Investigation of Circle Doubt (Obfuscation) and Circular Reasoning to the Evidence of the Principality of Existence

Islamic philosophy, with its foundations of ontology (ontological), has established the most basic foundations of rational theology. Uncertainty and gradation in these principles inflicts irreparable damage on theology in a special (more peculiar) sense and transforms it into another path with trans...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Muhammad Reza Ershadinia
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Razavi University of Islamic Sciences 2021-02-01
Series:آموزه‌‌های فلسفه اسلامي
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ipd.razavi.ac.ir/article_1297_da09562c342f1e2a7efa9ece92bb1aa7.pdf?lang=en
_version_ 1828437447823851520
author Muhammad Reza Ershadinia
author_facet Muhammad Reza Ershadinia
author_sort Muhammad Reza Ershadinia
collection DOAJ
description Islamic philosophy, with its foundations of ontology (ontological), has established the most basic foundations of rational theology. Uncertainty and gradation in these principles inflicts irreparable damage on theology in a special (more peculiar) sense and transforms it into another path with transformative consequences. Principality of existence has a prominent, visible and irreplaceable role among all the central principles of ontology. Transcendent Wisdom has established this principle by recognizing its effective role. Opponents of it have, as a result of some inconsistencies results with their presuppositions, such as the unity of existence, distorted and induced doubt in its proofs. The main doubt is the accusation of circle doubt and circular reasoning by a seemingly heterogeneous spectrum, including anti-philosophers and some separatists (gradationists) in a polemical method. In this opportunity, attention will be paid to four reasons that are in this doubt. These reasons are: the argument of the goodness of existence, the argument based on the difference between the effects of external existence and the mental existence, the argument based on the refusal (impossibility) of doubt in gradation the quiddity and the argument of intensified (intensifying) motion. By presenting the contents of these arguments, the content of the doubt will also be tested against them. The analysis shows that the skepticism is due to insufficient attention to the principles of these arguments.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T19:47:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c2f765686d03453295eeb76ca6adb0f0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2251-9386
2783-4026
language fas
last_indexed 2024-12-10T19:47:22Z
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher Razavi University of Islamic Sciences
record_format Article
series آموزه‌‌های فلسفه اسلامي
spelling doaj.art-c2f765686d03453295eeb76ca6adb0f02022-12-22T01:35:52ZfasRazavi University of Islamic Sciencesآموزه‌‌های فلسفه اسلامي2251-93862783-40262021-02-01152732210.30513/ipd.2021.1297 Investigation of Circle Doubt (Obfuscation) and Circular Reasoning to the Evidence of the Principality of ExistenceMuhammad Reza Ershadinia0Associate professor at Hakim Sabzevari University Islamic philosophy, with its foundations of ontology (ontological), has established the most basic foundations of rational theology. Uncertainty and gradation in these principles inflicts irreparable damage on theology in a special (more peculiar) sense and transforms it into another path with transformative consequences. Principality of existence has a prominent, visible and irreplaceable role among all the central principles of ontology. Transcendent Wisdom has established this principle by recognizing its effective role. Opponents of it have, as a result of some inconsistencies results with their presuppositions, such as the unity of existence, distorted and induced doubt in its proofs. The main doubt is the accusation of circle doubt and circular reasoning by a seemingly heterogeneous spectrum, including anti-philosophers and some separatists (gradationists) in a polemical method. In this opportunity, attention will be paid to four reasons that are in this doubt. These reasons are: the argument of the goodness of existence, the argument based on the difference between the effects of external existence and the mental existence, the argument based on the refusal (impossibility) of doubt in gradation the quiddity and the argument of intensified (intensifying) motion. By presenting the contents of these arguments, the content of the doubt will also be tested against them. The analysis shows that the skepticism is due to insufficient attention to the principles of these arguments.https://ipd.razavi.ac.ir/article_1297_da09562c342f1e2a7efa9ece92bb1aa7.pdf?lang=enprincipality of existencevalidity of quiddityontology
spellingShingle Muhammad Reza Ershadinia
Investigation of Circle Doubt (Obfuscation) and Circular Reasoning to the Evidence of the Principality of Existence
آموزه‌‌های فلسفه اسلامي
principality of existence
validity of quiddity
ontology
title Investigation of Circle Doubt (Obfuscation) and Circular Reasoning to the Evidence of the Principality of Existence
title_full Investigation of Circle Doubt (Obfuscation) and Circular Reasoning to the Evidence of the Principality of Existence
title_fullStr Investigation of Circle Doubt (Obfuscation) and Circular Reasoning to the Evidence of the Principality of Existence
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of Circle Doubt (Obfuscation) and Circular Reasoning to the Evidence of the Principality of Existence
title_short Investigation of Circle Doubt (Obfuscation) and Circular Reasoning to the Evidence of the Principality of Existence
title_sort investigation of circle doubt obfuscation and circular reasoning to the evidence of the principality of existence
topic principality of existence
validity of quiddity
ontology
url https://ipd.razavi.ac.ir/article_1297_da09562c342f1e2a7efa9ece92bb1aa7.pdf?lang=en
work_keys_str_mv AT muhammadrezaershadinia investigationofcircledoubtobfuscationandcircularreasoningtotheevidenceoftheprincipalityofexistence