The cost effectiveness of the respiratory virus panel in childhood febrile neutropenia

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study is to analyze the clinical utility and cost of the respiratory virus panel test in the febrile neutropenia (FN) episode in children undergoing chemotherapy. Material and Method: From 2014 to 2018, 180 episodes of FN in 93 children with cancer were retrospect...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hüsamettin Vatansev, Prof. Dr. Uğur Arslan, Melike Emiroğlu, Kübra Ertan, Gülsüm Alkan, Yavuz Köksal, Buket Kara
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Rabia Yılmaz 2023-03-01
Series:Journal of Contemporary Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2867131
_version_ 1797860779179900928
author Hüsamettin Vatansev
Prof. Dr. Uğur Arslan
Melike Emiroğlu
Kübra Ertan
Gülsüm Alkan
Yavuz Köksal
Buket Kara
author_facet Hüsamettin Vatansev
Prof. Dr. Uğur Arslan
Melike Emiroğlu
Kübra Ertan
Gülsüm Alkan
Yavuz Köksal
Buket Kara
author_sort Hüsamettin Vatansev
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study is to analyze the clinical utility and cost of the respiratory virus panel test in the febrile neutropenia (FN) episode in children undergoing chemotherapy. Material and Method: From 2014 to 2018, 180 episodes of FN in 93 children with cancer were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into those with (Group A) and without respiratory virus panel (Group B). The demographic and clinical features and cost analysis of the groups A and B were noted. Results: Of these FN episodes, 46 were in Group A (25.5%) and 134 were in Group B (74.5%). We found positivity in 45 (97.8%) of 46 episodes in Group A. While modification was required in 14 FN episodes (30.4%) in Group A, modification was required in 35 FN episodes (26.1%) in group B. The difference was not statistically significant (p=0.570). In Group A, only 5 (10.8%) were modified according to the respiratory virus panel. The respiratory virus panel prices were $72.43 (interquartile range, $38.8). The ratio of respiratory virus panel cost to the total cost was 9.67% (interquartile range 11.6). The median total cost of group A was $663.18 (interquartile range, 850.1), while that of group B was $596.24 (interquartile range, 723.81). The difference was not statistically significant (p=0.141). Conclusion: The respiratory virus panel may contribute to the preference of antibiotics by giving rapid results in FN attacks. However, no effect on modification rates was observed, and only a small percentage of patients underwent antibiotic modification according to respiratory virus panel.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T21:51:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c3ca14ddf97440ea86b9a2c724a7122c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2667-7180
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T21:51:01Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Rabia Yılmaz
record_format Article
series Journal of Contemporary Medicine
spelling doaj.art-c3ca14ddf97440ea86b9a2c724a7122c2023-03-24T19:43:20ZengRabia YılmazJournal of Contemporary Medicine2667-71802023-03-0113234234610.16899/jcm.12281311809The cost effectiveness of the respiratory virus panel in childhood febrile neutropeniaHüsamettin Vatansev0Prof. Dr. Uğur Arslan1Melike Emiroğlu2Kübra Ertan3Gülsüm Alkan4Yavuz Köksal5Buket Kara6Selcuk University School of Medicine Department of Medical BiochemistrySelcuk University School of Medicine Department of Medical MicrobiologySelcuk University School of Medicine Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious DiseasesSelcuk University School of Medicine Department of PediatricsSelcuk University School of Medicine Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious DiseasesSelcuk University School of Medicine Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology and OncologySelcuk University School of Medicine Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology and OncologyABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study is to analyze the clinical utility and cost of the respiratory virus panel test in the febrile neutropenia (FN) episode in children undergoing chemotherapy. Material and Method: From 2014 to 2018, 180 episodes of FN in 93 children with cancer were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into those with (Group A) and without respiratory virus panel (Group B). The demographic and clinical features and cost analysis of the groups A and B were noted. Results: Of these FN episodes, 46 were in Group A (25.5%) and 134 were in Group B (74.5%). We found positivity in 45 (97.8%) of 46 episodes in Group A. While modification was required in 14 FN episodes (30.4%) in Group A, modification was required in 35 FN episodes (26.1%) in group B. The difference was not statistically significant (p=0.570). In Group A, only 5 (10.8%) were modified according to the respiratory virus panel. The respiratory virus panel prices were $72.43 (interquartile range, $38.8). The ratio of respiratory virus panel cost to the total cost was 9.67% (interquartile range 11.6). The median total cost of group A was $663.18 (interquartile range, 850.1), while that of group B was $596.24 (interquartile range, 723.81). The difference was not statistically significant (p=0.141). Conclusion: The respiratory virus panel may contribute to the preference of antibiotics by giving rapid results in FN attacks. However, no effect on modification rates was observed, and only a small percentage of patients underwent antibiotic modification according to respiratory virus panel.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2867131febrile neutropeniarespiratory virus panelchildrenfebrile neutropeniarespiratory virus panelchildren
spellingShingle Hüsamettin Vatansev
Prof. Dr. Uğur Arslan
Melike Emiroğlu
Kübra Ertan
Gülsüm Alkan
Yavuz Köksal
Buket Kara
The cost effectiveness of the respiratory virus panel in childhood febrile neutropenia
Journal of Contemporary Medicine
febrile neutropenia
respiratory virus panel
children
febrile neutropenia
respiratory virus panel
children
title The cost effectiveness of the respiratory virus panel in childhood febrile neutropenia
title_full The cost effectiveness of the respiratory virus panel in childhood febrile neutropenia
title_fullStr The cost effectiveness of the respiratory virus panel in childhood febrile neutropenia
title_full_unstemmed The cost effectiveness of the respiratory virus panel in childhood febrile neutropenia
title_short The cost effectiveness of the respiratory virus panel in childhood febrile neutropenia
title_sort cost effectiveness of the respiratory virus panel in childhood febrile neutropenia
topic febrile neutropenia
respiratory virus panel
children
febrile neutropenia
respiratory virus panel
children
url https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2867131
work_keys_str_mv AT husamettinvatansev thecosteffectivenessoftherespiratoryviruspanelinchildhoodfebrileneutropenia
AT profdrugurarslan thecosteffectivenessoftherespiratoryviruspanelinchildhoodfebrileneutropenia
AT melikeemiroglu thecosteffectivenessoftherespiratoryviruspanelinchildhoodfebrileneutropenia
AT kubraertan thecosteffectivenessoftherespiratoryviruspanelinchildhoodfebrileneutropenia
AT gulsumalkan thecosteffectivenessoftherespiratoryviruspanelinchildhoodfebrileneutropenia
AT yavuzkoksal thecosteffectivenessoftherespiratoryviruspanelinchildhoodfebrileneutropenia
AT buketkara thecosteffectivenessoftherespiratoryviruspanelinchildhoodfebrileneutropenia
AT husamettinvatansev costeffectivenessoftherespiratoryviruspanelinchildhoodfebrileneutropenia
AT profdrugurarslan costeffectivenessoftherespiratoryviruspanelinchildhoodfebrileneutropenia
AT melikeemiroglu costeffectivenessoftherespiratoryviruspanelinchildhoodfebrileneutropenia
AT kubraertan costeffectivenessoftherespiratoryviruspanelinchildhoodfebrileneutropenia
AT gulsumalkan costeffectivenessoftherespiratoryviruspanelinchildhoodfebrileneutropenia
AT yavuzkoksal costeffectivenessoftherespiratoryviruspanelinchildhoodfebrileneutropenia
AT buketkara costeffectivenessoftherespiratoryviruspanelinchildhoodfebrileneutropenia