Comparison between using inlet circular jet and elliptic jet in combustion chamber by using twin jet flow propane and methanol
Abstract The current work aimed to improve the combustion behavior of a non-premixed twin-jet inlet. The effect of fuel and air inlet shape under different velocities was studied using ANSYS as the process takes place in species transport and finite rate/eddy dissipation, and the flow is considered...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2024-04-01
|
| Series: | Scientific Reports |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58000-2 |
| _version_ | 1797219894400385024 |
|---|---|
| author | Mohamed M. S. Yaseen Ahmed A. Attia M. W. El-Dosouky Maher Gamil Hegazy Ismail M. M. Elsemary |
| author_facet | Mohamed M. S. Yaseen Ahmed A. Attia M. W. El-Dosouky Maher Gamil Hegazy Ismail M. M. Elsemary |
| author_sort | Mohamed M. S. Yaseen |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract The current work aimed to improve the combustion behavior of a non-premixed twin-jet inlet. The effect of fuel and air inlet shape under different velocities was studied using ANSYS as the process takes place in species transport and finite rate/eddy dissipation, and the flow is considered to be turbulent. Two different shapes (circular–circular and circular–elliptic inlet jets) were investigated, and the results show that the behavior and intensity of the fire are affected by variations in the speed and, geometry of the inlet which affects temperature, heat release rate, combustion efficiency, and equivalent ratios. The optimum air/fuel velocities were found to be 2.5/1.5 with circular–circular inlet jets. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T12:40:54Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c3af9020b4b045349025018be7d9b28b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2045-2322 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T12:40:54Z |
| publishDate | 2024-04-01 |
| publisher | Nature Portfolio |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Scientific Reports |
| spelling | doaj.art-c3af9020b4b045349025018be7d9b28b2024-04-07T11:15:01ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222024-04-0114111210.1038/s41598-024-58000-2Comparison between using inlet circular jet and elliptic jet in combustion chamber by using twin jet flow propane and methanolMohamed M. S. Yaseen0Ahmed A. Attia1M. W. El-Dosouky2Maher Gamil Hegazy3Ismail M. M. Elsemary4Mechanical Engineering Department, Higher Technological InstituteCombustion and Energy Technology Lab Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering at Shoubra, Benha UniversityCombustion and Energy Technology Lab Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering at Shoubra, Benha UniversityCombustion and Energy Technology Lab Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering at Shoubra, Benha UniversityCombustion and Energy Technology Lab Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering at Shoubra, Benha UniversityAbstract The current work aimed to improve the combustion behavior of a non-premixed twin-jet inlet. The effect of fuel and air inlet shape under different velocities was studied using ANSYS as the process takes place in species transport and finite rate/eddy dissipation, and the flow is considered to be turbulent. Two different shapes (circular–circular and circular–elliptic inlet jets) were investigated, and the results show that the behavior and intensity of the fire are affected by variations in the speed and, geometry of the inlet which affects temperature, heat release rate, combustion efficiency, and equivalent ratios. The optimum air/fuel velocities were found to be 2.5/1.5 with circular–circular inlet jets.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58000-2CombustionEfficiencyHeat release rateEquivalent ratios |
| spellingShingle | Mohamed M. S. Yaseen Ahmed A. Attia M. W. El-Dosouky Maher Gamil Hegazy Ismail M. M. Elsemary Comparison between using inlet circular jet and elliptic jet in combustion chamber by using twin jet flow propane and methanol Scientific Reports Combustion Efficiency Heat release rate Equivalent ratios |
| title | Comparison between using inlet circular jet and elliptic jet in combustion chamber by using twin jet flow propane and methanol |
| title_full | Comparison between using inlet circular jet and elliptic jet in combustion chamber by using twin jet flow propane and methanol |
| title_fullStr | Comparison between using inlet circular jet and elliptic jet in combustion chamber by using twin jet flow propane and methanol |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between using inlet circular jet and elliptic jet in combustion chamber by using twin jet flow propane and methanol |
| title_short | Comparison between using inlet circular jet and elliptic jet in combustion chamber by using twin jet flow propane and methanol |
| title_sort | comparison between using inlet circular jet and elliptic jet in combustion chamber by using twin jet flow propane and methanol |
| topic | Combustion Efficiency Heat release rate Equivalent ratios |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58000-2 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mohamedmsyaseen comparisonbetweenusinginletcircularjetandellipticjetincombustionchamberbyusingtwinjetflowpropaneandmethanol AT ahmedaattia comparisonbetweenusinginletcircularjetandellipticjetincombustionchamberbyusingtwinjetflowpropaneandmethanol AT mweldosouky comparisonbetweenusinginletcircularjetandellipticjetincombustionchamberbyusingtwinjetflowpropaneandmethanol AT mahergamilhegazy comparisonbetweenusinginletcircularjetandellipticjetincombustionchamberbyusingtwinjetflowpropaneandmethanol AT ismailmmelsemary comparisonbetweenusinginletcircularjetandellipticjetincombustionchamberbyusingtwinjetflowpropaneandmethanol |