199-899X2016-05-01373697210.5194/piahs-373-69-2016Added-value from a multi-criteria selection of donor catchments in the prediction of continuous streamflow series at ungauged pollution control-sitesG. Drogue0W. B. Khediri1C. Conan2Laboratoire LOTERR, Université de Lorraine, Metz, 57045 CEDEX 1, FranceLaboratoire LOTERR, Université de Lorraine, Metz, 57045 CEDEX 1, FranceAgence de l'Eau Rhin-Meuse, Moulins Lès Metz, 57161 BP 30019, FranceWe explore the potential of a multi-criteria selection of donor catchments in the prediction of continuous streamflow series by the spatial proximity method. Three criteria have been used: (1) spatial proximity; (2) physical similarity; (3) stream gauging network topology. An extensive assessment of our spatial proximity method variant is made on a 149 catchment-data set located in the Rhine-Meuse catchment. The competitiveness of the method is evaluated against spatial interpolation of catchment model parameters with ordinary kriging. We found that the spatial proximity approach is more efficient than ordinary kriging. When distance to upstream/downstream stream gauge stations is considered as a second order criterion in the selection of donor catchments, an unprecedented level of efficiency is reached for nested catchments. Nevertheless, the spatial proximity method does not take advantage from physical similarity between donor catchments and receiver catchments because catchments that are the most hydrologically similar to each catchment poorly match with the catchments that are the most physically similar to each catchment.https://www.proc-iahs.net/373/69/2016/piahs-373-69-2016.pdf
spellingShingle G. Drogue
W. B. Khediri
C. Conan
Added-value from a multi-criteria selection of donor catchments in the prediction of continuous streamflow series at ungauged pollution control-sites
Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences
title Added-value from a multi-criteria selection of donor catchments in the prediction of continuous streamflow series at ungauged pollution control-sites
title_full Added-value from a multi-criteria selection of donor catchments in the prediction of continuous streamflow series at ungauged pollution control-sites
title_fullStr Added-value from a multi-criteria selection of donor catchments in the prediction of continuous streamflow series at ungauged pollution control-sites
title_full_unstemmed Added-value from a multi-criteria selection of donor catchments in the prediction of continuous streamflow series at ungauged pollution control-sites
title_short Added-value from a multi-criteria selection of donor catchments in the prediction of continuous streamflow series at ungauged pollution control-sites
title_sort added value from a multi criteria selection of donor catchments in the prediction of continuous streamflow series at ungauged pollution control sites
url https://www.proc-iahs.net/373/69/2016/piahs-373-69-2016.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT gdrogue addedvaluefromamulticriteriaselectionofdonorcatchmentsinthepredictionofcontinuousstreamflowseriesatungaugedpollutioncontrolsites
AT wbkhediri addedvaluefromamulticriteriaselectionofdonorcatchmentsinthepredictionofcontinuousstreamflowseriesatungaugedpollutioncontrolsites
AT cconan addedvaluefromamulticriteriaselectionofdonorcatchmentsinthepredictionofcontinuousstreamflowseriesatungaugedpollutioncontrolsites