Use of Azacitidine or Decitabine for the Up-Front Setting in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Irruption of decitabine and azacitidine has led to profound changes in the upfront management of older acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). However, they have not been directly compared in a randomised clinical trial. In addition, there are no studies comparing the optimal treatment schedule of each drug...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Miriam Saiz-Rodríguez, Jorge Labrador, Beatriz Cuevas, David Martínez-Cuadrón, Verónica Campuzano, Raquel Alcaraz, Isabel Cano, Miguel A. Sanz, Pau Montesinos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-11-01
Series:Cancers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/13/22/5677
_version_ 1797510962989760512
author Miriam Saiz-Rodríguez
Jorge Labrador
Beatriz Cuevas
David Martínez-Cuadrón
Verónica Campuzano
Raquel Alcaraz
Isabel Cano
Miguel A. Sanz
Pau Montesinos
author_facet Miriam Saiz-Rodríguez
Jorge Labrador
Beatriz Cuevas
David Martínez-Cuadrón
Verónica Campuzano
Raquel Alcaraz
Isabel Cano
Miguel A. Sanz
Pau Montesinos
author_sort Miriam Saiz-Rodríguez
collection DOAJ
description Irruption of decitabine and azacitidine has led to profound changes in the upfront management of older acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). However, they have not been directly compared in a randomised clinical trial. In addition, there are no studies comparing the optimal treatment schedule of each drug in AML. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of decitabine and azacitidine monotherapy in newly diagnosed AML was conducted. Randomised controlled trials and retrospective studies were included. A total of 2743 patients from 23 cohorts were analysed (10 cohorts of azacitidine and 13 of decitabine). Similar response rates were observed for azacitidine (38%, 95% CI: 30–47%) compared to decitabine (40%, 95% CI: 32–48%) (<i>p</i> = 0.825). Overall survival (OS) between azacitidine (10.04 months, 95% CI: 8.36–11.72) and decitabine (8.79 months, 95% CI: 7.62–9.96) was also similar (<i>p</i> = 0.386). Patients treated with azacitidine showed a lower median OS when azacitidine was administered for 5 days (6.28 months, 95% CI: 4.23–8.32) compared to the standard 7-day schedule (10.83 months, 95% CI: 9.07–12.59, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Among patients treated with decitabine, response rates and OS were not significantly different between 5-day and 10-day decitabine regimens. Despite heterogeneity between studies, we found no differences in response rates and OS in AML patients treated with azacitidine or decitabine.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T05:38:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c2d01b7cf4a649cfac3c23bf43700bdb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-6694
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T05:38:41Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Cancers
spelling doaj.art-c2d01b7cf4a649cfac3c23bf43700bdb2023-11-22T22:41:41ZengMDPI AGCancers2072-66942021-11-011322567710.3390/cancers13225677Use of Azacitidine or Decitabine for the Up-Front Setting in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisMiriam Saiz-Rodríguez0Jorge Labrador1Beatriz Cuevas2David Martínez-Cuadrón3Verónica Campuzano4Raquel Alcaraz5Isabel Cano6Miguel A. Sanz7Pau Montesinos8Research Unit, Fundación Burgos por la Investigación de la Salud (FBIS), Hospital Universitario de Burgos, 09006 Burgos, SpainResearch Unit, Fundación Burgos por la Investigación de la Salud (FBIS), Hospital Universitario de Burgos, 09006 Burgos, SpainHematology Department, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, 09006 Burgos, SpainHematology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, 46026 Valencia, SpainHematology Department, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, 09006 Burgos, SpainResearch Unit, Fundación Burgos por la Investigación de la Salud (FBIS), Hospital Universitario de Burgos, 09006 Burgos, SpainHematology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, 46026 Valencia, SpainHematology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, 46026 Valencia, SpainHematology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, 46026 Valencia, SpainIrruption of decitabine and azacitidine has led to profound changes in the upfront management of older acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). However, they have not been directly compared in a randomised clinical trial. In addition, there are no studies comparing the optimal treatment schedule of each drug in AML. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of decitabine and azacitidine monotherapy in newly diagnosed AML was conducted. Randomised controlled trials and retrospective studies were included. A total of 2743 patients from 23 cohorts were analysed (10 cohorts of azacitidine and 13 of decitabine). Similar response rates were observed for azacitidine (38%, 95% CI: 30–47%) compared to decitabine (40%, 95% CI: 32–48%) (<i>p</i> = 0.825). Overall survival (OS) between azacitidine (10.04 months, 95% CI: 8.36–11.72) and decitabine (8.79 months, 95% CI: 7.62–9.96) was also similar (<i>p</i> = 0.386). Patients treated with azacitidine showed a lower median OS when azacitidine was administered for 5 days (6.28 months, 95% CI: 4.23–8.32) compared to the standard 7-day schedule (10.83 months, 95% CI: 9.07–12.59, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Among patients treated with decitabine, response rates and OS were not significantly different between 5-day and 10-day decitabine regimens. Despite heterogeneity between studies, we found no differences in response rates and OS in AML patients treated with azacitidine or decitabine.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/13/22/5677azacitidinedecitabinemeta-analysisacute myeloid leukaemiaelderly
spellingShingle Miriam Saiz-Rodríguez
Jorge Labrador
Beatriz Cuevas
David Martínez-Cuadrón
Verónica Campuzano
Raquel Alcaraz
Isabel Cano
Miguel A. Sanz
Pau Montesinos
Use of Azacitidine or Decitabine for the Up-Front Setting in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Cancers
azacitidine
decitabine
meta-analysis
acute myeloid leukaemia
elderly
title Use of Azacitidine or Decitabine for the Up-Front Setting in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Use of Azacitidine or Decitabine for the Up-Front Setting in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Use of Azacitidine or Decitabine for the Up-Front Setting in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Use of Azacitidine or Decitabine for the Up-Front Setting in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Use of Azacitidine or Decitabine for the Up-Front Setting in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort use of azacitidine or decitabine for the up front setting in acute myeloid leukaemia a systematic review and meta analysis
topic azacitidine
decitabine
meta-analysis
acute myeloid leukaemia
elderly
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/13/22/5677
work_keys_str_mv AT miriamsaizrodriguez useofazacitidineordecitabinefortheupfrontsettinginacutemyeloidleukaemiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jorgelabrador useofazacitidineordecitabinefortheupfrontsettinginacutemyeloidleukaemiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT beatrizcuevas useofazacitidineordecitabinefortheupfrontsettinginacutemyeloidleukaemiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT davidmartinezcuadron useofazacitidineordecitabinefortheupfrontsettinginacutemyeloidleukaemiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT veronicacampuzano useofazacitidineordecitabinefortheupfrontsettinginacutemyeloidleukaemiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT raquelalcaraz useofazacitidineordecitabinefortheupfrontsettinginacutemyeloidleukaemiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT isabelcano useofazacitidineordecitabinefortheupfrontsettinginacutemyeloidleukaemiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT miguelasanz useofazacitidineordecitabinefortheupfrontsettinginacutemyeloidleukaemiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT paumontesinos useofazacitidineordecitabinefortheupfrontsettinginacutemyeloidleukaemiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis