Menguji Ketangguhan Realisme: Kritik terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013 Pasca Pemilu Serentak 2019

This article examines Constitutional Court Decision Number 14/PUU-XI/2013 following the simultaneous elections of 2019. The object is the correctness of the utilisation of realism as a theory of adjudication by the Court in deciding the constitutionality of Law Number 42 of 2008. It can be conclude...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Titon Slamet Kurnia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia 2022-03-01
Series:Jurnal Konstitusi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/1791
_version_ 1797900862776934400
author Titon Slamet Kurnia
author_facet Titon Slamet Kurnia
author_sort Titon Slamet Kurnia
collection DOAJ
description This article examines Constitutional Court Decision Number 14/PUU-XI/2013 following the simultaneous elections of 2019. The object is the correctness of the utilisation of realism as a theory of adjudication by the Court in deciding the constitutionality of Law Number 42 of 2008. It can be concluded that, the Court’s decision is false, i.e. it fails to strengthen presidential in Indonesia, as expected by the Court, according to coattail effect theory. Hence, responding to this failure, this article suggests a caveat that the utilisation of realism should anticipate its fallibility. Therefore, responding to the issue to be more general, this article also suggests a proposal for a constitutional amendment to restructure the judicial review mechanism in accordance with the Canadian model known as, conceptually, judicial review with legislative finality. The recommendation aims to anticipate judicial error in constitutional interpretation as shown by the Constitutional Court Decision Number 14/PUU-XI/2013.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T08:52:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c364203fe74343019792be768663887e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1829-7706
2548-1657
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T08:52:44Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
record_format Article
series Jurnal Konstitusi
spelling doaj.art-c364203fe74343019792be768663887e2023-02-22T04:09:37ZengThe Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of IndonesiaJurnal Konstitusi1829-77062548-16572022-03-0119110.31078/jk1915573Menguji Ketangguhan Realisme: Kritik terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013 Pasca Pemilu Serentak 2019Titon Slamet Kurnia0Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana This article examines Constitutional Court Decision Number 14/PUU-XI/2013 following the simultaneous elections of 2019. The object is the correctness of the utilisation of realism as a theory of adjudication by the Court in deciding the constitutionality of Law Number 42 of 2008. It can be concluded that, the Court’s decision is false, i.e. it fails to strengthen presidential in Indonesia, as expected by the Court, according to coattail effect theory. Hence, responding to this failure, this article suggests a caveat that the utilisation of realism should anticipate its fallibility. Therefore, responding to the issue to be more general, this article also suggests a proposal for a constitutional amendment to restructure the judicial review mechanism in accordance with the Canadian model known as, conceptually, judicial review with legislative finality. The recommendation aims to anticipate judicial error in constitutional interpretation as shown by the Constitutional Court Decision Number 14/PUU-XI/2013. https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/1791Kesalahan YudisialPemilu SerentakRealisme
spellingShingle Titon Slamet Kurnia
Menguji Ketangguhan Realisme: Kritik terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013 Pasca Pemilu Serentak 2019
Jurnal Konstitusi
Kesalahan Yudisial
Pemilu Serentak
Realisme
title Menguji Ketangguhan Realisme: Kritik terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013 Pasca Pemilu Serentak 2019
title_full Menguji Ketangguhan Realisme: Kritik terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013 Pasca Pemilu Serentak 2019
title_fullStr Menguji Ketangguhan Realisme: Kritik terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013 Pasca Pemilu Serentak 2019
title_full_unstemmed Menguji Ketangguhan Realisme: Kritik terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013 Pasca Pemilu Serentak 2019
title_short Menguji Ketangguhan Realisme: Kritik terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013 Pasca Pemilu Serentak 2019
title_sort menguji ketangguhan realisme kritik terhadap putusan mahkamah konstitusi nomor 14 puu xi 2013 pasca pemilu serentak 2019
topic Kesalahan Yudisial
Pemilu Serentak
Realisme
url https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/1791
work_keys_str_mv AT titonslametkurnia mengujiketangguhanrealismekritikterhadapputusanmahkamahkonstitusinomor14puuxi2013pascapemiluserentak2019