Measuring Teachers’ Social-Emotional Competence: Development and Validation of a Situational Judgment Test

Teachers’ social-emotional competence is considered important in order to master the social and emotional challenges inherent in their profession and to build positive teacher-student relationships. In turn, this is key to both teachers’ occupational well-being and positive student development. None...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karen Aldrup, Bastian Carstensen, Michaela M. Köller, Uta Klusmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00892/full
_version_ 1818458512107241472
author Karen Aldrup
Bastian Carstensen
Michaela M. Köller
Uta Klusmann
author_facet Karen Aldrup
Bastian Carstensen
Michaela M. Köller
Uta Klusmann
author_sort Karen Aldrup
collection DOAJ
description Teachers’ social-emotional competence is considered important in order to master the social and emotional challenges inherent in their profession and to build positive teacher-student relationships. In turn, this is key to both teachers’ occupational well-being and positive student development. Nonetheless, an instrument assessing the profession-specific knowledge and skills that teachers need to master the social and emotional demands in the classroom is still lacking. Therefore, we developed the Test of Regulation in and Understanding of Social Situations in Teaching (TRUST), which is a theory-based situational judgment test measuring teachers’ knowledge about strategies for emotion regulation and relationship management in emotionally and socially challenging situations with students. Results from three studies (N = 166 in-service teachers, N = 73 in-service teachers, N = 107 pre-service teachers) showed satisfactory internal consistency for both the emotion regulation and relationship management subtests. Furthermore, confirmatory factor analyses supported the differentiation between the two facets of social-emotional competence. Regarding convergent validity, results from Study 3 revealed a positive association between the profession-specific TRUST and pre-service teachers’ general emotional intelligence. Furthermore, small to moderate correlations with the Big Five personality traits provided evidence for the discriminant validity of TRUST. In Studies 1 and 2, we found evidence for a correlation with external criteria, that is, teachers with higher test scores reported providing more emotional support for students and having better teacher-student relationships. For teachers’ occupational well-being, we found a link with symptoms of depersonalization and job satisfaction, but none for emotional exhaustion. We will discuss the use of TRUST in research, for the evaluation of interventions, in teacher education, and professional development and will illustrate ideas for enhancing the tool.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T22:59:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c3435321b3574efab668d87ff6250bb7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T22:59:38Z
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-c3435321b3574efab668d87ff6250bb72022-12-21T22:44:30ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-05-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.00892519912Measuring Teachers’ Social-Emotional Competence: Development and Validation of a Situational Judgment TestKaren Aldrup0Bastian Carstensen1Michaela M. Köller2Uta Klusmann3Department of Educational Research and Educational Psychology, IPN – Leibniz Insitute for Science and Mathematics Education, Kiel, GermanyDepartment of Educational Research and Educational Psychology, IPN – Leibniz Insitute for Science and Mathematics Education, Kiel, GermanyInstitute for Psychology of Learning and Instruction, Kiel University, Kiel, GermanyDepartment of Educational Research and Educational Psychology, IPN – Leibniz Insitute for Science and Mathematics Education, Kiel, GermanyTeachers’ social-emotional competence is considered important in order to master the social and emotional challenges inherent in their profession and to build positive teacher-student relationships. In turn, this is key to both teachers’ occupational well-being and positive student development. Nonetheless, an instrument assessing the profession-specific knowledge and skills that teachers need to master the social and emotional demands in the classroom is still lacking. Therefore, we developed the Test of Regulation in and Understanding of Social Situations in Teaching (TRUST), which is a theory-based situational judgment test measuring teachers’ knowledge about strategies for emotion regulation and relationship management in emotionally and socially challenging situations with students. Results from three studies (N = 166 in-service teachers, N = 73 in-service teachers, N = 107 pre-service teachers) showed satisfactory internal consistency for both the emotion regulation and relationship management subtests. Furthermore, confirmatory factor analyses supported the differentiation between the two facets of social-emotional competence. Regarding convergent validity, results from Study 3 revealed a positive association between the profession-specific TRUST and pre-service teachers’ general emotional intelligence. Furthermore, small to moderate correlations with the Big Five personality traits provided evidence for the discriminant validity of TRUST. In Studies 1 and 2, we found evidence for a correlation with external criteria, that is, teachers with higher test scores reported providing more emotional support for students and having better teacher-student relationships. For teachers’ occupational well-being, we found a link with symptoms of depersonalization and job satisfaction, but none for emotional exhaustion. We will discuss the use of TRUST in research, for the evaluation of interventions, in teacher education, and professional development and will illustrate ideas for enhancing the tool.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00892/fullsocial-emotional competenceemotion regulationsituational judgment testteacher-student relationshipteacher well-being
spellingShingle Karen Aldrup
Bastian Carstensen
Michaela M. Köller
Uta Klusmann
Measuring Teachers’ Social-Emotional Competence: Development and Validation of a Situational Judgment Test
Frontiers in Psychology
social-emotional competence
emotion regulation
situational judgment test
teacher-student relationship
teacher well-being
title Measuring Teachers’ Social-Emotional Competence: Development and Validation of a Situational Judgment Test
title_full Measuring Teachers’ Social-Emotional Competence: Development and Validation of a Situational Judgment Test
title_fullStr Measuring Teachers’ Social-Emotional Competence: Development and Validation of a Situational Judgment Test
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Teachers’ Social-Emotional Competence: Development and Validation of a Situational Judgment Test
title_short Measuring Teachers’ Social-Emotional Competence: Development and Validation of a Situational Judgment Test
title_sort measuring teachers social emotional competence development and validation of a situational judgment test
topic social-emotional competence
emotion regulation
situational judgment test
teacher-student relationship
teacher well-being
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00892/full
work_keys_str_mv AT karenaldrup measuringteacherssocialemotionalcompetencedevelopmentandvalidationofasituationaljudgmenttest
AT bastiancarstensen measuringteacherssocialemotionalcompetencedevelopmentandvalidationofasituationaljudgmenttest
AT michaelamkoller measuringteacherssocialemotionalcompetencedevelopmentandvalidationofasituationaljudgmenttest
AT utaklusmann measuringteacherssocialemotionalcompetencedevelopmentandvalidationofasituationaljudgmenttest