Third Molar Coronectomy vs Total Removal in Second Molar Periodontal Healing

ABSTRACT: Objectives: The objective of this randomised controlled trial was to compare the periodontal healing at the distal of the adjacent second molar after coronectomy or surgical removal and the surgical morbidities of the 2 techniques. Methods: This is a pilot study of a split-mouth randomise...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Si Ling Pang, Wai Kan Andy Yeung, Kuo Feng Hung, Liuling Hui, Hui Zhen Jasmine Chung, Yiu Yan Leung
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-04-01
Series:International Dental Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020653923004392
_version_ 1827307944802254848
author Si Ling Pang
Wai Kan Andy Yeung
Kuo Feng Hung
Liuling Hui
Hui Zhen Jasmine Chung
Yiu Yan Leung
author_facet Si Ling Pang
Wai Kan Andy Yeung
Kuo Feng Hung
Liuling Hui
Hui Zhen Jasmine Chung
Yiu Yan Leung
author_sort Si Ling Pang
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT: Objectives: The objective of this randomised controlled trial was to compare the periodontal healing at the distal of the adjacent second molar after coronectomy or surgical removal and the surgical morbidities of the 2 techniques. Methods: This is a pilot study of a split-mouth randomised clinical trial comparing the periodontal healing of the adjacent second molar after coronectomy or total removal of lower third molars, which was registered with the University of Hong Kong Clinical Trial Centre as HKUCTR-2948 on 21 February 2020. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were taken preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. Changes in the bone level from the cemento-enamel junction, periodontal probing depth (PPD), and clinical attachment level (CAL) at the distal of the adjacent second molar were compared. Surgical morbidities in terms of pain, infection, neurologic deficit, root exposure, and need for second surgery for removal were assessed. Results: Forty patients (22 male, 18 female) with mean age of 26.7 years were evaluated at 6 months postoperatively. Both coronectomy and total removal groups demonstrated statistically significant reduction in PPD and CAL. There was an alveolar bone gain of 1.28 ± 0.88 mm in the coronectomy group and 1.13 ± 0.73mm in the control group, which was statistically significant (P < .001 for both groups). Conclusions: Early findings show the periodontal healing at the adjacent second molar of coronectomy was as good as that of total removal of lower third molar. There were no differences in terms of surgical morbidities between both groups.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T18:48:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c343c259df0c4b60afb4198de3d9555d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0020-6539
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T18:48:54Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series International Dental Journal
spelling doaj.art-c343c259df0c4b60afb4198de3d9555d2024-03-27T04:51:05ZengElsevierInternational Dental Journal0020-65392024-04-01742246252Third Molar Coronectomy vs Total Removal in Second Molar Periodontal HealingSi Ling Pang0Wai Kan Andy Yeung1Kuo Feng Hung2Liuling Hui3Hui Zhen Jasmine Chung4Yiu Yan Leung5Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, ChinaApplied Oral Sciences &amp; Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, ChinaApplied Oral Sciences &amp; Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, ChinaApplied Oral Sciences &amp; Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, ChinaOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, ChinaOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Corresponding author. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, 34 Hospital Road, Hong Kong, China.ABSTRACT: Objectives: The objective of this randomised controlled trial was to compare the periodontal healing at the distal of the adjacent second molar after coronectomy or surgical removal and the surgical morbidities of the 2 techniques. Methods: This is a pilot study of a split-mouth randomised clinical trial comparing the periodontal healing of the adjacent second molar after coronectomy or total removal of lower third molars, which was registered with the University of Hong Kong Clinical Trial Centre as HKUCTR-2948 on 21 February 2020. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were taken preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. Changes in the bone level from the cemento-enamel junction, periodontal probing depth (PPD), and clinical attachment level (CAL) at the distal of the adjacent second molar were compared. Surgical morbidities in terms of pain, infection, neurologic deficit, root exposure, and need for second surgery for removal were assessed. Results: Forty patients (22 male, 18 female) with mean age of 26.7 years were evaluated at 6 months postoperatively. Both coronectomy and total removal groups demonstrated statistically significant reduction in PPD and CAL. There was an alveolar bone gain of 1.28 ± 0.88 mm in the coronectomy group and 1.13 ± 0.73mm in the control group, which was statistically significant (P < .001 for both groups). Conclusions: Early findings show the periodontal healing at the adjacent second molar of coronectomy was as good as that of total removal of lower third molar. There were no differences in terms of surgical morbidities between both groups.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020653923004392Molar, thirdAlveolar bone lossBone regenerationPeriodontal attachment lossRandomised controlled trial
spellingShingle Si Ling Pang
Wai Kan Andy Yeung
Kuo Feng Hung
Liuling Hui
Hui Zhen Jasmine Chung
Yiu Yan Leung
Third Molar Coronectomy vs Total Removal in Second Molar Periodontal Healing
International Dental Journal
Molar, third
Alveolar bone loss
Bone regeneration
Periodontal attachment loss
Randomised controlled trial
title Third Molar Coronectomy vs Total Removal in Second Molar Periodontal Healing
title_full Third Molar Coronectomy vs Total Removal in Second Molar Periodontal Healing
title_fullStr Third Molar Coronectomy vs Total Removal in Second Molar Periodontal Healing
title_full_unstemmed Third Molar Coronectomy vs Total Removal in Second Molar Periodontal Healing
title_short Third Molar Coronectomy vs Total Removal in Second Molar Periodontal Healing
title_sort third molar coronectomy vs total removal in second molar periodontal healing
topic Molar, third
Alveolar bone loss
Bone regeneration
Periodontal attachment loss
Randomised controlled trial
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020653923004392
work_keys_str_mv AT silingpang thirdmolarcoronectomyvstotalremovalinsecondmolarperiodontalhealing
AT waikanandyyeung thirdmolarcoronectomyvstotalremovalinsecondmolarperiodontalhealing
AT kuofenghung thirdmolarcoronectomyvstotalremovalinsecondmolarperiodontalhealing
AT liulinghui thirdmolarcoronectomyvstotalremovalinsecondmolarperiodontalhealing
AT huizhenjasminechung thirdmolarcoronectomyvstotalremovalinsecondmolarperiodontalhealing
AT yiuyanleung thirdmolarcoronectomyvstotalremovalinsecondmolarperiodontalhealing