Intraarticular bone grafting in atlantoaxial facet joints via a posterior approach: nonstructural or structural—a minimum 24-month follow-up

Abstract Objective To investigate the necessity of nonstructural or structural intraarticular bone grafting in atlantoaxial facet joints via a posterior approach and the influence by the presence of basilar invagination (BI). Methods From November 2016 to October 2018, patients who underwent posteri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jun Zhu, Jian Wu, Keyu Luo, Zhong Wang, Huaijian Jin, Yufei Jin, Yingbo Wang, Mingyong Liu, Peng Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-08-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02630-z
_version_ 1798042687704662016
author Jun Zhu
Jian Wu
Keyu Luo
Zhong Wang
Huaijian Jin
Yufei Jin
Yingbo Wang
Mingyong Liu
Peng Liu
author_facet Jun Zhu
Jian Wu
Keyu Luo
Zhong Wang
Huaijian Jin
Yufei Jin
Yingbo Wang
Mingyong Liu
Peng Liu
author_sort Jun Zhu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective To investigate the necessity of nonstructural or structural intraarticular bone grafting in atlantoaxial facet joints via a posterior approach and the influence by the presence of basilar invagination (BI). Methods From November 2016 to October 2018, patients who underwent posterior atlantoaxial or occipitocervical arthrodesis surgery at one institute were retrospectively reviewed. Operation records, preoperative and postoperative clinical status, and radiological films were analyzed. Results Thirty-three patients (19 without BI, 14 with BI) underwent posterior facet joint release followed by intraarticular bone grafting were enrolled finally. Twenty-four nonstructural (15 without BI, 9 with BI) and 9 structural (4 without BI, 5 with BI) grafting were performed. The average follow-up was 32.15±6.73 months (24–47 months). Among them, 1 (3.03%) implant failure occurred, and 32 (96.97%) achieved satisfactory neurological outcomes, including 28 (84.85%) complete and 4 (12.12%) acceptable reductions with complete fusion within 6 months. For patients without BI, structural and nonstructural grafting showed no significant difference in terms of reduction maintenance (100% vs 73.33%, p = 0.530), while for those with BI, structural grafting significantly increased the postoperative height of the joint space (5.67±1.22 mm vs 3.43±1.78 mm, p = 0.002) and maintained it much better than nonstructural grafting (88.89% vs 20.00%, p = 0.023), contributing notably to BI correction. Conclusion Intraarticular structural bone grafting in atlantoaxial facet joints has the advantage of maintaining anterior column height in the case of lateral mass collapse or when BI correction is needed; otherwise, nonstructural bone grafting is enough.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T22:38:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c3060fdc7fc34f2ab81d843e26d2aed0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-799X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T22:38:56Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj.art-c3060fdc7fc34f2ab81d843e26d2aed02022-12-22T03:59:07ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2021-08-011611910.1186/s13018-021-02630-zIntraarticular bone grafting in atlantoaxial facet joints via a posterior approach: nonstructural or structural—a minimum 24-month follow-upJun Zhu0Jian Wu1Keyu Luo2Zhong Wang3Huaijian Jin4Yufei Jin5Yingbo Wang6Mingyong Liu7Peng Liu8Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Daping Hospital of Army Medical UniversityDivision of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Daping Hospital of Army Medical UniversityDivision of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Daping Hospital of Army Medical UniversityDivision of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Daping Hospital of Army Medical UniversityDivision of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Daping Hospital of Army Medical UniversityDivision of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Daping Hospital of Army Medical UniversityDivision of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Daping Hospital of Army Medical UniversityDivision of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Daping Hospital of Army Medical UniversityDivision of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Daping Hospital of Army Medical UniversityAbstract Objective To investigate the necessity of nonstructural or structural intraarticular bone grafting in atlantoaxial facet joints via a posterior approach and the influence by the presence of basilar invagination (BI). Methods From November 2016 to October 2018, patients who underwent posterior atlantoaxial or occipitocervical arthrodesis surgery at one institute were retrospectively reviewed. Operation records, preoperative and postoperative clinical status, and radiological films were analyzed. Results Thirty-three patients (19 without BI, 14 with BI) underwent posterior facet joint release followed by intraarticular bone grafting were enrolled finally. Twenty-four nonstructural (15 without BI, 9 with BI) and 9 structural (4 without BI, 5 with BI) grafting were performed. The average follow-up was 32.15±6.73 months (24–47 months). Among them, 1 (3.03%) implant failure occurred, and 32 (96.97%) achieved satisfactory neurological outcomes, including 28 (84.85%) complete and 4 (12.12%) acceptable reductions with complete fusion within 6 months. For patients without BI, structural and nonstructural grafting showed no significant difference in terms of reduction maintenance (100% vs 73.33%, p = 0.530), while for those with BI, structural grafting significantly increased the postoperative height of the joint space (5.67±1.22 mm vs 3.43±1.78 mm, p = 0.002) and maintained it much better than nonstructural grafting (88.89% vs 20.00%, p = 0.023), contributing notably to BI correction. Conclusion Intraarticular structural bone grafting in atlantoaxial facet joints has the advantage of maintaining anterior column height in the case of lateral mass collapse or when BI correction is needed; otherwise, nonstructural bone grafting is enough.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02630-zBone graftingFusionAtlantoaxial complexFacet jointReduction
spellingShingle Jun Zhu
Jian Wu
Keyu Luo
Zhong Wang
Huaijian Jin
Yufei Jin
Yingbo Wang
Mingyong Liu
Peng Liu
Intraarticular bone grafting in atlantoaxial facet joints via a posterior approach: nonstructural or structural—a minimum 24-month follow-up
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Bone grafting
Fusion
Atlantoaxial complex
Facet joint
Reduction
title Intraarticular bone grafting in atlantoaxial facet joints via a posterior approach: nonstructural or structural—a minimum 24-month follow-up
title_full Intraarticular bone grafting in atlantoaxial facet joints via a posterior approach: nonstructural or structural—a minimum 24-month follow-up
title_fullStr Intraarticular bone grafting in atlantoaxial facet joints via a posterior approach: nonstructural or structural—a minimum 24-month follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Intraarticular bone grafting in atlantoaxial facet joints via a posterior approach: nonstructural or structural—a minimum 24-month follow-up
title_short Intraarticular bone grafting in atlantoaxial facet joints via a posterior approach: nonstructural or structural—a minimum 24-month follow-up
title_sort intraarticular bone grafting in atlantoaxial facet joints via a posterior approach nonstructural or structural a minimum 24 month follow up
topic Bone grafting
Fusion
Atlantoaxial complex
Facet joint
Reduction
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02630-z
work_keys_str_mv AT junzhu intraarticularbonegraftinginatlantoaxialfacetjointsviaaposteriorapproachnonstructuralorstructuralaminimum24monthfollowup
AT jianwu intraarticularbonegraftinginatlantoaxialfacetjointsviaaposteriorapproachnonstructuralorstructuralaminimum24monthfollowup
AT keyuluo intraarticularbonegraftinginatlantoaxialfacetjointsviaaposteriorapproachnonstructuralorstructuralaminimum24monthfollowup
AT zhongwang intraarticularbonegraftinginatlantoaxialfacetjointsviaaposteriorapproachnonstructuralorstructuralaminimum24monthfollowup
AT huaijianjin intraarticularbonegraftinginatlantoaxialfacetjointsviaaposteriorapproachnonstructuralorstructuralaminimum24monthfollowup
AT yufeijin intraarticularbonegraftinginatlantoaxialfacetjointsviaaposteriorapproachnonstructuralorstructuralaminimum24monthfollowup
AT yingbowang intraarticularbonegraftinginatlantoaxialfacetjointsviaaposteriorapproachnonstructuralorstructuralaminimum24monthfollowup
AT mingyongliu intraarticularbonegraftinginatlantoaxialfacetjointsviaaposteriorapproachnonstructuralorstructuralaminimum24monthfollowup
AT pengliu intraarticularbonegraftinginatlantoaxialfacetjointsviaaposteriorapproachnonstructuralorstructuralaminimum24monthfollowup