Growing hairs in shorn cattle
The shearing operation can provide double benefits to the cattle: they can become more heat tolerant and the tick infestation decreases. The cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus causes great losses to dairy cattle, especially to the Holstein cattle because they are very susceptible to thi...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Instituto de Zootecnia
2013-12-01
|
| Series: | Boletim de Indústria Animal |
| Online Access: | http://revistas.bvs-vet.org.br/bia/article/view/11884 |
| _version_ | 1818910742465740800 |
|---|---|
| author | Cecília José Veríssimo Selma D'Agostino Fernanda Pessoa Luciandra Macedo de Toledo Keila Maria Roncato Duarte |
| author_facet | Cecília José Veríssimo Selma D'Agostino Fernanda Pessoa Luciandra Macedo de Toledo Keila Maria Roncato Duarte |
| author_sort | Cecília José Veríssimo |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The shearing operation can provide double benefits to the cattle: they can become more heat tolerant and the tick infestation decreases. The cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus causes great losses to dairy cattle, especially to the Holstein cattle because they are very susceptible to this tick. Its control is becoming each day more difficult, owing to the increasing resistance to acaricides they are acquiring. The objective of this work was to study the growing of haircoat following shearing. We made our experiment with 17 animals, 7 females and 10 males. They were shaved on the anterior third (head, neck, dewlap, scapula and arm) of one side, at random. The work was performed in two steps: they were shorn for the first time on August 2<sup>nd</sup> 2012, with a size 10 blade in a clipper Oster model GoldenA5, which left the fur coat 2 mm long. Then we evaluated the hair length growing by collecting fortnightly three sample of hairs in the middle of the scapula, with electric pliers, modified for this purpose, in both sides of the animals, sheared and non-sheared, until 30 days after this shearing. The three hair samples were put inside a little plastic bag per animal. Meanwhile, as we thought that the animals shearing had to be done closer to the skin, we decided to shear them again (in the same side shorn before), on October 2<sup>nd</sup> 2012. We changed our procedure using the same machine, but now with a blade size 30, which left the fur coat 1mm thick. After that, we collected again, fortnightly, samples of hairs on both sides during 2 months. The 10 longest hairs in the plastig bag were measured using a graph paper and the average per animal was calculated in each data and blade. A random design was applied for statistical analysis, the hair length of both sides, sheared and non sheared were compared by a two related samples tests – Wilcoxon, in a non parametric test, using the SPSSP 12.0 program, in each data within each blade. Using blade size 10, hair decreased from average 21.26 ± 5.72 mm to 4.50 ± 0.83 mm. On the sheared side a hair growth of 26 mm was observed during the first two weeks, increasing to 40 mm for the next two weeks and at the end of 28 days there was still a significant difference (Z= -3.195; P= 0.001) for the non sheared hair (19.42 ± 7.33 mm) and sheared hair (11.15 ± 3.23 mm). Such procedure was done by the beginning of August, still winter time. Using the blade size 30, sheared hair had an average of 4.76 ± 1.1 mm. A 24 mm hair growth was observed for the first two weeks and 20 mm for the next two weeks, decreasing its growth speed to 9 mm and after 57 days no significant difference was observed between sheared side (11.47 ± 5.61 mm) and non sheared side (14.78 ± 8.06 mm, Z= -1.915; P= 0.055). Second cut was performed by the beginning of October, spring time, period where there is a change of hair in European cattle from winter season (thin and long hair) to summer season (thick and short hair), starting on spring time. In this work we could observe the fast growing of hair when cut was done in winter time and the closer to the skin the better the benefits to the animals, as heat tolerance and fewer tick infestations. If shearing is done in spring time, it must be every 45-50 days. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-19T22:47:38Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c2e204706f63441789cdb23de7da4ab6 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1981-4100 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-19T22:47:38Z |
| publishDate | 2013-12-01 |
| publisher | Instituto de Zootecnia |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Boletim de Indústria Animal |
| spelling | doaj.art-c2e204706f63441789cdb23de7da4ab62022-12-21T20:02:55ZengInstituto de ZootecniaBoletim de Indústria Animal1981-41002013-12-0170supl.11057Growing hairs in shorn cattleCecília José Veríssimo0Selma D'Agostino1Fernanda Pessoa2Luciandra Macedo de Toledo3Keila Maria Roncato Duarte4Instituto de Zootecnia, Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios, Nova Odessa, SPInstituto de Zootecnia, Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios, Nova Odessa, SPInstituto de Zootecnia, Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios, Nova Odessa, SPInstituto de Zootecnia, Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios, Nova Odessa, SPInstituto de Zootecnia, Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios, Nova Odessa, SPThe shearing operation can provide double benefits to the cattle: they can become more heat tolerant and the tick infestation decreases. The cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus causes great losses to dairy cattle, especially to the Holstein cattle because they are very susceptible to this tick. Its control is becoming each day more difficult, owing to the increasing resistance to acaricides they are acquiring. The objective of this work was to study the growing of haircoat following shearing. We made our experiment with 17 animals, 7 females and 10 males. They were shaved on the anterior third (head, neck, dewlap, scapula and arm) of one side, at random. The work was performed in two steps: they were shorn for the first time on August 2<sup>nd</sup> 2012, with a size 10 blade in a clipper Oster model GoldenA5, which left the fur coat 2 mm long. Then we evaluated the hair length growing by collecting fortnightly three sample of hairs in the middle of the scapula, with electric pliers, modified for this purpose, in both sides of the animals, sheared and non-sheared, until 30 days after this shearing. The three hair samples were put inside a little plastic bag per animal. Meanwhile, as we thought that the animals shearing had to be done closer to the skin, we decided to shear them again (in the same side shorn before), on October 2<sup>nd</sup> 2012. We changed our procedure using the same machine, but now with a blade size 30, which left the fur coat 1mm thick. After that, we collected again, fortnightly, samples of hairs on both sides during 2 months. The 10 longest hairs in the plastig bag were measured using a graph paper and the average per animal was calculated in each data and blade. A random design was applied for statistical analysis, the hair length of both sides, sheared and non sheared were compared by a two related samples tests – Wilcoxon, in a non parametric test, using the SPSSP 12.0 program, in each data within each blade. Using blade size 10, hair decreased from average 21.26 ± 5.72 mm to 4.50 ± 0.83 mm. On the sheared side a hair growth of 26 mm was observed during the first two weeks, increasing to 40 mm for the next two weeks and at the end of 28 days there was still a significant difference (Z= -3.195; P= 0.001) for the non sheared hair (19.42 ± 7.33 mm) and sheared hair (11.15 ± 3.23 mm). Such procedure was done by the beginning of August, still winter time. Using the blade size 30, sheared hair had an average of 4.76 ± 1.1 mm. A 24 mm hair growth was observed for the first two weeks and 20 mm for the next two weeks, decreasing its growth speed to 9 mm and after 57 days no significant difference was observed between sheared side (11.47 ± 5.61 mm) and non sheared side (14.78 ± 8.06 mm, Z= -1.915; P= 0.055). Second cut was performed by the beginning of October, spring time, period where there is a change of hair in European cattle from winter season (thin and long hair) to summer season (thick and short hair), starting on spring time. In this work we could observe the fast growing of hair when cut was done in winter time and the closer to the skin the better the benefits to the animals, as heat tolerance and fewer tick infestations. If shearing is done in spring time, it must be every 45-50 days.http://revistas.bvs-vet.org.br/bia/article/view/11884 |
| spellingShingle | Cecília José Veríssimo Selma D'Agostino Fernanda Pessoa Luciandra Macedo de Toledo Keila Maria Roncato Duarte Growing hairs in shorn cattle Boletim de Indústria Animal |
| title | Growing hairs in shorn cattle |
| title_full | Growing hairs in shorn cattle |
| title_fullStr | Growing hairs in shorn cattle |
| title_full_unstemmed | Growing hairs in shorn cattle |
| title_short | Growing hairs in shorn cattle |
| title_sort | growing hairs in shorn cattle |
| url | http://revistas.bvs-vet.org.br/bia/article/view/11884 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ceciliajoseverissimo growinghairsinshorncattle AT selmadagostino growinghairsinshorncattle AT fernandapessoa growinghairsinshorncattle AT luciandramacedodetoledo growinghairsinshorncattle AT keilamariaroncatoduarte growinghairsinshorncattle |