Genetic differentiation between and within Northern Native American language groups: an argument for the expansion of the Native American CODIS database
The National Research Council recommends that genetic differentiation among subgroups of ethnic samples be lower than 3% of the total genetic differentiation within the ethnic sample to be used for estimating reliable random match probabilities for forensic use. Native American samples in the United...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford University Press
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Forensic Sciences Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2021.1963088 |
_version_ | 1797704951641669632 |
---|---|
author | Jessica A. Weise Jillian Ng Robert F. Oldt Joy Viray Kelly L. McCulloh David Glenn Smith Sreetharan Kanthaswamy |
author_facet | Jessica A. Weise Jillian Ng Robert F. Oldt Joy Viray Kelly L. McCulloh David Glenn Smith Sreetharan Kanthaswamy |
author_sort | Jessica A. Weise |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The National Research Council recommends that genetic differentiation among subgroups of ethnic samples be lower than 3% of the total genetic differentiation within the ethnic sample to be used for estimating reliable random match probabilities for forensic use. Native American samples in the United States’ Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) database represent four language families: Algonquian, Na-Dene, Eskimo-Aleut, and Salishan. However, a minimum of 27 Native American language families exists in the US, not including language isolates. Our goal was to ascertain whether genetic differences are correlated with language groupings and, if so, whether additional language families would provide a more accurate representation of current genetic diversity among tribal populations. The 21 short tandem repeat (STR) loci included in the Globalfiler® PCR Amplification Kit were used to characterize six indigenous language families, including three of the four represented in the CODIS database (i.e. Algonquian, Na-Dene, and Eskimo-Aleut), and two language isolates (Miwok and Seri) using major population genetic diversity metrics such as F statistics and Bayesian clustering analysis of genotype frequencies. Most of the genetic variation (97%) was found to be within language families instead of among them (3%). In contrast, when only the three of the four language families represented in both the CODIS database and the present study were considered, 4% of the genetic variation occurred among the language groups. Bayesian clustering resulted in a maximum posterior probability indicating three genetically distinct groups among the eight language families and isolates: (1) Eskimo, (2) Seri, and (3) all other language groups and isolates, thus confirming genetic subdivision among subgroups of the CODIS Native American database. This genetic structure indicates the need for an increased number of Native American populations based on language affiliation in the CODIS database as well as more robust sample sets for those language families. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2021.1963088 . |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T05:29:00Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-c3b205df8128494aaaf0bdbc333776f5 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2096-1790 2471-1411 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T05:29:00Z |
publishDate | 2021-07-01 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Forensic Sciences Research |
spelling | doaj.art-c3b205df8128494aaaf0bdbc333776f52023-09-03T07:06:46ZengOxford University PressForensic Sciences Research2096-17902471-14112021-07-010011110.1080/20961790.2021.19630881963088Genetic differentiation between and within Northern Native American language groups: an argument for the expansion of the Native American CODIS databaseJessica A. Weise0Jillian Ng1Robert F. Oldt2Joy Viray3Kelly L. McCulloh4David Glenn Smith5Sreetharan Kanthaswamy6Forensic Science Graduate Program, University of CaliforniaMolecular Anthropology Laboratory, Department of Anthropology, University of CaliforniaSchool of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Arizona State UniversitySacramento County District Attorney’s Crime LaboratoryForensic Science Graduate Program, University of CaliforniaMolecular Anthropology Laboratory, Department of Anthropology, University of CaliforniaSchool of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Arizona State UniversityThe National Research Council recommends that genetic differentiation among subgroups of ethnic samples be lower than 3% of the total genetic differentiation within the ethnic sample to be used for estimating reliable random match probabilities for forensic use. Native American samples in the United States’ Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) database represent four language families: Algonquian, Na-Dene, Eskimo-Aleut, and Salishan. However, a minimum of 27 Native American language families exists in the US, not including language isolates. Our goal was to ascertain whether genetic differences are correlated with language groupings and, if so, whether additional language families would provide a more accurate representation of current genetic diversity among tribal populations. The 21 short tandem repeat (STR) loci included in the Globalfiler® PCR Amplification Kit were used to characterize six indigenous language families, including three of the four represented in the CODIS database (i.e. Algonquian, Na-Dene, and Eskimo-Aleut), and two language isolates (Miwok and Seri) using major population genetic diversity metrics such as F statistics and Bayesian clustering analysis of genotype frequencies. Most of the genetic variation (97%) was found to be within language families instead of among them (3%). In contrast, when only the three of the four language families represented in both the CODIS database and the present study were considered, 4% of the genetic variation occurred among the language groups. Bayesian clustering resulted in a maximum posterior probability indicating three genetically distinct groups among the eight language families and isolates: (1) Eskimo, (2) Seri, and (3) all other language groups and isolates, thus confirming genetic subdivision among subgroups of the CODIS Native American database. This genetic structure indicates the need for an increased number of Native American populations based on language affiliation in the CODIS database as well as more robust sample sets for those language families. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2021.1963088 .http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2021.1963088forensic sciencespopulation geneticsnative americansnorth americalanguagesshort tandem repeats (strs or microsatellites) |
spellingShingle | Jessica A. Weise Jillian Ng Robert F. Oldt Joy Viray Kelly L. McCulloh David Glenn Smith Sreetharan Kanthaswamy Genetic differentiation between and within Northern Native American language groups: an argument for the expansion of the Native American CODIS database Forensic Sciences Research forensic sciences population genetics native americans north america languages short tandem repeats (strs or microsatellites) |
title | Genetic differentiation between and within Northern Native American language groups: an argument for the expansion of the Native American CODIS database |
title_full | Genetic differentiation between and within Northern Native American language groups: an argument for the expansion of the Native American CODIS database |
title_fullStr | Genetic differentiation between and within Northern Native American language groups: an argument for the expansion of the Native American CODIS database |
title_full_unstemmed | Genetic differentiation between and within Northern Native American language groups: an argument for the expansion of the Native American CODIS database |
title_short | Genetic differentiation between and within Northern Native American language groups: an argument for the expansion of the Native American CODIS database |
title_sort | genetic differentiation between and within northern native american language groups an argument for the expansion of the native american codis database |
topic | forensic sciences population genetics native americans north america languages short tandem repeats (strs or microsatellites) |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2021.1963088 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jessicaaweise geneticdifferentiationbetweenandwithinnorthernnativeamericanlanguagegroupsanargumentfortheexpansionofthenativeamericancodisdatabase AT jillianng geneticdifferentiationbetweenandwithinnorthernnativeamericanlanguagegroupsanargumentfortheexpansionofthenativeamericancodisdatabase AT robertfoldt geneticdifferentiationbetweenandwithinnorthernnativeamericanlanguagegroupsanargumentfortheexpansionofthenativeamericancodisdatabase AT joyviray geneticdifferentiationbetweenandwithinnorthernnativeamericanlanguagegroupsanargumentfortheexpansionofthenativeamericancodisdatabase AT kellylmcculloh geneticdifferentiationbetweenandwithinnorthernnativeamericanlanguagegroupsanargumentfortheexpansionofthenativeamericancodisdatabase AT davidglennsmith geneticdifferentiationbetweenandwithinnorthernnativeamericanlanguagegroupsanargumentfortheexpansionofthenativeamericancodisdatabase AT sreetharankanthaswamy geneticdifferentiationbetweenandwithinnorthernnativeamericanlanguagegroupsanargumentfortheexpansionofthenativeamericancodisdatabase |