The Role of Electrolyte Composition in Enabling Li Metal‐Iron Fluoride Full‐Cell Batteries

Abstract FeF3 conversion cathodes, paired with Li metal, are promising for use in next‐generation secondary batteries and offer a remarkable theoretical energy density of 1947 Wh kg−1 compared to 690 Wh kg−1 for LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4; however, many successful studies on FeF3 cathodes are performed in cells...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bryan R. Wygant, Laura C. Merrill, Katharine L. Harrison, A. Alec Talin, David S. Ashby, Timothy N. Lambert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-04-01
Series:Advanced Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202105803
Description
Summary:Abstract FeF3 conversion cathodes, paired with Li metal, are promising for use in next‐generation secondary batteries and offer a remarkable theoretical energy density of 1947 Wh kg−1 compared to 690 Wh kg−1 for LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4; however, many successful studies on FeF3 cathodes are performed in cells with a large (>90‐fold) excess of Li that disguises the effects of tested variables on the anode and decreases the practical energy density of the battery. Herein, it is demonstrated that for full‐cell compatibility, the electrolyte must produce both a protective solid‐electrolyte interphase and cathode‐electrolyte interphase and that an electrolyte composed of 1:1.3:3 (m/m) LiFSI, 1,2‐dimethoxyethane, and 1,1,2,2‐tetrafluoroethyl‐2,2,3,3‐tetrafluoropropyl ether fulfills both these requirements. This work demonstrates the importance of verifying electrode level solutions on the full‐cell level when developing new battery chemistries and represents the first full cell demonstration of a Li/FeF3 cell, with both limited Li and high capacity FeF3 utilization.
ISSN:2198-3844