INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY&SECURITY INTERESTS: A US PERSPECTIVE

It is no secret that intellectual property can be a valuable business asset. As I.B.M.’s CEO, Samuel Palmisano, said, “ [I]ntellectual property is the crucial capital in a global knowledge economy.” 1 Expressing the same sentiment, a recently published article states that the “ driving force behind...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sarah Troelsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Aalborg University Open Publishing 2007-01-01
Series:Nordic Journal of Commercial Law
Online Access:https://130.225.53.24/index.php/NJCL/article/view/3030
_version_ 1797226312097595392
author Sarah Troelsen
author_facet Sarah Troelsen
author_sort Sarah Troelsen
collection DOAJ
description It is no secret that intellectual property can be a valuable business asset. As I.B.M.’s CEO, Samuel Palmisano, said, “ [I]ntellectual property is the crucial capital in a global knowledge economy.” 1 Expressing the same sentiment, a recently published article states that the “ driving force behind many of the mergers and acquisitions completed during the past decade has been the acquirer’s desire to obtain the target’s IP assets. Now, more than ever, the full financial potential of IP is being realized as an additional source of funding to facilitate research and development, acquisitions, and other commercial transactions.” 2 Despite this, a basic business transaction involving intellectual property, a secured loan, has many traps for the imprudent attorney or lender. The American Bar Association Task Force on Security Interests in Intellectual Property concluded that “ [t]he current state of the law governing security interests in intellectual property is unsatisfactory. There is uncertainty as to where and how to file, what constitute notice of a security interest, who has priority, and what properly is cover by a security interest.” 3 Reform of American laws has been long advocated in order to reduce uncertainty, but progress has been slow. As such, this article intends to inform foreign attorneys of the basic problems when securing a loan with intellectual property collateral under United States law.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T14:22:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c323bf836ece4a13a0caf084214d4d8a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1459-9686
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T14:22:54Z
publishDate 2007-01-01
publisher Aalborg University Open Publishing
record_format Article
series Nordic Journal of Commercial Law
spelling doaj.art-c323bf836ece4a13a0caf084214d4d8a2024-04-03T06:11:15ZengAalborg University Open PublishingNordic Journal of Commercial Law1459-96862007-01-012INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY&SECURITY INTERESTS: A US PERSPECTIVESarah TroelsenIt is no secret that intellectual property can be a valuable business asset. As I.B.M.’s CEO, Samuel Palmisano, said, “ [I]ntellectual property is the crucial capital in a global knowledge economy.” 1 Expressing the same sentiment, a recently published article states that the “ driving force behind many of the mergers and acquisitions completed during the past decade has been the acquirer’s desire to obtain the target’s IP assets. Now, more than ever, the full financial potential of IP is being realized as an additional source of funding to facilitate research and development, acquisitions, and other commercial transactions.” 2 Despite this, a basic business transaction involving intellectual property, a secured loan, has many traps for the imprudent attorney or lender. The American Bar Association Task Force on Security Interests in Intellectual Property concluded that “ [t]he current state of the law governing security interests in intellectual property is unsatisfactory. There is uncertainty as to where and how to file, what constitute notice of a security interest, who has priority, and what properly is cover by a security interest.” 3 Reform of American laws has been long advocated in order to reduce uncertainty, but progress has been slow. As such, this article intends to inform foreign attorneys of the basic problems when securing a loan with intellectual property collateral under United States law.https://130.225.53.24/index.php/NJCL/article/view/3030
spellingShingle Sarah Troelsen
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY&SECURITY INTERESTS: A US PERSPECTIVE
Nordic Journal of Commercial Law
title INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY&SECURITY INTERESTS: A US PERSPECTIVE
title_full INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY&SECURITY INTERESTS: A US PERSPECTIVE
title_fullStr INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY&SECURITY INTERESTS: A US PERSPECTIVE
title_full_unstemmed INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY&SECURITY INTERESTS: A US PERSPECTIVE
title_short INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY&SECURITY INTERESTS: A US PERSPECTIVE
title_sort intellectual property security interests a us perspective
url https://130.225.53.24/index.php/NJCL/article/view/3030
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahtroelsen intellectualpropertysecurityinterestsausperspective