Pain Perception and Rate of Canine Retraction Through Self- Ligating Brackets and Conventional Elastomeric Ligation System: A Split Mouth Study
Objective: To evaluate the rate of tooth movement and the pain perception via self-ligating (SL) and conventional elastomeric ligation brackets (CB) system. Material and Methods: This study has been conducted at the Orthodontic Department of Baqai Dental College, Baqai Medical University. The sampl...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Association of Support to Oral Health Research (APESB)
2022-03-01
|
Series: | Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/1084 |
_version_ | 1819002710440017920 |
---|---|
author | Irfan Qamruddin Asma Gul Khan Fatima Muhmmad Asif Meanaz Karim Shifat A. Nowrin Fazal Shahid Mohammad Khursheed Alam |
author_facet | Irfan Qamruddin Asma Gul Khan Fatima Muhmmad Asif Meanaz Karim Shifat A. Nowrin Fazal Shahid Mohammad Khursheed Alam |
author_sort | Irfan Qamruddin |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
Objective: To evaluate the rate of tooth movement and the pain perception via self-ligating (SL) and conventional elastomeric ligation brackets (CB) system. Material and Methods: This study has been conducted at the Orthodontic Department of Baqai Dental College, Baqai Medical University. The sample size of this study comprised 40 patients, falling between the age of 12-30 years without any sex discrimination. Shapiro-Wilk was used to check the distribution of data. Non-parametric Mann Whitney U test was applied to evaluate the pain associated with SL and CB brackets system. To analysis the canine retraction Wilcoxon test was applied for the comparison of CB and SL brackets system. For all statistical analyses, the p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Pain level associated with retraction via CB and SL shows significant differences. However, the rate of canine retraction via CB and SL shows no significant differences at stages T0-T1 and T1-T2. However, stage T2-T3 shows a significant difference. Conclusion: As pain during orthodontic treatment is mostly associated with the level of compression of the periodontal ligament, it may be hypothesized that lower frictional forces generate less compression of the periodontal ligament and blood vessels, and so alter the type of pain experienced.
|
first_indexed | 2024-12-20T23:09:26Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-c37b86a4cfa2494cb0e4c58bace826dd |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1519-0501 1983-4632 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-20T23:09:26Z |
publishDate | 2022-03-01 |
publisher | Association of Support to Oral Health Research (APESB) |
record_format | Article |
series | Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada |
spelling | doaj.art-c37b86a4cfa2494cb0e4c58bace826dd2022-12-21T19:23:47ZengAssociation of Support to Oral Health Research (APESB)Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada1519-05011983-46322022-03-0120Pain Perception and Rate of Canine Retraction Through Self- Ligating Brackets and Conventional Elastomeric Ligation System: A Split Mouth StudyIrfan QamruddinAsma Gul KhanFatima Muhmmad AsifMeanaz KarimShifat A. NowrinFazal ShahidMohammad Khursheed Alam Objective: To evaluate the rate of tooth movement and the pain perception via self-ligating (SL) and conventional elastomeric ligation brackets (CB) system. Material and Methods: This study has been conducted at the Orthodontic Department of Baqai Dental College, Baqai Medical University. The sample size of this study comprised 40 patients, falling between the age of 12-30 years without any sex discrimination. Shapiro-Wilk was used to check the distribution of data. Non-parametric Mann Whitney U test was applied to evaluate the pain associated with SL and CB brackets system. To analysis the canine retraction Wilcoxon test was applied for the comparison of CB and SL brackets system. For all statistical analyses, the p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Pain level associated with retraction via CB and SL shows significant differences. However, the rate of canine retraction via CB and SL shows no significant differences at stages T0-T1 and T1-T2. However, stage T2-T3 shows a significant difference. Conclusion: As pain during orthodontic treatment is mostly associated with the level of compression of the periodontal ligament, it may be hypothesized that lower frictional forces generate less compression of the periodontal ligament and blood vessels, and so alter the type of pain experienced. https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/1084OrthodonticsTooth Movement TechniquesOrthodontic Brackets |
spellingShingle | Irfan Qamruddin Asma Gul Khan Fatima Muhmmad Asif Meanaz Karim Shifat A. Nowrin Fazal Shahid Mohammad Khursheed Alam Pain Perception and Rate of Canine Retraction Through Self- Ligating Brackets and Conventional Elastomeric Ligation System: A Split Mouth Study Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada Orthodontics Tooth Movement Techniques Orthodontic Brackets |
title | Pain Perception and Rate of Canine Retraction Through Self- Ligating Brackets and Conventional Elastomeric Ligation System: A Split Mouth Study |
title_full | Pain Perception and Rate of Canine Retraction Through Self- Ligating Brackets and Conventional Elastomeric Ligation System: A Split Mouth Study |
title_fullStr | Pain Perception and Rate of Canine Retraction Through Self- Ligating Brackets and Conventional Elastomeric Ligation System: A Split Mouth Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Pain Perception and Rate of Canine Retraction Through Self- Ligating Brackets and Conventional Elastomeric Ligation System: A Split Mouth Study |
title_short | Pain Perception and Rate of Canine Retraction Through Self- Ligating Brackets and Conventional Elastomeric Ligation System: A Split Mouth Study |
title_sort | pain perception and rate of canine retraction through self ligating brackets and conventional elastomeric ligation system a split mouth study |
topic | Orthodontics Tooth Movement Techniques Orthodontic Brackets |
url | https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/1084 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT irfanqamruddin painperceptionandrateofcanineretractionthroughselfligatingbracketsandconventionalelastomericligationsystemasplitmouthstudy AT asmagulkhan painperceptionandrateofcanineretractionthroughselfligatingbracketsandconventionalelastomericligationsystemasplitmouthstudy AT fatimamuhmmadasif painperceptionandrateofcanineretractionthroughselfligatingbracketsandconventionalelastomericligationsystemasplitmouthstudy AT meanazkarim painperceptionandrateofcanineretractionthroughselfligatingbracketsandconventionalelastomericligationsystemasplitmouthstudy AT shifatanowrin painperceptionandrateofcanineretractionthroughselfligatingbracketsandconventionalelastomericligationsystemasplitmouthstudy AT fazalshahid painperceptionandrateofcanineretractionthroughselfligatingbracketsandconventionalelastomericligationsystemasplitmouthstudy AT mohammadkhursheedalam painperceptionandrateofcanineretractionthroughselfligatingbracketsandconventionalelastomericligationsystemasplitmouthstudy |