Risk from a top predator and forest structure influence scavenging by smaller carnivores
Abstract Large carcasses often attract multiple carnivore species, so subordinate carnivores must weigh the reward of a profitable meal with the risk of being attacked by dominant carnivores. These risk–reward trade‐offs are likely influenced by a variety of factors, including scale‐dependent risk f...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2023-07-01
|
| Series: | Ecosphere |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4596 |
| _version_ | 1797770771273089024 |
|---|---|
| author | Alex J. Jensen Elizabeth A. Saldo Zoey G. Chapman Joseph W. Butfiloski David S. Jachowski |
| author_facet | Alex J. Jensen Elizabeth A. Saldo Zoey G. Chapman Joseph W. Butfiloski David S. Jachowski |
| author_sort | Alex J. Jensen |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Large carcasses often attract multiple carnivore species, so subordinate carnivores must weigh the reward of a profitable meal with the risk of being attacked by dominant carnivores. These risk–reward trade‐offs are likely influenced by a variety of factors, including scale‐dependent risk from dominant carnivores (e.g., short‐ vs. long‐term risk) and the amount of carcass remaining. In the southeastern United States, human hunters provision a large amount of white‐tailed deer carrion, which appears to be an important food source for coyotes (a novel top predator), but we know little about how coyotes influence the scavenging behavior of smaller carnivores. In this study, we evaluated the relative importance of risk from coyotes, vulture activity, forest structure, and remaining food on bobcat, gray fox, raccoon, and opossum scavenging by deploying 71 deer carcasses within a managed forest in South Carolina during January 2020 and 2021. We found that coyotes only had direct effects on bobcat behavior, suggesting that competition for carcasses was greatest between these two species. However, the relative importance of long‐ versus short‐term risk from coyotes was dependent on the stage in the scavenging process. Effects from forest structure were also stage‐dependent, where tree density and age were related to carcass discovery for bobcats and raccoons, while minimal understory cover facilitated bobcat, gray fox, and opossum scavenging, despite short‐term risk from coyotes. Vulture activity appeared to serve as a cue for gray foxes to discover carcasses. Ultimately, we found that risk from coyotes had species‐specific and context‐dependent effects on smaller carnivore scavenging. This represents some of the first direct evidence of how coyotes alter smaller carnivore behavior in a region where coyotes are a novel top predator. However, forest structure (particularly understory cover) seemed to mediate risk from coyotes, highlighting how habitat can influence predator–predator interactions. Future research should also investigate these interactions during other times of the year and try to quantify how human‐provisioned carcasses influence populations and communities. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T21:28:00Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c31d7a4b3941477da22ebc5fbb4d7f6c |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2150-8925 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T21:28:00Z |
| publishDate | 2023-07-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ecosphere |
| spelling | doaj.art-c31d7a4b3941477da22ebc5fbb4d7f6c2023-07-28T05:34:33ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252023-07-01147n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.4596Risk from a top predator and forest structure influence scavenging by smaller carnivoresAlex J. Jensen0Elizabeth A. Saldo1Zoey G. Chapman2Joseph W. Butfiloski3David S. Jachowski4Department of Forestry and Environmental Conservation Clemson University Clemson South Carolina USADepartment of Forestry and Environmental Conservation Clemson University Clemson South Carolina USADepartment of Forestry and Environmental Conservation Clemson University Clemson South Carolina USASouth Carolina Department of Natural Resources Columbia South Carolina USADepartment of Forestry and Environmental Conservation Clemson University Clemson South Carolina USAAbstract Large carcasses often attract multiple carnivore species, so subordinate carnivores must weigh the reward of a profitable meal with the risk of being attacked by dominant carnivores. These risk–reward trade‐offs are likely influenced by a variety of factors, including scale‐dependent risk from dominant carnivores (e.g., short‐ vs. long‐term risk) and the amount of carcass remaining. In the southeastern United States, human hunters provision a large amount of white‐tailed deer carrion, which appears to be an important food source for coyotes (a novel top predator), but we know little about how coyotes influence the scavenging behavior of smaller carnivores. In this study, we evaluated the relative importance of risk from coyotes, vulture activity, forest structure, and remaining food on bobcat, gray fox, raccoon, and opossum scavenging by deploying 71 deer carcasses within a managed forest in South Carolina during January 2020 and 2021. We found that coyotes only had direct effects on bobcat behavior, suggesting that competition for carcasses was greatest between these two species. However, the relative importance of long‐ versus short‐term risk from coyotes was dependent on the stage in the scavenging process. Effects from forest structure were also stage‐dependent, where tree density and age were related to carcass discovery for bobcats and raccoons, while minimal understory cover facilitated bobcat, gray fox, and opossum scavenging, despite short‐term risk from coyotes. Vulture activity appeared to serve as a cue for gray foxes to discover carcasses. Ultimately, we found that risk from coyotes had species‐specific and context‐dependent effects on smaller carnivore scavenging. This represents some of the first direct evidence of how coyotes alter smaller carnivore behavior in a region where coyotes are a novel top predator. However, forest structure (particularly understory cover) seemed to mediate risk from coyotes, highlighting how habitat can influence predator–predator interactions. Future research should also investigate these interactions during other times of the year and try to quantify how human‐provisioned carcasses influence populations and communities.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4596carcasscarnivorecompetitioncoyote Canis latranspredation riskscavenging |
| spellingShingle | Alex J. Jensen Elizabeth A. Saldo Zoey G. Chapman Joseph W. Butfiloski David S. Jachowski Risk from a top predator and forest structure influence scavenging by smaller carnivores Ecosphere carcass carnivore competition coyote Canis latrans predation risk scavenging |
| title | Risk from a top predator and forest structure influence scavenging by smaller carnivores |
| title_full | Risk from a top predator and forest structure influence scavenging by smaller carnivores |
| title_fullStr | Risk from a top predator and forest structure influence scavenging by smaller carnivores |
| title_full_unstemmed | Risk from a top predator and forest structure influence scavenging by smaller carnivores |
| title_short | Risk from a top predator and forest structure influence scavenging by smaller carnivores |
| title_sort | risk from a top predator and forest structure influence scavenging by smaller carnivores |
| topic | carcass carnivore competition coyote Canis latrans predation risk scavenging |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4596 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT alexjjensen riskfromatoppredatorandforeststructureinfluencescavengingbysmallercarnivores AT elizabethasaldo riskfromatoppredatorandforeststructureinfluencescavengingbysmallercarnivores AT zoeygchapman riskfromatoppredatorandforeststructureinfluencescavengingbysmallercarnivores AT josephwbutfiloski riskfromatoppredatorandforeststructureinfluencescavengingbysmallercarnivores AT davidsjachowski riskfromatoppredatorandforeststructureinfluencescavengingbysmallercarnivores |