Comparison of Common Deep Drawing Steel Sheets in terms of Blank Holder Force and Friction Conditions
In this study, it is aimed to make comparison of four different steel sheet materials that are widely used in deep drawing applications by taking blank holder force and friction conditions into account. Comparison is made between a standard steel which is generally used in white goods manufacturing...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Turkish Society of Automotive Engineers
2018-09-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijastech/issue/39477/463629 |
| _version_ | 1797919670623272960 |
|---|---|
| author | M. Emin Erdi̇n Özgür Özdi̇lli̇ |
| author_facet | M. Emin Erdi̇n Özgür Özdi̇lli̇ |
| author_sort | M. Emin Erdi̇n |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In this study, it
is aimed to make comparison of four different steel sheet materials that are
widely used in deep drawing applications by taking blank holder force and
friction conditions into account. Comparison is made between a standard steel
which is generally used in white goods manufacturing (DC01), an ultralow carbon
steel (DC04), a deep drawing steel suitable for cold forming (DD13) and an
extra deep drawing steel resistant to ageing (DD14), which are preferred when
manufacturing a part by deep drawing, if there is not any special material
requirements. The purpose of this study is to make selection between these
mentioned materials easier. Simufact.forming, a plastic deformation analysis
software based on finite element method, and material database of the software
was used in the conducted analyzes. Various blank holder forces were applied
and friction conditions were changed for each material. By investigating
obtained results, it was seen that there is a significant difference between
deep drawing behavior of these materials and DD14 has high deep drawability
even under high blank holder forces with low energy. Moreover, it was observed
that friction conditions have a significant influence on effectiveness of deep
drawing process. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T13:49:15Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c3402df4898d449bbbed9671236aaf62 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2587-0963 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T13:49:15Z |
| publishDate | 2018-09-01 |
| publisher | Turkish Society of Automotive Engineers |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology |
| spelling | doaj.art-c3402df4898d449bbbed9671236aaf622023-02-15T16:10:49ZengTurkish Society of Automotive EngineersInternational Journal of Automotive Science and Technology2587-09632018-09-0123364110.30939/ijastech..46362958Comparison of Common Deep Drawing Steel Sheets in terms of Blank Holder Force and Friction ConditionsM. Emin Erdi̇n0Özgür Özdi̇lli̇1HITIT UNIVERSITYHITIT UNIVERSITYIn this study, it is aimed to make comparison of four different steel sheet materials that are widely used in deep drawing applications by taking blank holder force and friction conditions into account. Comparison is made between a standard steel which is generally used in white goods manufacturing (DC01), an ultralow carbon steel (DC04), a deep drawing steel suitable for cold forming (DD13) and an extra deep drawing steel resistant to ageing (DD14), which are preferred when manufacturing a part by deep drawing, if there is not any special material requirements. The purpose of this study is to make selection between these mentioned materials easier. Simufact.forming, a plastic deformation analysis software based on finite element method, and material database of the software was used in the conducted analyzes. Various blank holder forces were applied and friction conditions were changed for each material. By investigating obtained results, it was seen that there is a significant difference between deep drawing behavior of these materials and DD14 has high deep drawability even under high blank holder forces with low energy. Moreover, it was observed that friction conditions have a significant influence on effectiveness of deep drawing process.https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijastech/issue/39477/463629deep drawingsteel sheetdrawing ratioblank holder forcecoefficient of fric-tionfinite element analysis |
| spellingShingle | M. Emin Erdi̇n Özgür Özdi̇lli̇ Comparison of Common Deep Drawing Steel Sheets in terms of Blank Holder Force and Friction Conditions International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology deep drawing steel sheet drawing ratio blank holder force coefficient of fric-tion finite element analysis |
| title | Comparison of Common Deep Drawing Steel Sheets in terms of Blank Holder Force and Friction Conditions |
| title_full | Comparison of Common Deep Drawing Steel Sheets in terms of Blank Holder Force and Friction Conditions |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of Common Deep Drawing Steel Sheets in terms of Blank Holder Force and Friction Conditions |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Common Deep Drawing Steel Sheets in terms of Blank Holder Force and Friction Conditions |
| title_short | Comparison of Common Deep Drawing Steel Sheets in terms of Blank Holder Force and Friction Conditions |
| title_sort | comparison of common deep drawing steel sheets in terms of blank holder force and friction conditions |
| topic | deep drawing steel sheet drawing ratio blank holder force coefficient of fric-tion finite element analysis |
| url | https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijastech/issue/39477/463629 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT meminerdin comparisonofcommondeepdrawingsteelsheetsintermsofblankholderforceandfrictionconditions AT ozgurozdilli comparisonofcommondeepdrawingsteelsheetsintermsofblankholderforceandfrictionconditions |