Assessing and Governing Ecosystem Services Trade-Offs in Agrarian Landscapes: The Case of Biogas
This paper develops a method to explore how alternative scenarios of the expansion of maize production for biogas generation affect biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES). Our approach consists of four steps: (i) defining scenario targets and implementation of assumptions; (ii) simulating crop dis...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2016-01-01
|
| Series: | Land |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/5/1/1 |
| _version_ | 1828178252588384256 |
|---|---|
| author | Christian Albert Johannes Hermes Felix Neuendorf Christina von Haaren Michael Rode |
| author_facet | Christian Albert Johannes Hermes Felix Neuendorf Christina von Haaren Michael Rode |
| author_sort | Christian Albert |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This paper develops a method to explore how alternative scenarios of the expansion of maize production for biogas generation affect biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES). Our approach consists of four steps: (i) defining scenario targets and implementation of assumptions; (ii) simulating crop distributions across the landscape; (iii) assessing the ES impacts; and (iv) quantifying the impacts for a comparative trade-off analysis. The case study is the region of Hannover, Germany. One scenario assumes an increase of maize production in a little regulated governance system; two others reflect an increase of biogas production with either strict or flexible environmental regulation. We consider biodiversity and three ES: biogas generation, food production and the visual landscape. Our results show that the expansion of maize production results in predominantly negative impacts for other ES. However, positive effects can also be identified, i.e., when the introduction of maize leads to higher local crop diversity and, thus, a more attractive visual landscape. The scenario of little regulation portrays more negative impacts than the other scenarios. Targeted spatial planning, implementation and appropriate governance for steering maize production into less sensitive areas is crucial for minimizing trade-offs and exploiting synergies between bioenergy and other ES. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T05:12:59Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c3d6c80d386d4d738ca54b32dc40ea30 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2073-445X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T05:12:59Z |
| publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Land |
| spelling | doaj.art-c3d6c80d386d4d738ca54b32dc40ea302022-12-22T03:46:43ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2016-01-0151110.3390/land5010001land5010001Assessing and Governing Ecosystem Services Trade-Offs in Agrarian Landscapes: The Case of BiogasChristian Albert0Johannes Hermes1Felix Neuendorf2Christina von Haaren3Michael Rode4Institute of Environmental Planning, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, 30419 Hanover, GermanyInstitute of Environmental Planning, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, 30419 Hanover, GermanyInstitute of Environmental Planning, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, 30419 Hanover, GermanyInstitute of Environmental Planning, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, 30419 Hanover, GermanyInstitute of Environmental Planning, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, 30419 Hanover, GermanyThis paper develops a method to explore how alternative scenarios of the expansion of maize production for biogas generation affect biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES). Our approach consists of four steps: (i) defining scenario targets and implementation of assumptions; (ii) simulating crop distributions across the landscape; (iii) assessing the ES impacts; and (iv) quantifying the impacts for a comparative trade-off analysis. The case study is the region of Hannover, Germany. One scenario assumes an increase of maize production in a little regulated governance system; two others reflect an increase of biogas production with either strict or flexible environmental regulation. We consider biodiversity and three ES: biogas generation, food production and the visual landscape. Our results show that the expansion of maize production results in predominantly negative impacts for other ES. However, positive effects can also be identified, i.e., when the introduction of maize leads to higher local crop diversity and, thus, a more attractive visual landscape. The scenario of little regulation portrays more negative impacts than the other scenarios. Targeted spatial planning, implementation and appropriate governance for steering maize production into less sensitive areas is crucial for minimizing trade-offs and exploiting synergies between bioenergy and other ES.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/5/1/1landscape planningecosystem serviceslandscape serviceslandscape functionstrade-offsbiogas |
| spellingShingle | Christian Albert Johannes Hermes Felix Neuendorf Christina von Haaren Michael Rode Assessing and Governing Ecosystem Services Trade-Offs in Agrarian Landscapes: The Case of Biogas Land landscape planning ecosystem services landscape services landscape functions trade-offs biogas |
| title | Assessing and Governing Ecosystem Services Trade-Offs in Agrarian Landscapes: The Case of Biogas |
| title_full | Assessing and Governing Ecosystem Services Trade-Offs in Agrarian Landscapes: The Case of Biogas |
| title_fullStr | Assessing and Governing Ecosystem Services Trade-Offs in Agrarian Landscapes: The Case of Biogas |
| title_full_unstemmed | Assessing and Governing Ecosystem Services Trade-Offs in Agrarian Landscapes: The Case of Biogas |
| title_short | Assessing and Governing Ecosystem Services Trade-Offs in Agrarian Landscapes: The Case of Biogas |
| title_sort | assessing and governing ecosystem services trade offs in agrarian landscapes the case of biogas |
| topic | landscape planning ecosystem services landscape services landscape functions trade-offs biogas |
| url | http://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/5/1/1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT christianalbert assessingandgoverningecosystemservicestradeoffsinagrarianlandscapesthecaseofbiogas AT johanneshermes assessingandgoverningecosystemservicestradeoffsinagrarianlandscapesthecaseofbiogas AT felixneuendorf assessingandgoverningecosystemservicestradeoffsinagrarianlandscapesthecaseofbiogas AT christinavonhaaren assessingandgoverningecosystemservicestradeoffsinagrarianlandscapesthecaseofbiogas AT michaelrode assessingandgoverningecosystemservicestradeoffsinagrarianlandscapesthecaseofbiogas |