Eligibility for low-dose computerized tomography screening among asbestos-exposed individuals

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to incorporate an estimate of risk for asbestos exposure in the Canadian Cancer Risk Management Lung Cancer (CRMM-LC) microsimulation model. METHODS: In CRMM-LC, a 3-year probability of developing lung cancer can be derived from different risk profiles. An asbestos-expose...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Natalie R Fitzgerald, William M Flanagan, William K Evans, Anthony B Miller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health (NOROSH) 2015-07-01
Series:Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
Subjects:
Online Access: https://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=3496
_version_ 1818833107029065728
author Natalie R Fitzgerald
William M Flanagan
William K Evans
Anthony B Miller
author_facet Natalie R Fitzgerald
William M Flanagan
William K Evans
Anthony B Miller
author_sort Natalie R Fitzgerald
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to incorporate an estimate of risk for asbestos exposure in the Canadian Cancer Risk Management Lung Cancer (CRMM-LC) microsimulation model. METHODS: In CRMM-LC, a 3-year probability of developing lung cancer can be derived from different risk profiles. An asbestos-exposed cohort was simulated and different scenarios of low-dose computerized tomography (LDCT) screening were simulated. RESULTS: As annual LDCT screening among non-asbestos-exposed individuals is less cost-effective than biennial screening, all the scenarios modeled for an asbestos-exposed cohort were biennial. For individuals with a two-fold risk of asbestos-induced lung cancer to be eligible for biennial LDCT screening, a smoking history of ≥15 pack-years would be necessary. For non-smokers with asbestos exposure resulting in a relative risk (RR) for lung cancer, it is not cost-effective to screen those with a RR of 5, but it is cost-effective to screen those with a RR of 10 (the heavily exposed). CONCLUSION: Asbestos-exposed individuals with an estimated two-fold or more risk of lung cancer from asbestos-exposure are eligible for LDCT screening at all ages from 55–74 years if they have a cigarette smoking history of ≥15 pack-years. Asbestos-exposed individuals who are lifelong non-smokers are eligible for LDCT screening at all ages from 55–74 years if they have accumulated a degree of asbestos exposure resulting in an estimated risk of lung cancer of ≥10.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T02:13:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c38aeaa277be4530afdab3303bb80e8c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0355-3140
1795-990X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T02:13:39Z
publishDate 2015-07-01
publisher Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health (NOROSH)
record_format Article
series Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
spelling doaj.art-c38aeaa277be4530afdab3303bb80e8c2022-12-21T20:40:32ZengNordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health (NOROSH)Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health0355-31401795-990X2015-07-0141440741210.5271/sjweh.34963496Eligibility for low-dose computerized tomography screening among asbestos-exposed individualsNatalie R FitzgeraldWilliam M FlanaganWilliam K EvansAnthony B Miller0Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to incorporate an estimate of risk for asbestos exposure in the Canadian Cancer Risk Management Lung Cancer (CRMM-LC) microsimulation model. METHODS: In CRMM-LC, a 3-year probability of developing lung cancer can be derived from different risk profiles. An asbestos-exposed cohort was simulated and different scenarios of low-dose computerized tomography (LDCT) screening were simulated. RESULTS: As annual LDCT screening among non-asbestos-exposed individuals is less cost-effective than biennial screening, all the scenarios modeled for an asbestos-exposed cohort were biennial. For individuals with a two-fold risk of asbestos-induced lung cancer to be eligible for biennial LDCT screening, a smoking history of ≥15 pack-years would be necessary. For non-smokers with asbestos exposure resulting in a relative risk (RR) for lung cancer, it is not cost-effective to screen those with a RR of 5, but it is cost-effective to screen those with a RR of 10 (the heavily exposed). CONCLUSION: Asbestos-exposed individuals with an estimated two-fold or more risk of lung cancer from asbestos-exposure are eligible for LDCT screening at all ages from 55–74 years if they have a cigarette smoking history of ≥15 pack-years. Asbestos-exposed individuals who are lifelong non-smokers are eligible for LDCT screening at all ages from 55–74 years if they have accumulated a degree of asbestos exposure resulting in an estimated risk of lung cancer of ≥10. https://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=3496 risk factorexposureasbestoscancersmokinglung cancerasbestos exposurecost-effectivenessmicrosimulationmathematical modelinglow-dose computerized tomographyct
spellingShingle Natalie R Fitzgerald
William M Flanagan
William K Evans
Anthony B Miller
Eligibility for low-dose computerized tomography screening among asbestos-exposed individuals
Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
risk factor
exposure
asbestos
cancer
smoking
lung cancer
asbestos exposure
cost-effectiveness
microsimulation
mathematical modeling
low-dose computerized tomography
ct
title Eligibility for low-dose computerized tomography screening among asbestos-exposed individuals
title_full Eligibility for low-dose computerized tomography screening among asbestos-exposed individuals
title_fullStr Eligibility for low-dose computerized tomography screening among asbestos-exposed individuals
title_full_unstemmed Eligibility for low-dose computerized tomography screening among asbestos-exposed individuals
title_short Eligibility for low-dose computerized tomography screening among asbestos-exposed individuals
title_sort eligibility for low dose computerized tomography screening among asbestos exposed individuals
topic risk factor
exposure
asbestos
cancer
smoking
lung cancer
asbestos exposure
cost-effectiveness
microsimulation
mathematical modeling
low-dose computerized tomography
ct
url https://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=3496
work_keys_str_mv AT natalierfitzgerald eligibilityforlowdosecomputerizedtomographyscreeningamongasbestosexposedindividuals
AT williammflanagan eligibilityforlowdosecomputerizedtomographyscreeningamongasbestosexposedindividuals
AT williamkevans eligibilityforlowdosecomputerizedtomographyscreeningamongasbestosexposedindividuals
AT anthonybmiller eligibilityforlowdosecomputerizedtomographyscreeningamongasbestosexposedindividuals