A validation study of the Occupational Depression Inventory in Poland and Ukraine

Abstract This study examined the psychometric and structural properties of the Polish and Ukrainian versions of the Occupational Depression Inventory (ODI). We relied on two samples of Polish employees (N Sample1 = 526, 47% female; N Sample2 = 164, 64% female) and one sample of Ukrainian employees (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Krystyna Golonka, Karine O. Malysheva, Dominika Fortuna, Bożena Gulla, Serhii Lytvyn, Leon T. De Beer, Irvin Sam Schonfeld, Renzo Bianchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2024-02-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54995-w
_version_ 1797274826721722368
author Krystyna Golonka
Karine O. Malysheva
Dominika Fortuna
Bożena Gulla
Serhii Lytvyn
Leon T. De Beer
Irvin Sam Schonfeld
Renzo Bianchi
author_facet Krystyna Golonka
Karine O. Malysheva
Dominika Fortuna
Bożena Gulla
Serhii Lytvyn
Leon T. De Beer
Irvin Sam Schonfeld
Renzo Bianchi
author_sort Krystyna Golonka
collection DOAJ
description Abstract This study examined the psychometric and structural properties of the Polish and Ukrainian versions of the Occupational Depression Inventory (ODI). We relied on two samples of Polish employees (N Sample1 = 526, 47% female; N Sample2 = 164, 64% female) and one sample of Ukrainian employees (N Sample3 = 372, 73% female). In all samples, the ODI exhibited essential unidimensionality and high total-score reliability (e.g., McDonald’s omegas > 0.90). The homogeneity of the scale was strong (e.g., 0.59 ≤ scale-level Hs ≤ 0.68). The ODI’s total scores thus accurately ranked individuals on a latent occupational depression continuum. We found evidence of complete measurement invariance across our samples, a prerequisite for between-group comparisons involving observed scores. Looking into the criterion validity of the ODI, we found occupational depression to correlate, in the expected direction, with resilience and job-person fit in six areas of working life—workload, control, rewards, community, fairness, and values. The prevalence of occupational depression was estimated at 5% in Sample 1, 18% in Sample 2, and 3% in Sample 3. Our findings support the use of the ODI’s Polish and Ukrainian versions. This study adds to a growing corpus of research suggesting that the ODI is a robust instrument.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T15:03:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c2c7a5c9d468450795f6cff620168c9b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T15:03:39Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-c2c7a5c9d468450795f6cff620168c9b2024-03-05T19:00:26ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222024-02-011411910.1038/s41598-024-54995-wA validation study of the Occupational Depression Inventory in Poland and UkraineKrystyna Golonka0Karine O. Malysheva1Dominika Fortuna2Bożena Gulla3Serhii Lytvyn4Leon T. De Beer5Irvin Sam Schonfeld6Renzo Bianchi7Institute of Applied Psychology, Jagiellonian UniversityFaculty of Psychology, Taras Shevchenko National University of KyivDoctoral School of Social Sciences, Jagiellonian UniversityInstitute of Applied Psychology, Jagiellonian UniversityFaculty of Psychology, Taras Shevchenko National University of KyivDepartment of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)Department of Psychology, The City College of the City University of New YorkDepartment of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)Abstract This study examined the psychometric and structural properties of the Polish and Ukrainian versions of the Occupational Depression Inventory (ODI). We relied on two samples of Polish employees (N Sample1 = 526, 47% female; N Sample2 = 164, 64% female) and one sample of Ukrainian employees (N Sample3 = 372, 73% female). In all samples, the ODI exhibited essential unidimensionality and high total-score reliability (e.g., McDonald’s omegas > 0.90). The homogeneity of the scale was strong (e.g., 0.59 ≤ scale-level Hs ≤ 0.68). The ODI’s total scores thus accurately ranked individuals on a latent occupational depression continuum. We found evidence of complete measurement invariance across our samples, a prerequisite for between-group comparisons involving observed scores. Looking into the criterion validity of the ODI, we found occupational depression to correlate, in the expected direction, with resilience and job-person fit in six areas of working life—workload, control, rewards, community, fairness, and values. The prevalence of occupational depression was estimated at 5% in Sample 1, 18% in Sample 2, and 3% in Sample 3. Our findings support the use of the ODI’s Polish and Ukrainian versions. This study adds to a growing corpus of research suggesting that the ODI is a robust instrument.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54995-wJob-related distressFactor analysisMokken scale analysisOccupational healthBurnoutPsychometrics
spellingShingle Krystyna Golonka
Karine O. Malysheva
Dominika Fortuna
Bożena Gulla
Serhii Lytvyn
Leon T. De Beer
Irvin Sam Schonfeld
Renzo Bianchi
A validation study of the Occupational Depression Inventory in Poland and Ukraine
Scientific Reports
Job-related distress
Factor analysis
Mokken scale analysis
Occupational health
Burnout
Psychometrics
title A validation study of the Occupational Depression Inventory in Poland and Ukraine
title_full A validation study of the Occupational Depression Inventory in Poland and Ukraine
title_fullStr A validation study of the Occupational Depression Inventory in Poland and Ukraine
title_full_unstemmed A validation study of the Occupational Depression Inventory in Poland and Ukraine
title_short A validation study of the Occupational Depression Inventory in Poland and Ukraine
title_sort validation study of the occupational depression inventory in poland and ukraine
topic Job-related distress
Factor analysis
Mokken scale analysis
Occupational health
Burnout
Psychometrics
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54995-w
work_keys_str_mv AT krystynagolonka avalidationstudyoftheoccupationaldepressioninventoryinpolandandukraine
AT karineomalysheva avalidationstudyoftheoccupationaldepressioninventoryinpolandandukraine
AT dominikafortuna avalidationstudyoftheoccupationaldepressioninventoryinpolandandukraine
AT bozenagulla avalidationstudyoftheoccupationaldepressioninventoryinpolandandukraine
AT serhiilytvyn avalidationstudyoftheoccupationaldepressioninventoryinpolandandukraine
AT leontdebeer avalidationstudyoftheoccupationaldepressioninventoryinpolandandukraine
AT irvinsamschonfeld avalidationstudyoftheoccupationaldepressioninventoryinpolandandukraine
AT renzobianchi avalidationstudyoftheoccupationaldepressioninventoryinpolandandukraine
AT krystynagolonka validationstudyoftheoccupationaldepressioninventoryinpolandandukraine
AT karineomalysheva validationstudyoftheoccupationaldepressioninventoryinpolandandukraine
AT dominikafortuna validationstudyoftheoccupationaldepressioninventoryinpolandandukraine
AT bozenagulla validationstudyoftheoccupationaldepressioninventoryinpolandandukraine
AT serhiilytvyn validationstudyoftheoccupationaldepressioninventoryinpolandandukraine
AT leontdebeer validationstudyoftheoccupationaldepressioninventoryinpolandandukraine
AT irvinsamschonfeld validationstudyoftheoccupationaldepressioninventoryinpolandandukraine
AT renzobianchi validationstudyoftheoccupationaldepressioninventoryinpolandandukraine