A systems thinking approach for eliciting mental models from visual boundary objects in hydropolitical contexts: a case study from the Pilcomayo River Basin
Transboundary collaborations related to international freshwater are critical for ensuring equitable, efficient, and sustainable shared access to our planet's most fundamental resources. Visual artifacts, such as knowledge maps, functioning as boundary objects, are used in hydropolitical contex...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Resilience Alliance
2019-07-01
|
Series: | Ecology and Society |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol24/iss2/art9/ |
_version_ | 1819041556094517248 |
---|---|
author | Riveraine S. Walters Erin S. Kenzie Alexander E. Metzger William Jesse Baltutis Kakali B. Chakrabarti Shana Lee. Hirsch Bethany K. Laursen |
author_facet | Riveraine S. Walters Erin S. Kenzie Alexander E. Metzger William Jesse Baltutis Kakali B. Chakrabarti Shana Lee. Hirsch Bethany K. Laursen |
author_sort | Riveraine S. Walters |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Transboundary collaborations related to international freshwater are critical for ensuring equitable, efficient, and sustainable shared access to our planet's most fundamental resources. Visual artifacts, such as knowledge maps, functioning as boundary objects, are used in hydropolitical contexts to convey understandings and facilitate discussion across scales about challenges and opportunities from multiple perspectives. Such focal points for discussion are valuable in creating shared, socially negotiated priorities and integrating diverse and often disparate cultural perspectives that naturally exist in the context of international transboundary water resources. Visual boundary objects can also represent the collective mental models of the actor countries and transboundary institutions and encompass their perspectives on the complex hydro-social cycles within specific "problem-shed" regions of the shared resources. To investigate and synthesize these multiple concepts, we developed a novel method of eliciting mental models from visual boundary objects in social-ecological contexts by combining content analysis with theoretical frameworks for boundary objects and systems thinking. Using this method, we analyzed visual boundary objects represented in publicly available documents formally related to decision making in the Pilcomayo River Basin in South America. The Pilcomayo River Basin is a unique case for investigating decision making in international collaboration among represented states, given the unique social and biophysical challenges that have plagued the region for over a century. Using our framework, we were able to develop insight into the collective mental models of stakeholders, organizations, and decision-making institutions, related to priorities, vulnerabilities, and adaptation strategies among the various socioeconomic, cultural, political, and biophysical drivers for different regions and scales of the basin. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-21T09:26:52Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-c2dc5c6b8e484fb6a7409799bc9180ea |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1708-3087 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-21T09:26:52Z |
publishDate | 2019-07-01 |
publisher | Resilience Alliance |
record_format | Article |
series | Ecology and Society |
spelling | doaj.art-c2dc5c6b8e484fb6a7409799bc9180ea2022-12-21T19:08:52ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872019-07-01242910.5751/ES-10586-24020910586A systems thinking approach for eliciting mental models from visual boundary objects in hydropolitical contexts: a case study from the Pilcomayo River BasinRiveraine S. Walters0Erin S. Kenzie1Alexander E. Metzger2William Jesse Baltutis3Kakali B. Chakrabarti4Shana Lee. Hirsch5Bethany K. Laursen6University of Idaho Water Resources ProgramPortland State University System Science ProgramUniversity of Massachusetts Boston School for the EnvironmentUniversity of Victoria Water Innovation and Global Governance (WIGG) LabAustin Peay State University, Department of CommunicationUniversity of Washington Department of Human Centered Design and EngineeringMichigan State University Department of Community SustainabilityTransboundary collaborations related to international freshwater are critical for ensuring equitable, efficient, and sustainable shared access to our planet's most fundamental resources. Visual artifacts, such as knowledge maps, functioning as boundary objects, are used in hydropolitical contexts to convey understandings and facilitate discussion across scales about challenges and opportunities from multiple perspectives. Such focal points for discussion are valuable in creating shared, socially negotiated priorities and integrating diverse and often disparate cultural perspectives that naturally exist in the context of international transboundary water resources. Visual boundary objects can also represent the collective mental models of the actor countries and transboundary institutions and encompass their perspectives on the complex hydro-social cycles within specific "problem-shed" regions of the shared resources. To investigate and synthesize these multiple concepts, we developed a novel method of eliciting mental models from visual boundary objects in social-ecological contexts by combining content analysis with theoretical frameworks for boundary objects and systems thinking. Using this method, we analyzed visual boundary objects represented in publicly available documents formally related to decision making in the Pilcomayo River Basin in South America. The Pilcomayo River Basin is a unique case for investigating decision making in international collaboration among represented states, given the unique social and biophysical challenges that have plagued the region for over a century. Using our framework, we were able to develop insight into the collective mental models of stakeholders, organizations, and decision-making institutions, related to priorities, vulnerabilities, and adaptation strategies among the various socioeconomic, cultural, political, and biophysical drivers for different regions and scales of the basin.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol24/iss2/art9/boundary objectshydropoliticsmental modelssocial-ecological systemssystems thinking |
spellingShingle | Riveraine S. Walters Erin S. Kenzie Alexander E. Metzger William Jesse Baltutis Kakali B. Chakrabarti Shana Lee. Hirsch Bethany K. Laursen A systems thinking approach for eliciting mental models from visual boundary objects in hydropolitical contexts: a case study from the Pilcomayo River Basin Ecology and Society boundary objects hydropolitics mental models social-ecological systems systems thinking |
title | A systems thinking approach for eliciting mental models from visual boundary objects in hydropolitical contexts: a case study from the Pilcomayo River Basin |
title_full | A systems thinking approach for eliciting mental models from visual boundary objects in hydropolitical contexts: a case study from the Pilcomayo River Basin |
title_fullStr | A systems thinking approach for eliciting mental models from visual boundary objects in hydropolitical contexts: a case study from the Pilcomayo River Basin |
title_full_unstemmed | A systems thinking approach for eliciting mental models from visual boundary objects in hydropolitical contexts: a case study from the Pilcomayo River Basin |
title_short | A systems thinking approach for eliciting mental models from visual boundary objects in hydropolitical contexts: a case study from the Pilcomayo River Basin |
title_sort | systems thinking approach for eliciting mental models from visual boundary objects in hydropolitical contexts a case study from the pilcomayo river basin |
topic | boundary objects hydropolitics mental models social-ecological systems systems thinking |
url | http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol24/iss2/art9/ |
work_keys_str_mv | AT riveraineswalters asystemsthinkingapproachforelicitingmentalmodelsfromvisualboundaryobjectsinhydropoliticalcontextsacasestudyfromthepilcomayoriverbasin AT erinskenzie asystemsthinkingapproachforelicitingmentalmodelsfromvisualboundaryobjectsinhydropoliticalcontextsacasestudyfromthepilcomayoriverbasin AT alexanderemetzger asystemsthinkingapproachforelicitingmentalmodelsfromvisualboundaryobjectsinhydropoliticalcontextsacasestudyfromthepilcomayoriverbasin AT williamjessebaltutis asystemsthinkingapproachforelicitingmentalmodelsfromvisualboundaryobjectsinhydropoliticalcontextsacasestudyfromthepilcomayoriverbasin AT kakalibchakrabarti asystemsthinkingapproachforelicitingmentalmodelsfromvisualboundaryobjectsinhydropoliticalcontextsacasestudyfromthepilcomayoriverbasin AT shanaleehirsch asystemsthinkingapproachforelicitingmentalmodelsfromvisualboundaryobjectsinhydropoliticalcontextsacasestudyfromthepilcomayoriverbasin AT bethanyklaursen asystemsthinkingapproachforelicitingmentalmodelsfromvisualboundaryobjectsinhydropoliticalcontextsacasestudyfromthepilcomayoriverbasin AT riveraineswalters systemsthinkingapproachforelicitingmentalmodelsfromvisualboundaryobjectsinhydropoliticalcontextsacasestudyfromthepilcomayoriverbasin AT erinskenzie systemsthinkingapproachforelicitingmentalmodelsfromvisualboundaryobjectsinhydropoliticalcontextsacasestudyfromthepilcomayoriverbasin AT alexanderemetzger systemsthinkingapproachforelicitingmentalmodelsfromvisualboundaryobjectsinhydropoliticalcontextsacasestudyfromthepilcomayoriverbasin AT williamjessebaltutis systemsthinkingapproachforelicitingmentalmodelsfromvisualboundaryobjectsinhydropoliticalcontextsacasestudyfromthepilcomayoriverbasin AT kakalibchakrabarti systemsthinkingapproachforelicitingmentalmodelsfromvisualboundaryobjectsinhydropoliticalcontextsacasestudyfromthepilcomayoriverbasin AT shanaleehirsch systemsthinkingapproachforelicitingmentalmodelsfromvisualboundaryobjectsinhydropoliticalcontextsacasestudyfromthepilcomayoriverbasin AT bethanyklaursen systemsthinkingapproachforelicitingmentalmodelsfromvisualboundaryobjectsinhydropoliticalcontextsacasestudyfromthepilcomayoriverbasin |