Pain Perception and Rate of Canine Retraction Through Self- Ligating Brackets and Conventional Elastomeric Ligation System: A Split Mouth Study

Objective: To evaluate the rate of tooth movement and the pain perception via self-ligating (SL) and conventional elastomeric ligation brackets (CB) system. Material and Methods: This study has been conducted at the Orthodontic Department of Baqai Dental College, Baqai Medical University. The sampl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Irfan Qamruddin, Asma Gul Khan, Fatima Muhmmad Asif, Meanaz Karim, Shifat A. Nowrin, Fazal Shahid, Mohammad Khursheed Alam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association of Support to Oral Health Research (APESB) 2022-03-01
Series:Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/1084
_version_ 1819002710440017920
author Irfan Qamruddin
Asma Gul Khan
Fatima Muhmmad Asif
Meanaz Karim
Shifat A. Nowrin
Fazal Shahid
Mohammad Khursheed Alam
author_facet Irfan Qamruddin
Asma Gul Khan
Fatima Muhmmad Asif
Meanaz Karim
Shifat A. Nowrin
Fazal Shahid
Mohammad Khursheed Alam
author_sort Irfan Qamruddin
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To evaluate the rate of tooth movement and the pain perception via self-ligating (SL) and conventional elastomeric ligation brackets (CB) system. Material and Methods: This study has been conducted at the Orthodontic Department of Baqai Dental College, Baqai Medical University. The sample size of this study comprised 40 patients, falling between the age of 12-30 years without any sex discrimination. Shapiro-Wilk was used to check the distribution of data. Non-parametric Mann Whitney U test was applied to evaluate the pain associated with SL and CB brackets system. To analysis the canine retraction Wilcoxon test was applied for the comparison of CB and SL brackets system. For all statistical analyses, the p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Pain level associated with retraction via CB and SL shows significant differences. However, the rate of canine retraction via CB and SL shows no significant differences at stages T0-T1 and T1-T2. However, stage T2-T3 shows a significant difference. Conclusion: As pain during orthodontic treatment is mostly associated with the level of compression of the periodontal ligament, it may be hypothesized that lower frictional forces generate less compression of the periodontal ligament and blood vessels, and so alter the type of pain experienced.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T23:09:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c37b86a4cfa2494cb0e4c58bace826dd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1519-0501
1983-4632
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T23:09:26Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Association of Support to Oral Health Research (APESB)
record_format Article
series Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada
spelling doaj.art-c37b86a4cfa2494cb0e4c58bace826dd2022-12-21T19:23:47ZengAssociation of Support to Oral Health Research (APESB)Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada1519-05011983-46322022-03-0120Pain Perception and Rate of Canine Retraction Through Self- Ligating Brackets and Conventional Elastomeric Ligation System: A Split Mouth StudyIrfan QamruddinAsma Gul KhanFatima Muhmmad AsifMeanaz KarimShifat A. NowrinFazal ShahidMohammad Khursheed Alam Objective: To evaluate the rate of tooth movement and the pain perception via self-ligating (SL) and conventional elastomeric ligation brackets (CB) system. Material and Methods: This study has been conducted at the Orthodontic Department of Baqai Dental College, Baqai Medical University. The sample size of this study comprised 40 patients, falling between the age of 12-30 years without any sex discrimination. Shapiro-Wilk was used to check the distribution of data. Non-parametric Mann Whitney U test was applied to evaluate the pain associated with SL and CB brackets system. To analysis the canine retraction Wilcoxon test was applied for the comparison of CB and SL brackets system. For all statistical analyses, the p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Pain level associated with retraction via CB and SL shows significant differences. However, the rate of canine retraction via CB and SL shows no significant differences at stages T0-T1 and T1-T2. However, stage T2-T3 shows a significant difference. Conclusion: As pain during orthodontic treatment is mostly associated with the level of compression of the periodontal ligament, it may be hypothesized that lower frictional forces generate less compression of the periodontal ligament and blood vessels, and so alter the type of pain experienced. https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/1084OrthodonticsTooth Movement TechniquesOrthodontic Brackets
spellingShingle Irfan Qamruddin
Asma Gul Khan
Fatima Muhmmad Asif
Meanaz Karim
Shifat A. Nowrin
Fazal Shahid
Mohammad Khursheed Alam
Pain Perception and Rate of Canine Retraction Through Self- Ligating Brackets and Conventional Elastomeric Ligation System: A Split Mouth Study
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada
Orthodontics
Tooth Movement Techniques
Orthodontic Brackets
title Pain Perception and Rate of Canine Retraction Through Self- Ligating Brackets and Conventional Elastomeric Ligation System: A Split Mouth Study
title_full Pain Perception and Rate of Canine Retraction Through Self- Ligating Brackets and Conventional Elastomeric Ligation System: A Split Mouth Study
title_fullStr Pain Perception and Rate of Canine Retraction Through Self- Ligating Brackets and Conventional Elastomeric Ligation System: A Split Mouth Study
title_full_unstemmed Pain Perception and Rate of Canine Retraction Through Self- Ligating Brackets and Conventional Elastomeric Ligation System: A Split Mouth Study
title_short Pain Perception and Rate of Canine Retraction Through Self- Ligating Brackets and Conventional Elastomeric Ligation System: A Split Mouth Study
title_sort pain perception and rate of canine retraction through self ligating brackets and conventional elastomeric ligation system a split mouth study
topic Orthodontics
Tooth Movement Techniques
Orthodontic Brackets
url https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/1084
work_keys_str_mv AT irfanqamruddin painperceptionandrateofcanineretractionthroughselfligatingbracketsandconventionalelastomericligationsystemasplitmouthstudy
AT asmagulkhan painperceptionandrateofcanineretractionthroughselfligatingbracketsandconventionalelastomericligationsystemasplitmouthstudy
AT fatimamuhmmadasif painperceptionandrateofcanineretractionthroughselfligatingbracketsandconventionalelastomericligationsystemasplitmouthstudy
AT meanazkarim painperceptionandrateofcanineretractionthroughselfligatingbracketsandconventionalelastomericligationsystemasplitmouthstudy
AT shifatanowrin painperceptionandrateofcanineretractionthroughselfligatingbracketsandconventionalelastomericligationsystemasplitmouthstudy
AT fazalshahid painperceptionandrateofcanineretractionthroughselfligatingbracketsandconventionalelastomericligationsystemasplitmouthstudy
AT mohammadkhursheedalam painperceptionandrateofcanineretractionthroughselfligatingbracketsandconventionalelastomericligationsystemasplitmouthstudy