Drug and pesticide usage for sea lice treatment in salmon aquaculture sites in a Canadian province from 2016 to 2019

Abstract We used 4 years of publicly available data (2016–2019) on chemical usage at salmon sites with information on production, stocking, locations and environmental conditions to explore patterns of anti-sea lice treatments in a Canadian province. Results show that sequential chemical treatments...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dounia Hamoutene, Vanessa Oldford, Sebastien Donnet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2022-03-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08538-w
_version_ 1818315384393039872
author Dounia Hamoutene
Vanessa Oldford
Sebastien Donnet
author_facet Dounia Hamoutene
Vanessa Oldford
Sebastien Donnet
author_sort Dounia Hamoutene
collection DOAJ
description Abstract We used 4 years of publicly available data (2016–2019) on chemical usage at salmon sites with information on production, stocking, locations and environmental conditions to explore patterns of anti-sea lice treatments in a Canadian province. Results show that sequential chemical treatments are prevalent, emamectin benzoate (EMB) with azamethiphos being the most used combination with a decrease in ivermectin usage. Relatively high rates of usage of EMB per fish biomass may point to potential lice resistance patterns with information needed on mechanisms and local populations. Lower or no chemical usage at some sites indicate less sea lice infestations likely influenced by localized site conditions (coves), and a lessened need for medication due to the usage of cleaner fish and possibly other non-chemical methods (not documented in this report). The year/climate influenced chemical input only in sites with higher treatment levels likely due to effects on sea lice growth and reproduction. Observed differences between years are warmer surface temperature in the fall, a higher freshwater input in spring, and stronger wind conditions for 2017 and 2018 with more medication usage for these two years. The lack of significant effect of site distances calculated in zones of influence based on 24 h potential connectivity patterns highlight the need to refine the resolution of hydrodynamic processes.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T09:04:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c2e948b7127f4223bccc5c952179d59d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T09:04:41Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-c2e948b7127f4223bccc5c952179d59d2022-12-21T23:53:05ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-03-0112111510.1038/s41598-022-08538-wDrug and pesticide usage for sea lice treatment in salmon aquaculture sites in a Canadian province from 2016 to 2019Dounia Hamoutene0Vanessa Oldford1Sebastien Donnet2Saint Andrews Biological Station, Fisheries and Oceans CanadaNorthwest Atlantic Fisheries Center, Fisheries and Oceans CanadaNorthwest Atlantic Fisheries Center, Fisheries and Oceans CanadaAbstract We used 4 years of publicly available data (2016–2019) on chemical usage at salmon sites with information on production, stocking, locations and environmental conditions to explore patterns of anti-sea lice treatments in a Canadian province. Results show that sequential chemical treatments are prevalent, emamectin benzoate (EMB) with azamethiphos being the most used combination with a decrease in ivermectin usage. Relatively high rates of usage of EMB per fish biomass may point to potential lice resistance patterns with information needed on mechanisms and local populations. Lower or no chemical usage at some sites indicate less sea lice infestations likely influenced by localized site conditions (coves), and a lessened need for medication due to the usage of cleaner fish and possibly other non-chemical methods (not documented in this report). The year/climate influenced chemical input only in sites with higher treatment levels likely due to effects on sea lice growth and reproduction. Observed differences between years are warmer surface temperature in the fall, a higher freshwater input in spring, and stronger wind conditions for 2017 and 2018 with more medication usage for these two years. The lack of significant effect of site distances calculated in zones of influence based on 24 h potential connectivity patterns highlight the need to refine the resolution of hydrodynamic processes.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08538-w
spellingShingle Dounia Hamoutene
Vanessa Oldford
Sebastien Donnet
Drug and pesticide usage for sea lice treatment in salmon aquaculture sites in a Canadian province from 2016 to 2019
Scientific Reports
title Drug and pesticide usage for sea lice treatment in salmon aquaculture sites in a Canadian province from 2016 to 2019
title_full Drug and pesticide usage for sea lice treatment in salmon aquaculture sites in a Canadian province from 2016 to 2019
title_fullStr Drug and pesticide usage for sea lice treatment in salmon aquaculture sites in a Canadian province from 2016 to 2019
title_full_unstemmed Drug and pesticide usage for sea lice treatment in salmon aquaculture sites in a Canadian province from 2016 to 2019
title_short Drug and pesticide usage for sea lice treatment in salmon aquaculture sites in a Canadian province from 2016 to 2019
title_sort drug and pesticide usage for sea lice treatment in salmon aquaculture sites in a canadian province from 2016 to 2019
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08538-w
work_keys_str_mv AT douniahamoutene drugandpesticideusageforsealicetreatmentinsalmonaquaculturesitesinacanadianprovincefrom2016to2019
AT vanessaoldford drugandpesticideusageforsealicetreatmentinsalmonaquaculturesitesinacanadianprovincefrom2016to2019
AT sebastiendonnet drugandpesticideusageforsealicetreatmentinsalmonaquaculturesitesinacanadianprovincefrom2016to2019