Elevating human dimensions of amphibian and reptile conservation, a USA perspective

Abstract Increasing threats to amphibian and reptile species raise the urgency of their conservation. However, relative to other vertebrate groups at risk, amphibians and reptiles have low and more variable social capital; they are not generally high‐priority natural goods and services valued by peo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deanna H. Olson, David S. Pilliod
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-06-01
Series:Conservation Science and Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12685
_version_ 1818470080164397056
author Deanna H. Olson
David S. Pilliod
author_facet Deanna H. Olson
David S. Pilliod
author_sort Deanna H. Olson
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Increasing threats to amphibian and reptile species raise the urgency of their conservation. However, relative to other vertebrate groups at risk, amphibians and reptiles have low and more variable social capital; they are not generally high‐priority natural goods and services valued by people. Consequently, relative to other groups such as birds, mammals, and economically important fish, they garner fewer conservation resources. With increasing risks, their situation degrades. We examine five societal sectors with herpetofaunal conservation interests in the United States (local communities, people in defined geographies and jurisdictions, species and threat specialists and advocates, associated researchers, managers, and policy makers) to understand challenges of low and variable social capital for herpetofauna. With current trends of US public values changing from traditionalist consumerism of wildlife to mutualist coexistence philosophies, a refocus of outreach and inreach efforts could help reframe priorities toward species at greatest risk, rather than broad taxonomic biases. Integrated teams of engaged natural resource managers, researchers, and the interested public can help promote species‐ and issue‐based programs to forestall losses, hence programmatically raising social capital. Heightened recognition of the importance of human relationships and herpetofaunal diversity among researchers, managers, policy makers, educators, artists, authors, citizens, and children could provide inertia to reframe conservation program effectiveness at local‐to‐national scales.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T21:32:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c3920de0419b45b8b1faf7869a0593b9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2578-4854
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T21:32:44Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Conservation Science and Practice
spelling doaj.art-c3920de0419b45b8b1faf7869a0593b92022-12-22T02:29:05ZengWileyConservation Science and Practice2578-48542022-06-0146n/an/a10.1111/csp2.12685Elevating human dimensions of amphibian and reptile conservation, a USA perspectiveDeanna H. Olson0David S. Pilliod1U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station Corvallis Oregon USAU.S. Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center Boise Idaho USAAbstract Increasing threats to amphibian and reptile species raise the urgency of their conservation. However, relative to other vertebrate groups at risk, amphibians and reptiles have low and more variable social capital; they are not generally high‐priority natural goods and services valued by people. Consequently, relative to other groups such as birds, mammals, and economically important fish, they garner fewer conservation resources. With increasing risks, their situation degrades. We examine five societal sectors with herpetofaunal conservation interests in the United States (local communities, people in defined geographies and jurisdictions, species and threat specialists and advocates, associated researchers, managers, and policy makers) to understand challenges of low and variable social capital for herpetofauna. With current trends of US public values changing from traditionalist consumerism of wildlife to mutualist coexistence philosophies, a refocus of outreach and inreach efforts could help reframe priorities toward species at greatest risk, rather than broad taxonomic biases. Integrated teams of engaged natural resource managers, researchers, and the interested public can help promote species‐ and issue‐based programs to forestall losses, hence programmatically raising social capital. Heightened recognition of the importance of human relationships and herpetofaunal diversity among researchers, managers, policy makers, educators, artists, authors, citizens, and children could provide inertia to reframe conservation program effectiveness at local‐to‐national scales.https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12685ecosystem servicesherpetofaunapartnershipssocial capitalsocial networksthreats
spellingShingle Deanna H. Olson
David S. Pilliod
Elevating human dimensions of amphibian and reptile conservation, a USA perspective
Conservation Science and Practice
ecosystem services
herpetofauna
partnerships
social capital
social networks
threats
title Elevating human dimensions of amphibian and reptile conservation, a USA perspective
title_full Elevating human dimensions of amphibian and reptile conservation, a USA perspective
title_fullStr Elevating human dimensions of amphibian and reptile conservation, a USA perspective
title_full_unstemmed Elevating human dimensions of amphibian and reptile conservation, a USA perspective
title_short Elevating human dimensions of amphibian and reptile conservation, a USA perspective
title_sort elevating human dimensions of amphibian and reptile conservation a usa perspective
topic ecosystem services
herpetofauna
partnerships
social capital
social networks
threats
url https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12685
work_keys_str_mv AT deannaholson elevatinghumandimensionsofamphibianandreptileconservationausaperspective
AT davidspilliod elevatinghumandimensionsofamphibianandreptileconservationausaperspective