Cartiva Protocol

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Previous studies show mixed results for the use of a hydrogel synthetic cartilage implant (SCI) for the treatment of hallux rigidus. Independent retrospective reviews have put results into question with respect to outcomes and reproducibility. The pur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aaron Mates MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2022-11-01
Series:Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00793
_version_ 1811225853057564672
author Aaron Mates MD
author_facet Aaron Mates MD
author_sort Aaron Mates MD
collection DOAJ
description Category: Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Previous studies show mixed results for the use of a hydrogel synthetic cartilage implant (SCI) for the treatment of hallux rigidus. Independent retrospective reviews have put results into question with respect to outcomes and reproducibility. The purpose of this article is to report modification of patient-selection, implantation technique and postoperative protocols. Which may be necessary to improve patient outcomes. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of patients undergoing hydrogel synthetic cartilage implant for the treatment of hallux rigidus from 2017 to 2021. Data collected included patient demographics, radiographic grading/alignment, and outcomes with respect to revision rate and complications. 50 patients, with an average age of (range,) years were analyzed. The average latest follow-up was (range,) months. None were diabetic or smokers. Results: All patients reported improvement upon follow-up, except 2 that reported continued stiffness and occasional pain. No patients required revision or adjuvant procedures to date. There were no infections or related complications. Conclusion: Modification of patient-selection, implantation technique and postoperative protocols should be considered for synthetic cartilage implantation for the treatment of hallux rigidus. In this review improved pain and outcomes at short and long term follow up were demonstrated. There were no reoperations, infections or conversions to fusions. With only two patients experiencing stiffens.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T09:14:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c3b158725b7f400aa914a50f0d557422
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2473-0114
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T09:14:11Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
spelling doaj.art-c3b158725b7f400aa914a50f0d5574222022-12-22T03:38:53ZengSAGE PublishingFoot & Ankle Orthopaedics2473-01142022-11-01710.1177/2473011421S00793Cartiva ProtocolAaron Mates MDCategory: Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Previous studies show mixed results for the use of a hydrogel synthetic cartilage implant (SCI) for the treatment of hallux rigidus. Independent retrospective reviews have put results into question with respect to outcomes and reproducibility. The purpose of this article is to report modification of patient-selection, implantation technique and postoperative protocols. Which may be necessary to improve patient outcomes. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of patients undergoing hydrogel synthetic cartilage implant for the treatment of hallux rigidus from 2017 to 2021. Data collected included patient demographics, radiographic grading/alignment, and outcomes with respect to revision rate and complications. 50 patients, with an average age of (range,) years were analyzed. The average latest follow-up was (range,) months. None were diabetic or smokers. Results: All patients reported improvement upon follow-up, except 2 that reported continued stiffness and occasional pain. No patients required revision or adjuvant procedures to date. There were no infections or related complications. Conclusion: Modification of patient-selection, implantation technique and postoperative protocols should be considered for synthetic cartilage implantation for the treatment of hallux rigidus. In this review improved pain and outcomes at short and long term follow up were demonstrated. There were no reoperations, infections or conversions to fusions. With only two patients experiencing stiffens.https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00793
spellingShingle Aaron Mates MD
Cartiva Protocol
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
title Cartiva Protocol
title_full Cartiva Protocol
title_fullStr Cartiva Protocol
title_full_unstemmed Cartiva Protocol
title_short Cartiva Protocol
title_sort cartiva protocol
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00793
work_keys_str_mv AT aaronmatesmd cartivaprotocol