Third Molar Coronectomy vs Total Removal in Second Molar Periodontal Healing
ABSTRACT: Objectives: The objective of this randomised controlled trial was to compare the periodontal healing at the distal of the adjacent second molar after coronectomy or surgical removal and the surgical morbidities of the 2 techniques. Methods: This is a pilot study of a split-mouth randomise...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2024-04-01
|
Series: | International Dental Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020653923004392 |
_version_ | 1827307944802254848 |
---|---|
author | Si Ling Pang Wai Kan Andy Yeung Kuo Feng Hung Liuling Hui Hui Zhen Jasmine Chung Yiu Yan Leung |
author_facet | Si Ling Pang Wai Kan Andy Yeung Kuo Feng Hung Liuling Hui Hui Zhen Jasmine Chung Yiu Yan Leung |
author_sort | Si Ling Pang |
collection | DOAJ |
description | ABSTRACT: Objectives: The objective of this randomised controlled trial was to compare the periodontal healing at the distal of the adjacent second molar after coronectomy or surgical removal and the surgical morbidities of the 2 techniques. Methods: This is a pilot study of a split-mouth randomised clinical trial comparing the periodontal healing of the adjacent second molar after coronectomy or total removal of lower third molars, which was registered with the University of Hong Kong Clinical Trial Centre as HKUCTR-2948 on 21 February 2020. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were taken preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. Changes in the bone level from the cemento-enamel junction, periodontal probing depth (PPD), and clinical attachment level (CAL) at the distal of the adjacent second molar were compared. Surgical morbidities in terms of pain, infection, neurologic deficit, root exposure, and need for second surgery for removal were assessed. Results: Forty patients (22 male, 18 female) with mean age of 26.7 years were evaluated at 6 months postoperatively. Both coronectomy and total removal groups demonstrated statistically significant reduction in PPD and CAL. There was an alveolar bone gain of 1.28 ± 0.88 mm in the coronectomy group and 1.13 ± 0.73mm in the control group, which was statistically significant (P < .001 for both groups). Conclusions: Early findings show the periodontal healing at the adjacent second molar of coronectomy was as good as that of total removal of lower third molar. There were no differences in terms of surgical morbidities between both groups. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-24T18:48:54Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-c343c259df0c4b60afb4198de3d9555d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0020-6539 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-24T18:48:54Z |
publishDate | 2024-04-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | International Dental Journal |
spelling | doaj.art-c343c259df0c4b60afb4198de3d9555d2024-03-27T04:51:05ZengElsevierInternational Dental Journal0020-65392024-04-01742246252Third Molar Coronectomy vs Total Removal in Second Molar Periodontal HealingSi Ling Pang0Wai Kan Andy Yeung1Kuo Feng Hung2Liuling Hui3Hui Zhen Jasmine Chung4Yiu Yan Leung5Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, ChinaApplied Oral Sciences & Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, ChinaApplied Oral Sciences & Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, ChinaApplied Oral Sciences & Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, ChinaOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, ChinaOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Corresponding author. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, 34 Hospital Road, Hong Kong, China.ABSTRACT: Objectives: The objective of this randomised controlled trial was to compare the periodontal healing at the distal of the adjacent second molar after coronectomy or surgical removal and the surgical morbidities of the 2 techniques. Methods: This is a pilot study of a split-mouth randomised clinical trial comparing the periodontal healing of the adjacent second molar after coronectomy or total removal of lower third molars, which was registered with the University of Hong Kong Clinical Trial Centre as HKUCTR-2948 on 21 February 2020. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were taken preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. Changes in the bone level from the cemento-enamel junction, periodontal probing depth (PPD), and clinical attachment level (CAL) at the distal of the adjacent second molar were compared. Surgical morbidities in terms of pain, infection, neurologic deficit, root exposure, and need for second surgery for removal were assessed. Results: Forty patients (22 male, 18 female) with mean age of 26.7 years were evaluated at 6 months postoperatively. Both coronectomy and total removal groups demonstrated statistically significant reduction in PPD and CAL. There was an alveolar bone gain of 1.28 ± 0.88 mm in the coronectomy group and 1.13 ± 0.73mm in the control group, which was statistically significant (P < .001 for both groups). Conclusions: Early findings show the periodontal healing at the adjacent second molar of coronectomy was as good as that of total removal of lower third molar. There were no differences in terms of surgical morbidities between both groups.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020653923004392Molar, thirdAlveolar bone lossBone regenerationPeriodontal attachment lossRandomised controlled trial |
spellingShingle | Si Ling Pang Wai Kan Andy Yeung Kuo Feng Hung Liuling Hui Hui Zhen Jasmine Chung Yiu Yan Leung Third Molar Coronectomy vs Total Removal in Second Molar Periodontal Healing International Dental Journal Molar, third Alveolar bone loss Bone regeneration Periodontal attachment loss Randomised controlled trial |
title | Third Molar Coronectomy vs Total Removal in Second Molar Periodontal Healing |
title_full | Third Molar Coronectomy vs Total Removal in Second Molar Periodontal Healing |
title_fullStr | Third Molar Coronectomy vs Total Removal in Second Molar Periodontal Healing |
title_full_unstemmed | Third Molar Coronectomy vs Total Removal in Second Molar Periodontal Healing |
title_short | Third Molar Coronectomy vs Total Removal in Second Molar Periodontal Healing |
title_sort | third molar coronectomy vs total removal in second molar periodontal healing |
topic | Molar, third Alveolar bone loss Bone regeneration Periodontal attachment loss Randomised controlled trial |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020653923004392 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silingpang thirdmolarcoronectomyvstotalremovalinsecondmolarperiodontalhealing AT waikanandyyeung thirdmolarcoronectomyvstotalremovalinsecondmolarperiodontalhealing AT kuofenghung thirdmolarcoronectomyvstotalremovalinsecondmolarperiodontalhealing AT liulinghui thirdmolarcoronectomyvstotalremovalinsecondmolarperiodontalhealing AT huizhenjasminechung thirdmolarcoronectomyvstotalremovalinsecondmolarperiodontalhealing AT yiuyanleung thirdmolarcoronectomyvstotalremovalinsecondmolarperiodontalhealing |