Ten-core versus 16-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy for detection of prostatic carcinoma: a prospective comparative study in Indian population

To compare the cancer detection rate in patients with raised serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) results between the 10-core and the 16-core biopsy techniques in an Indian population. Methods: Between November 2010 and November 2012, 95 men aged >50...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: V. Surya Prakash, G. Chandra Mohan, S. Venkata Krishnaiah, V. Vijaykumar, G. Ramesh Babu, G. Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2013-12-01
Colección:Prostate International
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888215300362
_version_ 1827842348499861504
author V. Surya Prakash
G. Chandra Mohan
S. Venkata Krishnaiah
V. Vijaykumar
G. Ramesh Babu
G. Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy
author_facet V. Surya Prakash
G. Chandra Mohan
S. Venkata Krishnaiah
V. Vijaykumar
G. Ramesh Babu
G. Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy
author_sort V. Surya Prakash
collection DOAJ
description To compare the cancer detection rate in patients with raised serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) results between the 10-core and the 16-core biopsy techniques in an Indian population. Methods: Between November 2010 and November 2012, 95 men aged >50 years who presented to the Urology Department with lower urinary tract symptoms, elevated serum PSA, and/or abnormal DRE findings underwent transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. A total of 53 patients underwent 10-core biopsy and 42 patients underwent 16-core biopsy. Results: Of the 53 men in the 10-core group, 8 had cancer, whereas in the 16-core biopsy group, 23 of 42 men had cancer. Detection of prostate cancer was significantly higher in patients who underwent 16-core biopsy than in those who underwent 10-core biopsy (P<0.001). Among the 95 men, 44 men had abnormal DRE findings (46.3%), of whom 23 showed cancer (52.27%). Of 51 men with normal DRE findings and elevated PSA, 8 men had malignancy with a cancer detection rate of 15.68%. Among 20 men with PSA between 4.1 and 10 ng/mL, 2 (10%) had cancer. In 31 men with PSA between 10.1 and 20 ng/mL, 3 cancers (9.67%) were detected, and in 44 men with PSA >20 ng/mL, 26 cancers were detected (59.09%). Conclusions: The cancer detection rate with 16-core TRUS-guided biopsy is significantly higher than that with 10-core biopsy (54.76% vs. 15.09%, P<0.001). In patients with both normal and abnormal DRE findings, 16-core biopsy has a better detection rate than the 10-core biopsy protocol. With increasing PSA, there is a high rate of detection of prostate cancer in both 10-core and 16-core biopsy patients.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T08:08:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c2dc311de60f41f1bcbf901bddef4414
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2287-8882
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T08:08:11Z
publishDate 2013-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Prostate International
spelling doaj.art-c2dc311de60f41f1bcbf901bddef44142023-09-02T19:21:14ZengElsevierProstate International2287-88822013-12-011416316810.12954/PI.13025Ten-core versus 16-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy for detection of prostatic carcinoma: a prospective comparative study in Indian populationV. Surya PrakashG. Chandra MohanS. Venkata KrishnaiahV. VijaykumarG. Ramesh BabuG. Vijaya Bhaskar ReddyTo compare the cancer detection rate in patients with raised serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) results between the 10-core and the 16-core biopsy techniques in an Indian population. Methods: Between November 2010 and November 2012, 95 men aged >50 years who presented to the Urology Department with lower urinary tract symptoms, elevated serum PSA, and/or abnormal DRE findings underwent transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. A total of 53 patients underwent 10-core biopsy and 42 patients underwent 16-core biopsy. Results: Of the 53 men in the 10-core group, 8 had cancer, whereas in the 16-core biopsy group, 23 of 42 men had cancer. Detection of prostate cancer was significantly higher in patients who underwent 16-core biopsy than in those who underwent 10-core biopsy (P<0.001). Among the 95 men, 44 men had abnormal DRE findings (46.3%), of whom 23 showed cancer (52.27%). Of 51 men with normal DRE findings and elevated PSA, 8 men had malignancy with a cancer detection rate of 15.68%. Among 20 men with PSA between 4.1 and 10 ng/mL, 2 (10%) had cancer. In 31 men with PSA between 10.1 and 20 ng/mL, 3 cancers (9.67%) were detected, and in 44 men with PSA >20 ng/mL, 26 cancers were detected (59.09%). Conclusions: The cancer detection rate with 16-core TRUS-guided biopsy is significantly higher than that with 10-core biopsy (54.76% vs. 15.09%, P<0.001). In patients with both normal and abnormal DRE findings, 16-core biopsy has a better detection rate than the 10-core biopsy protocol. With increasing PSA, there is a high rate of detection of prostate cancer in both 10-core and 16-core biopsy patients.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888215300362Prostate neoplasmsProstate-specific antigenDigital rectal examinationTransrectal ultrasonographyProstate biopsy
spellingShingle V. Surya Prakash
G. Chandra Mohan
S. Venkata Krishnaiah
V. Vijaykumar
G. Ramesh Babu
G. Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy
Ten-core versus 16-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy for detection of prostatic carcinoma: a prospective comparative study in Indian population
Prostate International
Prostate neoplasms
Prostate-specific antigen
Digital rectal examination
Transrectal ultrasonography
Prostate biopsy
title Ten-core versus 16-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy for detection of prostatic carcinoma: a prospective comparative study in Indian population
title_full Ten-core versus 16-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy for detection of prostatic carcinoma: a prospective comparative study in Indian population
title_fullStr Ten-core versus 16-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy for detection of prostatic carcinoma: a prospective comparative study in Indian population
title_full_unstemmed Ten-core versus 16-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy for detection of prostatic carcinoma: a prospective comparative study in Indian population
title_short Ten-core versus 16-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy for detection of prostatic carcinoma: a prospective comparative study in Indian population
title_sort ten core versus 16 core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy for detection of prostatic carcinoma a prospective comparative study in indian population
topic Prostate neoplasms
Prostate-specific antigen
Digital rectal examination
Transrectal ultrasonography
Prostate biopsy
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888215300362
work_keys_str_mv AT vsuryaprakash tencoreversus16coretransrectalultrasonographyguidedprostatebiopsyfordetectionofprostaticcarcinomaaprospectivecomparativestudyinindianpopulation
AT gchandramohan tencoreversus16coretransrectalultrasonographyguidedprostatebiopsyfordetectionofprostaticcarcinomaaprospectivecomparativestudyinindianpopulation
AT svenkatakrishnaiah tencoreversus16coretransrectalultrasonographyguidedprostatebiopsyfordetectionofprostaticcarcinomaaprospectivecomparativestudyinindianpopulation
AT vvijaykumar tencoreversus16coretransrectalultrasonographyguidedprostatebiopsyfordetectionofprostaticcarcinomaaprospectivecomparativestudyinindianpopulation
AT grameshbabu tencoreversus16coretransrectalultrasonographyguidedprostatebiopsyfordetectionofprostaticcarcinomaaprospectivecomparativestudyinindianpopulation
AT gvijayabhaskarreddy tencoreversus16coretransrectalultrasonographyguidedprostatebiopsyfordetectionofprostaticcarcinomaaprospectivecomparativestudyinindianpopulation