Das Testimonium Flavianum. Befunde, Diskussionsstand, Perspektiven
Josephus’ passage on Jesus (Ant 18,3,3 § 63–64) is much disputed: authentic, interpolated, or basicly authentic with retouchings by Christian scribes? If, as a growing consensus suggests, the latter is the most plausible position, what would the original text of Josephus had looked like? How should...
Main Author: | Christoph Niemand |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
ArgeAss
2016-09-01
|
Series: | Protokolle zur Bibel |
Online Access: | https://www.protokollezurbibel.at/index.php/pzb/article/view/2330 |
Similar Items
-
Una nota sul testo del Testimonium Flavianum (Antiquitates, XVIII, 63-64) a confronto con le versioni siriaca e araba: resurrezione o visione?
by: Giuseppe Petrantoni
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Zur Funktion der Judasgestalt in den Evangelien. Materialien und Anregungen eines problematischen Befundes
by: Christoph Niemand
Published: (2016-09-01) -
Testimonium De Auditu in The Case Rape of Childrens
by: Citra Dewi Keumala, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
C. M. Bowra on W. S. Barrett: An Unpublished Testimonium
by: William M. Calder III
Published: (2010-11-01) -
Welche Online-Demokratie brauchen wir? Befunde und Perspektiven zum Web 2.0-Einsatz in der Behördenkommunikation
by: Peter Stücheli-Herlach, et al.
Published: (2012-12-01)