Dialektik als Logik des Scheins. Zu Kants Lektüre von Michael Piccarts Isagoge
An unrecognised copy (1665) in Kant’s private library of Michael Piccart’s Isagoge (1605), an introduction to the system of Aristotelian philosophy together with Kant’s own remarks on this author (Refl 4160, AA 17, p. 439) can be established as an original source for the Kantian ‘ideosphere’. First,...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
2022-09-01
|
| Series: | Кантовский сборник |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.kantiana.ru/kant_collection/5188/37597/ |
| _version_ | 1811308093567401984 |
|---|---|
| author | Martin Walter |
| author_facet | Martin Walter |
| author_sort | Martin Walter |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | An unrecognised copy (1665) in Kant’s private library of Michael Piccart’s Isagoge (1605), an introduction to the system of Aristotelian philosophy together with Kant’s own remarks on this author (Refl 4160, AA 17, p. 439) can be established as an original source for the Kantian ‘ideosphere’. First, I point out contexts and consequences of Piccart’s Altdorfian Aristotelianism, in contrast to the Königsbergian Aristotelianism (emphasised by Tonelli’s research). To further check the quality of Piccart as a source of Kant’s, a conceptual case-study is elaborated with Kant’s critical distinction between analytics as a “logic of truth” (KrV, B 85) and dialectics as a “logic of illusion” (KrV, B 86). Hereby, dialectics is understood as part of an Aristotelian division of logic in analytics, dialectics and sophistics (Königsberg/Rabe versus Altdorf/Piccart). As will be shown by the paradigmatic case of the famous Königsbergian proponent of Aristotelianism, Paul Rabe, Kant cannot have received the suggestion for his own critical distinction from Rabe’s Cursus Philosophicus. Instead, Piccart refers to a passage of Aristotle’s Metaphysics, which suggests the very distinction between an analytic philosopher who searches for scientific truth and dialecticians and sophists. For different reasons, they do not claim any scientific seriousness.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T09:17:02Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c2d70acb253a4e9eaedd59195fbe9002 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0207-6918 2310-3701 |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T09:17:02Z |
| publishDate | 2022-09-01 |
| publisher | Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Кантовский сборник |
| spelling | doaj.art-c2d70acb253a4e9eaedd59195fbe90022022-12-22T02:52:43ZdeuImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal UniversityКантовский сборник0207-69182310-37012022-09-0141374110.5922/0207-6918-2022-3-1Dialektik als Logik des Scheins. Zu Kants Lektüre von Michael Piccarts IsagogeMartin Walter0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2787-2960VinzenzPallotti-UniversityAn unrecognised copy (1665) in Kant’s private library of Michael Piccart’s Isagoge (1605), an introduction to the system of Aristotelian philosophy together with Kant’s own remarks on this author (Refl 4160, AA 17, p. 439) can be established as an original source for the Kantian ‘ideosphere’. First, I point out contexts and consequences of Piccart’s Altdorfian Aristotelianism, in contrast to the Königsbergian Aristotelianism (emphasised by Tonelli’s research). To further check the quality of Piccart as a source of Kant’s, a conceptual case-study is elaborated with Kant’s critical distinction between analytics as a “logic of truth” (KrV, B 85) and dialectics as a “logic of illusion” (KrV, B 86). Hereby, dialectics is understood as part of an Aristotelian division of logic in analytics, dialectics and sophistics (Königsberg/Rabe versus Altdorf/Piccart). As will be shown by the paradigmatic case of the famous Königsbergian proponent of Aristotelianism, Paul Rabe, Kant cannot have received the suggestion for his own critical distinction from Rabe’s Cursus Philosophicus. Instead, Piccart refers to a passage of Aristotle’s Metaphysics, which suggests the very distinction between an analytic philosopher who searches for scientific truth and dialecticians and sophists. For different reasons, they do not claim any scientific seriousness. https://journals.kantiana.ru/kant_collection/5188/37597/kantaristotelianismkönigsbergaltdorfdialecticslogic of illusionlogic of truthsophistsmichael piccartisagogepaul rabe |
| spellingShingle | Martin Walter Dialektik als Logik des Scheins. Zu Kants Lektüre von Michael Piccarts Isagoge Кантовский сборник kant aristotelianism königsberg altdorf dialectics logic of illusion logic of truth sophists michael piccart isagoge paul rabe |
| title | Dialektik als Logik des Scheins. Zu Kants Lektüre von Michael Piccarts Isagoge |
| title_full | Dialektik als Logik des Scheins. Zu Kants Lektüre von Michael Piccarts Isagoge |
| title_fullStr | Dialektik als Logik des Scheins. Zu Kants Lektüre von Michael Piccarts Isagoge |
| title_full_unstemmed | Dialektik als Logik des Scheins. Zu Kants Lektüre von Michael Piccarts Isagoge |
| title_short | Dialektik als Logik des Scheins. Zu Kants Lektüre von Michael Piccarts Isagoge |
| title_sort | dialektik als logik des scheins zu kants lekture von michael piccarts isagoge |
| topic | kant aristotelianism königsberg altdorf dialectics logic of illusion logic of truth sophists michael piccart isagoge paul rabe |
| url | https://journals.kantiana.ru/kant_collection/5188/37597/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT martinwalter dialektikalslogikdesscheinszukantslekturevonmichaelpiccartsisagoge |