Some parameters of nutritional quality of meat obtained from Mangalitsa and Landrace pig breeds

The aim of this study was to provide a comparative analysis of chemical and fatty acid composition, as well as of the connective tissue proteins in pigs of different genotypes, Mangalitsa and Landrace. Both pig genotypes were fed with the same feed of standard composition and quality. At the end of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Šević Radoslav J., Lukač Dragomir R., Vidivić Vitomir S., Puvača Nikola M., Savić Božidar M., Ljubojević Dragana B., Tomović Vladimir M., Džinić Natalija R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association of Chemical Engineers of Serbia 2017-01-01
Series:Hemijska Industrija
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0367-598X/2017/0367-598X1400071S.pdf
_version_ 1828230299414167552
author Šević Radoslav J.
Lukač Dragomir R.
Vidivić Vitomir S.
Puvača Nikola M.
Savić Božidar M.
Ljubojević Dragana B.
Tomović Vladimir M.
Džinić Natalija R.
author_facet Šević Radoslav J.
Lukač Dragomir R.
Vidivić Vitomir S.
Puvača Nikola M.
Savić Božidar M.
Ljubojević Dragana B.
Tomović Vladimir M.
Džinić Natalija R.
author_sort Šević Radoslav J.
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this study was to provide a comparative analysis of chemical and fatty acid composition, as well as of the connective tissue proteins in pigs of different genotypes, Mangalitsa and Landrace. Both pig genotypes were fed with the same feed of standard composition and quality. At the end of the fattening period, in total 24 pigs of both genotypes were slaughtered. Based on the analysis of the chemical composition we came to the conclusion that the protein content in both genotypes was similar. Moisture and ash content in the Landrace pig genotype differed significantly (P < 0.01) compared with genotype of Mangalitsa breed. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.01) were established in the fat content, which was 7.95 g/100 g, in pigs of Mangalitsa breed and 1.59 g/100 g in the Landrace pigs breed. Content of hydroxyproline, non-proteinogenic amino acids, in meat of Landrace was significantly higher (P < 0.01) compared to the content in the Mangalitsa breed. The same tendency was observed with regard to the connective tissue protein content, as well as with the relative connective tissue protein content. The fatty acid composition of the meat indicated that the most common saturated fatty acid (SFA) in both tested breeds was palmitic fatty acid (C16), whose content was significantly higher in Landrace (P < 0.01) compared with its content in Mangalitsa breed. In addition, the share of stearic acid (C18) was significantly higher (P < 0.01) in Landrace compared to Mangalitsa pig breed, what significantly contributed to the increase of the SFA share in Landrace compared to Mangalitsa breed. The most common monounsaturated fatty acid in both pig breeds was the oleic fatty acid (C18:1), whose share was significantly higher in Mangalitsa compared to the Landrace breed (P < 0.01). Out of the polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), linoleic fatty acid (C18:2) was the most predominant in both pig breeds, with no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05). The content of PUFA was not statistically significantly different between the tested breeds, as well as the content of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids, which caused no statistically significant differences in the n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio. Ratio of the unsaturated fatty acids, i.e., of the sum of MUFA and PUFA, and of the saturated fatty acids was significantly higher in Mangalitsa compared to Landrace breed (1.86 vs. 1.4), and the same was observed when it comes to the relationship MUFA/SFA (1.51 in Mangalitsa vs. 1.08 in Landrace breed) and MUFA/PUFA (4.35 vs. 3.38).
first_indexed 2024-04-12T18:46:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c2d065542aa34aecb9667496498e7e7f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0367-598X
2217-7426
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T18:46:25Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Association of Chemical Engineers of Serbia
record_format Article
series Hemijska Industrija
spelling doaj.art-c2d065542aa34aecb9667496498e7e7f2022-12-22T03:20:36ZengAssociation of Chemical Engineers of SerbiaHemijska Industrija0367-598X2217-74262017-01-0171211111810.2298/HEMIND140604071S0367-598X1400071SSome parameters of nutritional quality of meat obtained from Mangalitsa and Landrace pig breedsŠević Radoslav J.0Lukač Dragomir R.1Vidivić Vitomir S.2Puvača Nikola M.3Savić Božidar M.4Ljubojević Dragana B.5Tomović Vladimir M.6Džinić Natalija R.7Meat Industry , Joint-stoc company "Bačka", Bačka PalankaFaculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science, Novi SadFaculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science, Novi SadFaculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science, Novi SadFaculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science, Novi SadScientific Institute of Veterinary Medicine "Novi Sad", Novi SadFaculty of Technology, Novi SadFaculty of Technology, Novi SadThe aim of this study was to provide a comparative analysis of chemical and fatty acid composition, as well as of the connective tissue proteins in pigs of different genotypes, Mangalitsa and Landrace. Both pig genotypes were fed with the same feed of standard composition and quality. At the end of the fattening period, in total 24 pigs of both genotypes were slaughtered. Based on the analysis of the chemical composition we came to the conclusion that the protein content in both genotypes was similar. Moisture and ash content in the Landrace pig genotype differed significantly (P < 0.01) compared with genotype of Mangalitsa breed. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.01) were established in the fat content, which was 7.95 g/100 g, in pigs of Mangalitsa breed and 1.59 g/100 g in the Landrace pigs breed. Content of hydroxyproline, non-proteinogenic amino acids, in meat of Landrace was significantly higher (P < 0.01) compared to the content in the Mangalitsa breed. The same tendency was observed with regard to the connective tissue protein content, as well as with the relative connective tissue protein content. The fatty acid composition of the meat indicated that the most common saturated fatty acid (SFA) in both tested breeds was palmitic fatty acid (C16), whose content was significantly higher in Landrace (P < 0.01) compared with its content in Mangalitsa breed. In addition, the share of stearic acid (C18) was significantly higher (P < 0.01) in Landrace compared to Mangalitsa pig breed, what significantly contributed to the increase of the SFA share in Landrace compared to Mangalitsa breed. The most common monounsaturated fatty acid in both pig breeds was the oleic fatty acid (C18:1), whose share was significantly higher in Mangalitsa compared to the Landrace breed (P < 0.01). Out of the polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), linoleic fatty acid (C18:2) was the most predominant in both pig breeds, with no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05). The content of PUFA was not statistically significantly different between the tested breeds, as well as the content of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids, which caused no statistically significant differences in the n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio. Ratio of the unsaturated fatty acids, i.e., of the sum of MUFA and PUFA, and of the saturated fatty acids was significantly higher in Mangalitsa compared to Landrace breed (1.86 vs. 1.4), and the same was observed when it comes to the relationship MUFA/SFA (1.51 in Mangalitsa vs. 1.08 in Landrace breed) and MUFA/PUFA (4.35 vs. 3.38).http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0367-598X/2017/0367-598X1400071S.pdfMangalitsaLandracemeat qualityacids
spellingShingle Šević Radoslav J.
Lukač Dragomir R.
Vidivić Vitomir S.
Puvača Nikola M.
Savić Božidar M.
Ljubojević Dragana B.
Tomović Vladimir M.
Džinić Natalija R.
Some parameters of nutritional quality of meat obtained from Mangalitsa and Landrace pig breeds
Hemijska Industrija
Mangalitsa
Landrace
meat quality
acids
title Some parameters of nutritional quality of meat obtained from Mangalitsa and Landrace pig breeds
title_full Some parameters of nutritional quality of meat obtained from Mangalitsa and Landrace pig breeds
title_fullStr Some parameters of nutritional quality of meat obtained from Mangalitsa and Landrace pig breeds
title_full_unstemmed Some parameters of nutritional quality of meat obtained from Mangalitsa and Landrace pig breeds
title_short Some parameters of nutritional quality of meat obtained from Mangalitsa and Landrace pig breeds
title_sort some parameters of nutritional quality of meat obtained from mangalitsa and landrace pig breeds
topic Mangalitsa
Landrace
meat quality
acids
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0367-598X/2017/0367-598X1400071S.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sevicradoslavj someparametersofnutritionalqualityofmeatobtainedfrommangalitsaandlandracepigbreeds
AT lukacdragomirr someparametersofnutritionalqualityofmeatobtainedfrommangalitsaandlandracepigbreeds
AT vidivicvitomirs someparametersofnutritionalqualityofmeatobtainedfrommangalitsaandlandracepigbreeds
AT puvacanikolam someparametersofnutritionalqualityofmeatobtainedfrommangalitsaandlandracepigbreeds
AT savicbozidarm someparametersofnutritionalqualityofmeatobtainedfrommangalitsaandlandracepigbreeds
AT ljubojevicdraganab someparametersofnutritionalqualityofmeatobtainedfrommangalitsaandlandracepigbreeds
AT tomovicvladimirm someparametersofnutritionalqualityofmeatobtainedfrommangalitsaandlandracepigbreeds
AT dzinicnatalijar someparametersofnutritionalqualityofmeatobtainedfrommangalitsaandlandracepigbreeds