A comparison of forest structural methods of semiarid mangrove species using a field-based approach

The data obtained from field-based forest inventories, mainly basal area and stem density, are relevant for the analysis of aboveground biomass and forest fragmentation. Due to its persistently flooded ground, fieldwork in mangrove forests is time-consuming and complicated. Since mangroves are sens...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Francisco Flores-de-Santiago, Francisco Flores-Verdugo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad Autónoma de Baja California 2024-02-01
Series:Ciencias Marinas
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cienciasmarinas.com.mx/index.php/cmarinas/article/view/3432
_version_ 1797279566946893824
author Francisco Flores-de-Santiago
Francisco Flores-Verdugo
author_facet Francisco Flores-de-Santiago
Francisco Flores-Verdugo
author_sort Francisco Flores-de-Santiago
collection DOAJ
description The data obtained from field-based forest inventories, mainly basal area and stem density, are relevant for the analysis of aboveground biomass and forest fragmentation. Due to its persistently flooded ground, fieldwork in mangrove forests is time-consuming and complicated. Since mangroves are sensitive to the effects of climate change, selecting a reliable field method is of utmost importance. To this end, we analyzed 4 mangrove classes: Rhizophora mangle (RM), Laguncularia racemosa (LR), Avicennia germinans (AG), and AG shrub. We georeferenced and counted all mangrove stems within four 0.04 ha (20 × 20 m square). We analyzed data from 3 circular area plots and the plotless point-centered quarter method (PCQM) based on the original square plots. Depending on the mangrove class, PCQM overestimated basal area by up to 34% and stem density by 21%. The 3 circular plot surveys underestimated basal area from –1% to –29% and stem density from –3 to –25%. Based on the results, we suggest using a circular plot of 0.04 ha (r = 11.28 m) in less dense forests (RM and AG) and a circular plot of 0.015 ha (r = 6.9 m) with forest densities greater than 3,500 stems/ha (LR and AG shrub). The advantages of using the circular plot approach over PCQM are that mangrove inventories can be quantified quickly and do not require a minimum number of sampling points.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T16:27:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c3621e32235c4e8fac72ae88fabcd91b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0185-3880
2395-9053
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T16:27:56Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher Universidad Autónoma de Baja California
record_format Article
series Ciencias Marinas
spelling doaj.art-c3621e32235c4e8fac72ae88fabcd91b2024-03-03T17:25:31ZengUniversidad Autónoma de Baja CaliforniaCiencias Marinas0185-38802395-90532024-02-015010.7773/cm.y2024.3432A comparison of forest structural methods of semiarid mangrove species using a field-based approachFrancisco Flores-de-Santiago0Francisco Flores-Verdugo1Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México The data obtained from field-based forest inventories, mainly basal area and stem density, are relevant for the analysis of aboveground biomass and forest fragmentation. Due to its persistently flooded ground, fieldwork in mangrove forests is time-consuming and complicated. Since mangroves are sensitive to the effects of climate change, selecting a reliable field method is of utmost importance. To this end, we analyzed 4 mangrove classes: Rhizophora mangle (RM), Laguncularia racemosa (LR), Avicennia germinans (AG), and AG shrub. We georeferenced and counted all mangrove stems within four 0.04 ha (20 × 20 m square). We analyzed data from 3 circular area plots and the plotless point-centered quarter method (PCQM) based on the original square plots. Depending on the mangrove class, PCQM overestimated basal area by up to 34% and stem density by 21%. The 3 circular plot surveys underestimated basal area from –1% to –29% and stem density from –3 to –25%. Based on the results, we suggest using a circular plot of 0.04 ha (r = 11.28 m) in less dense forests (RM and AG) and a circular plot of 0.015 ha (r = 6.9 m) with forest densities greater than 3,500 stems/ha (LR and AG shrub). The advantages of using the circular plot approach over PCQM are that mangrove inventories can be quantified quickly and do not require a minimum number of sampling points. https://www.cienciasmarinas.com.mx/index.php/cmarinas/article/view/3432Point-centered quarter methodCircular plotsBasal areaStem density
spellingShingle Francisco Flores-de-Santiago
Francisco Flores-Verdugo
A comparison of forest structural methods of semiarid mangrove species using a field-based approach
Ciencias Marinas
Point-centered quarter method
Circular plots
Basal area
Stem density
title A comparison of forest structural methods of semiarid mangrove species using a field-based approach
title_full A comparison of forest structural methods of semiarid mangrove species using a field-based approach
title_fullStr A comparison of forest structural methods of semiarid mangrove species using a field-based approach
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of forest structural methods of semiarid mangrove species using a field-based approach
title_short A comparison of forest structural methods of semiarid mangrove species using a field-based approach
title_sort comparison of forest structural methods of semiarid mangrove species using a field based approach
topic Point-centered quarter method
Circular plots
Basal area
Stem density
url https://www.cienciasmarinas.com.mx/index.php/cmarinas/article/view/3432
work_keys_str_mv AT franciscofloresdesantiago acomparisonofforeststructuralmethodsofsemiaridmangrovespeciesusingafieldbasedapproach
AT franciscofloresverdugo acomparisonofforeststructuralmethodsofsemiaridmangrovespeciesusingafieldbasedapproach
AT franciscofloresdesantiago comparisonofforeststructuralmethodsofsemiaridmangrovespeciesusingafieldbasedapproach
AT franciscofloresverdugo comparisonofforeststructuralmethodsofsemiaridmangrovespeciesusingafieldbasedapproach