Assessing the supply risk of geopolitics on critical minerals for energy storage technology in China

Energy storage technology as a key support technology for China’s new energy development, the demand for critical metal minerals such as lithium, cobalt, and nickel is growing rapidly. However, these minerals have high external dependence and concentrated import sources, increasing the supply risk c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bo Wang, Limao Wang, Shuai Zhong, Ning Xiang, Qiushi Qu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Energy Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenrg.2022.1032000/full
_version_ 1797956062234542080
author Bo Wang
Bo Wang
Limao Wang
Limao Wang
Shuai Zhong
Shuai Zhong
Ning Xiang
Ning Xiang
Qiushi Qu
author_facet Bo Wang
Bo Wang
Limao Wang
Limao Wang
Shuai Zhong
Shuai Zhong
Ning Xiang
Ning Xiang
Qiushi Qu
author_sort Bo Wang
collection DOAJ
description Energy storage technology as a key support technology for China’s new energy development, the demand for critical metal minerals such as lithium, cobalt, and nickel is growing rapidly. However, these minerals have high external dependence and concentrated import sources, increasing the supply risk caused by geopolitics. It is necessary to evaluate the supply risks of critical metal minerals caused by geopolitics to provide a basis for the high-quality development of energy storage technology in China. Based on geopolitical data of eight countries from 2012 to 2020, the evaluation indicators such as geopolitical stability, supply concentration, bilateral institutional relationship, and country risk index were selected to analyze the supply risk of three critical metal minerals, and TOPSIS was applied to construct an evaluation model for the supply risk of critical metal minerals of lithium, cobalt, and nickel in China. The results show that from 2012 to 2017, the security index of cobalt and lithium resources is between .6 and .8, which is in a relatively safe state, while the security index of nickel resources is .2–.4, which is in an unsafe state. From 2017 to 2020, lithium resources remain relatively safe, and the security index of nickel has also risen to between .6 and .7, which is generally in a relatively safe state. However, the security index of cobalt has dropped to .2, which is in an unsafe or extremely unsafe state. Therefore, China needs to pay attention to the safe supply of cobalt resources and formulate relevant strategies to support the large-scale development of energy storage technology.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T23:43:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c32a128c268b4e6ead0e84d02dd91b4e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-598X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T23:43:00Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Energy Research
spelling doaj.art-c32a128c268b4e6ead0e84d02dd91b4e2023-01-11T05:50:30ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Energy Research2296-598X2023-01-011010.3389/fenrg.2022.10320001032000Assessing the supply risk of geopolitics on critical minerals for energy storage technology in ChinaBo Wang0Bo Wang1Limao Wang2Limao Wang3Shuai Zhong4Shuai Zhong5Ning Xiang6Ning Xiang7Qiushi Qu8Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, ChinaCollege of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, ChinaInstitute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, ChinaCollege of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, ChinaInstitute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, ChinaCollege of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, ChinaInstitute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, ChinaCollege of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, ChinaSchool of Economics, Hebei University of Geosciences, Shijiazhuang, ChinaEnergy storage technology as a key support technology for China’s new energy development, the demand for critical metal minerals such as lithium, cobalt, and nickel is growing rapidly. However, these minerals have high external dependence and concentrated import sources, increasing the supply risk caused by geopolitics. It is necessary to evaluate the supply risks of critical metal minerals caused by geopolitics to provide a basis for the high-quality development of energy storage technology in China. Based on geopolitical data of eight countries from 2012 to 2020, the evaluation indicators such as geopolitical stability, supply concentration, bilateral institutional relationship, and country risk index were selected to analyze the supply risk of three critical metal minerals, and TOPSIS was applied to construct an evaluation model for the supply risk of critical metal minerals of lithium, cobalt, and nickel in China. The results show that from 2012 to 2017, the security index of cobalt and lithium resources is between .6 and .8, which is in a relatively safe state, while the security index of nickel resources is .2–.4, which is in an unsafe state. From 2017 to 2020, lithium resources remain relatively safe, and the security index of nickel has also risen to between .6 and .7, which is generally in a relatively safe state. However, the security index of cobalt has dropped to .2, which is in an unsafe or extremely unsafe state. Therefore, China needs to pay attention to the safe supply of cobalt resources and formulate relevant strategies to support the large-scale development of energy storage technology.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenrg.2022.1032000/fullcritical metal mineralsgeopoliticsstorage energy technologyinstitutional distancesupply risk
spellingShingle Bo Wang
Bo Wang
Limao Wang
Limao Wang
Shuai Zhong
Shuai Zhong
Ning Xiang
Ning Xiang
Qiushi Qu
Assessing the supply risk of geopolitics on critical minerals for energy storage technology in China
Frontiers in Energy Research
critical metal minerals
geopolitics
storage energy technology
institutional distance
supply risk
title Assessing the supply risk of geopolitics on critical minerals for energy storage technology in China
title_full Assessing the supply risk of geopolitics on critical minerals for energy storage technology in China
title_fullStr Assessing the supply risk of geopolitics on critical minerals for energy storage technology in China
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the supply risk of geopolitics on critical minerals for energy storage technology in China
title_short Assessing the supply risk of geopolitics on critical minerals for energy storage technology in China
title_sort assessing the supply risk of geopolitics on critical minerals for energy storage technology in china
topic critical metal minerals
geopolitics
storage energy technology
institutional distance
supply risk
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenrg.2022.1032000/full
work_keys_str_mv AT bowang assessingthesupplyriskofgeopoliticsoncriticalmineralsforenergystoragetechnologyinchina
AT bowang assessingthesupplyriskofgeopoliticsoncriticalmineralsforenergystoragetechnologyinchina
AT limaowang assessingthesupplyriskofgeopoliticsoncriticalmineralsforenergystoragetechnologyinchina
AT limaowang assessingthesupplyriskofgeopoliticsoncriticalmineralsforenergystoragetechnologyinchina
AT shuaizhong assessingthesupplyriskofgeopoliticsoncriticalmineralsforenergystoragetechnologyinchina
AT shuaizhong assessingthesupplyriskofgeopoliticsoncriticalmineralsforenergystoragetechnologyinchina
AT ningxiang assessingthesupplyriskofgeopoliticsoncriticalmineralsforenergystoragetechnologyinchina
AT ningxiang assessingthesupplyriskofgeopoliticsoncriticalmineralsforenergystoragetechnologyinchina
AT qiushiqu assessingthesupplyriskofgeopoliticsoncriticalmineralsforenergystoragetechnologyinchina